PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN InSTAD TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS DAN HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF FISIKA DI SMA

Richie Erina; Heru Kuswanto

doi:10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7507

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN InSTAD TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS DAN HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF FISIKA DI SMA

Richie Erina, , Indonesia
Heru Kuswanto, Pendidikan Fisika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7507

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran InSTAD terhadap: (1) keterampilan proses sains peserta didik, (2) hasil belajar kognif peserta didik, dan (3) proses sains dan hasil belajar kognitif peserta didik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan mengguna-kan desain kuasi eksperimen. Analisis data menggunakan Independent t-test dan MANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) penerapan model pembelajaran InSTAD secara signifikan lebih berpengaruh positif terhadap keterampilan proses sains dibandingkan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing, dan hal ini ditunjukkan dengan output (t= 7.47 dan 7.53) dengan signifikansi sebesar 0.00 (sigifikansi < 0.05); (2) penerapan model pembelajaran InSTAD secara signifikan lebih berpengaruh positif terhadap hasil belajar kognitif dibandingkan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing, dan hal ini ditunjukkan dengan output (t= 4.41dan 5.00) dengan signifikansi sebesar 0.00 (sigifikansi < 0.05); (3) penerapan model pembelajaran InSTAD secara signifikan lebih berpengaruh positif terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar kognitif dibandingkan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing, dan hal ini ditunjukkan dengan output (F= 26.36) dan signifikansi sebesar 0.00 (sigifikansi < 0.05).

Kata Kunci: InSTAD, keterampilan proses sains, hasil belajar kognitif

THE EFFECT OF InSTAD LEARNING MODEL ON THE SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS AND COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Abstract

This study aims to find out the effect of InSTAD learning model on: (1) the science process skills of the students, (2) the cognitive learning outcomes of the students, (3) the science process skills and cognitive learning outcomes of the students. This study is a quantitative research using a quasi-experimental design. The data analysis used the Independent t-test and MANOVA. The results show that: (1) the implementation of InSTAD learning model gives a significantly more positive effect to the science process skills of the students than guided inquiry learning does, and it is shown by the output value of the t-test (7.47 and 7.53) at the significance level of 0.00. (significance < 0.05); (2) the implementation of InSTAD learning model gives a significantly more positive effect to the cognitive learning outcomes of students than guided inquiry learning does, and it is shown by the output value of the t-test (4.41and 5.00) at the significance level of 0.00 (significance < 0.05); (3) the implementation of InSTAD learning model gives a significantly more positive effect to the science process skills and learning outcomes of students than guided inquiry learning does, and it is shown by the output value of the F-test (26.36) at the significance level of 0.00 (significance < 0.05).

Keywords: InSTAD, science process skills, cognitive learning outcomes

Keywords

InSTAD; keterampilan proses sains; hasil belajar kognitif

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aktamis, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills education on student;s scienctific creavity, science attitudes and academic achievement. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 9, issue 1. https://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/v9_issue1_files/aktamis.pdf.

Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Internet resource. educational innovations. http://www.miseagrant.umich.edu/lessons/files/2013/05/The-Many-Levels-ofInquiry-NSTA-article.pdf

Chemnews. (2011). Guided inquiry transforms laboratorie. https://www.chem.umn.edu/news/newsletter/2011-december.pdf.

Feyzioğlua, B., akyildiz, M., Demirdağ, B., & altun, E. (2012). Developing a science process skills test for secondary students: validity and reliability study. Educational sciences: theory & practice-12(3). http://www.academia.edu/2328992/Developing_a_Science_Process_Skills_Test_for_Secondary_Students_Validity_and_Reliability_Study

Gencosman, T., & Doğru, M. (2012). Effect of student teams-achienement division technique used in science and technology education on self-efficacy, test anxiety and academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 11, No. 1. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/9871419166833.pdf

Hake, R.R. (1997). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66 (1).

Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011). Improving the science process skills ability of science student teaches using I diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education. 3(1):26-38.

Keil, C., Haney, J., & Zofel, J. (2009). Improvements in student achievement and science process skills. using environmental health science problem-based learning curricula. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Volume 13, No. 1.

Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2012). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. http://www.tcd.ie/teachinglearning/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Kennedy_Writing_and_Using_Learning_Outcomes.pdf

Khan, G.N., & Inamullah, H.M. (2011). Effect of student’s team achievement division (stad) on academic achievement of students. Asian Social Science Vol. 7, No. 12. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/13435

Kordaki, M., Dradoumis, T., & Fragidakis, D. (2012). Intelligent adaptation & personalization techniques. sci 408, outcomes: a practical guide. using learning. http://www.ct.aegean.gr/people/kordaki/books/B12.pdf

Lei Bao (2006). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. Am. J. Phys. 74 10. http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~lbao/Papers/AJP_2006-10-917-g-factor1.pdf

Linney (2008). Physics, astronomy and astrophysics. Quality assurance agency for higher education. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Physics-astronomy-and-astrophysics.pdf

Munzenmaier, C. & Rubin, N. (2013). Perspectives Bloom’s taxonomy: Whats’s old is new again. Santa Rosa: The eLearning guild. http://educationalelearningresources.yolasite.com/resources/guildresearch_blooms2013%20(1).pdf

O’Brien, J. (2007). Writing learning outcomes a guide for academics. University of Limerick. http://www3.ul.ie/ctl/sites/default/files/Learning%20outcomes%202008.pdf

Olufunminiyi, A., & Afolabi. F. (2010). Analysis of science process skills in west african senior secondary school certificate physics practical examinations in nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 5 (4): ISSN 1818-6785. http://www.idosi.org/aejsr/5(4)10/3.pdf

Özdilek, Z., & Bulunuz, N. (2009). The Effect of A Guided Inquiry Method on Pre-Service Teachers’ Science Teaching Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Turkish Science Education. Volume 6, Issue 2. http://www.tused.org/internet/tused/archive/v6/i2/text/tusedv6i2s3.pdf

Potter, K.M., & Kustra, E. (2012). A primer on learning outcomes and the solo taxonomy. Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Windsor. www1.uwindsor.ca/ctl/system/files/PRIMER-on-Learning Outcomes.pdf.

Rabaani, A.A. (2014). The acquisition of science process skills by omani’s pre-service social studies’ teachers. European Journal of Educational Studies 6(1). http://ozelacademy.com/ejes.v6.i1-2.pdf

Tiangtong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (stad) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. International Education Studies; Vol. 6, No. 4. file:///C:/Users/WIN8/Downloads/25635-85774-2-PB%20(2).pdf

Vlassi, M., & Karaliota, A. (2012). The comparison between guided inquiry and traditional teaching methode. a case study for the teaching of the structure of matter to 8th grade greek studets. Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 (2013). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813033296

Warawudhi, R. (2012). English reading achievement: student teams-achievement division (stad) vs lecture method for efl learners. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia.Volume 10 Number 1. http://www.seaairweb.info.

Zeidan, H.A., & Jayosi, R.M. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among palestinian secondary school students. World Journal of Education Vol. 5, No. 1. http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wje/article/view/5890

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7507