IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI MODEL KIRKPATRICK PADA PERKULIAHAN MASALAH NILAI AWAL DAN SYARAT BATAS

Syamsu Qamar Badu

doi:10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108

IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI MODEL KIRKPATRICK PADA PERKULIAHAN MASALAH NILAI AWAL DAN SYARAT BATAS

Syamsu Qamar Badu, FMIPA Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan gambaran tentang implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick pada Program Pembelajaran Matakuliah Masalah Nilai Awal (MNA) dan Syarat Batas. Dari empat level untuk Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick masing-masing dilakukan penilain dengan alat penilaian yang berbeda. Penilaian kinerja digunakan untuk menilai hasil kerja atau proyek mahasiswa. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Gorontalo berjumlah 58 orang. Data dalam penelitian ini dijaring menggunakan angket dan dilakukan pengujian reliabilitas dengan Crombach’s Alpha. Evaluasi belajar mahasiswa diperoleh dengan menggunakan rubrik penilaian kinerja. Hasil penelitian menggambarkan Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick pada Program Pembelajaran Matakuliah Masalah Nilai Awal (MNA) dan Syarat Batas sangat efektif.

Kata Kunci: Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick, Asesmen Kinerja, Masalah Nilai Awal dan Syarat Batas

______________________________________________________________

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF KIRKPATRICK’S EVALUATION MODEL IN THE LEARNING OF INITIAL VALUE AND BONDARY CONDITION PROBLEMS

Abstract This research is aimed at describing the implementation of the implementation of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model in the learning of Initial Value and Bondary Condition Problems. Four each of the four different levels in the model, an evaluation was conducted using different instruments. A performance evaluation was to assess the students’ product or project. This was a qualitative descriptive study involving 58 students of Mathematics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, State University of Gorontalo as the sample. The data were collected by questionnaire; the reliability was tested through Cronbrach’s alpha. Students’ learning achievement was scored using a performance rubric. The study shows that Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model for the learning program for Initial Values and Boundary Condition Problems is very effective.

Keywords: Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model, Performance Assessment, Initial Value and Boundary Condition Problems

Keywords

Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick; Asesmen Kinerja; Masalah Nilai Awal dan Syarat Batas

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References

Eko Putro Widoyoko. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Garfield, J. B. (1994). Beyond Testing and Grading: Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning.

Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1991). Educational Assessment and Reporting. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publisher.

Jin Yang & Raul Valdes Cotera. (2000). Conceptual Evaluation and Policy Developments in Lifelong Learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning, Germany.

Johnson, R. L. (2009). Assessing Performance: Designing, Scoring, and Validating Performance Tasks. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1993). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Mardapi, D. (1999). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi. Makalah disajikan dalam Penataran Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika SLTP untuk Guru Inti Matematika di MGMP SLTP, PPPG Matematika Yogyakarta.

Mardapi, D. (2000). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Makalah disajikan dalam Konvensi Pendidikan Nasional, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Mardapi, D. (2003). Kurikulum 2004 dan Optimalisasi Sistem Evaluasi Pendidikan di Sekolah. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Kurikulum 2004 Berbasis Kompetensi, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta.

Mokhtari, K., Yellin, D., Bull, K., & Montgomery, D. (1996). Portfolio Assessment in Teacher Education: Impact on Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitudes. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4).

Oliva, P. F. (1992). Developing the Curriculum. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Oriondo, L. L., & Antonio, E. M. D. (1998). Evaluating Educational Outcomes: Test, Measurement, and Evaluation. Florentino St: Rex Printing Company.

Peterman, F. P. (2005). Designing Performance Assessment Systems for Urban Teacher Preparation. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom Assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2010). Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers. Heidelberg: Springer.

Stark, J. S., & Thomas, A. (1994). Assessment and Program Evaluation. Needham Heights: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing.

Teodoro, V. D. (2011). Mathematical Modelling in Science and Mathematics Education. Computer Physics Communications, 182, 8–10.

Tut, M. A. (2010). An Alternative Approach to Improve Mathematics Performance of Fourth Graders: GA’s in Mathematics Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2046–2050.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108