PENGEMBANGAN BUKU PEDOMAN GURU PADA PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA SMA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PROBLEM SOLVING LEVEL INKUIRI

Susi Fatikhah Setiyawati; Heru Kuswanto

doi:10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7509

PENGEMBANGAN BUKU PEDOMAN GURU PADA PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA SMA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PROBLEM SOLVING LEVEL INKUIRI

Susi Fatikhah Setiyawati, , Indonesia
Heru Kuswanto, Pendidikan Fisika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7509

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) menghasilkan buku pedoman guru untuk pembelajaran fisika SMA menggunakan model problem solving sesuai level inkuiri yang layak digunakan; (2) mendeskripsikan keberhasilan pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model problem solving (MPS) sesuai dengan level inkuiri sesuai dengan buku pedoman terhadap peningkatan aktivitas peserta didik dan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan, sesuai langkah yang dikembangkan oleh Borg & Gall. Subjek coba menggunakan delapan kelas. Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket respon peserta didik, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan proses pembelajaran, lembar observasi aktivitas belajar dan tes kemampuan berfikir kritis peserta didik. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji multivariat (Manova). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produk yang dikembangkan ditinjau dari aspek materi, petunjuk umum buku, RPP & LKPD, dan perangkat penilaiam pembelajaran menurut ahli materi dan ahli media berkategori baik dan terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan berfikir kritis dan aktivitas belajar peserta didik yang signifikan antara keenam level inkuiri yang diujicobakan.

Kata Kunci: model problem solving, level inkuiri, kemampuan berfikir kritis, aktivitas belajar

DEVELOPING A HANDBOOK FOR TEACHER IN TEACHERS HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL PHYSICS USE THE MODEL OF PROBLEM SOLVING LEVEL OF INQUIRY

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) to produce a handbook for teachers high school level physics use a model of problem solving with level of inquiry fit for use; (2) to determine the successful learning of physics using a model of problem solving in accordance with the level of inquiry to increase learning activities of learners and critical thinking abilities of learners. This research is the development, which refers to measures developed by Borg & Gall. The subject try consists of eight classes. Data collection using the questionnaire responses of learners, observation sheets learning process, observation sheet activities and critical thinking ability test learners. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis (Manova). The results showed that the product is developed in terms of material aspects, the general guide book, subject specific paedagogy, students worksheet and the evaluation of learning by material experts and media experts categorized good and differences in the increase in critical thinking skills and learning activities of learners between the significant and simultaneous kenam inquiry levels tested.

Keywords: model of problem solving, level of inquiry, activity of learners, critical thinking abilities

Keywords

model problem solving; level inkuiri; kemampuan berfikir kritis; aktivitas belajar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Borg, W. R, & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: an introduction, ( ). Longman: New York & London.

Carl, J. W. (2012). Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning sequences to teach science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 9-15. Diambil pada tanggal 6 Mei 2015, dari http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/

Douglas, L. (2011). Differentiated Science Inquiry. Thousand Oaks. Corwin

Eko, P. W. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Ennis, R. H. (2002). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum and its assessment. In Arthur L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Pp. 44-46. Diambil pada tanggal 22 Mei 2015, dari http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/

Frank, S. X., Joseph S. S., & Joyce D. W. (2008). The science quest: using inquiry/discovery to enhcnace student learning, grades 7–12.United States of America; PB Printing.

Jinfa, C. & Frank, L. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to students learning. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Diambil pada tanggal 13 November 2014 dari www.nctm.org

Johnson, R.A., & Wichern, D.W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical Analysis ( ed). Upper Saddler River. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problem; a handbook for designing problem solving learning environments. New York. Taylor & Francis.

Kenneth, H., & Patricia, H. (2010). Cooperative problem solving in physics. University of Minnesota. National Science Foundation

Lee, H. H., & Jean, D. H. (2012). Incorporating active learning and student inquiry into an introductory merchandising class. Canadian Center of Science and Education 55. Higher Education Studies 2, No. 1. Diambil pada tanggal 22 Desember 2014, dari www.ccsenet.org/hes

Liliana, C. & Haiduc, L. (2009). Is Romanian science school curricula open toward the development of school students’ critical thinking. Acta Didactica Napocensia. 2, (3). Diambil pada tanggal 21 November 2014, dari http://www.researchgate.net/publication/26851425

Lisa, G. S., & Mark I. S. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. L, (2), Spring/Summer. Diambil pada tanggal 1 November 2014, dari https://my.parker.edu/ICS/icsfs/

Lloyd, M.,. M., William, W. C., Megan, L. G., Jacita, M., & George, A. (2014). The effect of using an explicit general problem solving teaching approach on elementary pre-service teachers’ ability to solve heat transfer problems. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 164. 2147-611X. Diambil pada tanggal 2 April 2015, dari http://ijemst.com/

Maisaroh & Roestriningsih. (2010). Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa dengan menggunakan metode pembelajaran active learning tipe quiz team pada mata pelajaran keterampilan dasar komunikasi di SMK Negeri 1 Bogor. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 8, (2). Diambil pada tanggal 22 Mei 2015, dari http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/

Mundilarto. (2010). Penilaian hasil belajar fisika. FMIPA. UNY. P2IS.

Newman, J. (2008). Physics of the life of Science. New York. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Putu, I. G. S., (2005). Pengembangan kompetensi divergen dan kritis melalui pemecahan masalah matematika open-ended. Pada Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. IKIP Negeri Singaraja, No. 3 th XXXVIII Juli 2005. FMIPA: IKIP Negeri Singaraja

Ristiasari, T., Bambang, P., & Sri, S. (2012). Model pembelajaran problem solving dengan mind map terhadap kemampuan berfikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Unnes 1, 3 (2012). Diambil pada tanggal 22 April 2015, dari http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/

Coe, R. (2002). What effect size is and why it is Iportant. Makalah disajikan dalam seiminar di British Educational Research Association annual conference. Durham: University of Durham.

Robert, D., Barbara, L., & Wendy, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 17, (2), 160-166 Diambil pada tanggal 20 Mei 2015, dari http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE55.pdf

Santyasa, I. W. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif. Makalah disajikan dalam pelatihan tentang Penenlitian Tindakan Kelas bagi Guru-guru SMP dan SMA di Nusa Penida.Pada tanggal 29 Juni s.d 1 Juli 2007 di Nusa Penida.

Sardiman, A.M. (2011). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta. Rajawali Press.

Shakirova, D. M. (2007). Technology for the shaping of college students' and upper-grade students' critical thinking. Russian Education & Society, 49(9), 42-52. Diambil pada tanggal 22 April 2015, dari https://bblearn.nau.edu/

Suparwoto. (2011). Simetri dalam fisika dan implementasinya dalam pendidikan karakter. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA.

Suter, W. N. (2012). Introduction to educational research a critical thinking approach ( ed.). Thousand Oaks. Corwin

Yin, K. Y., Abdullah, A. G. K, & Alazidiyeen, N. J. (2011). Collaborative problem solving methods towards critical thinking. International Education Studies, 4(2), 58-62. Diambil pada tanggal 22 Mei 2014, dari https://www.zotero.org/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7509