EVALUASI KESESUAIAN PERKULIAHAN MICROTEACHING PENDIDIKAN FISIKA TERHADAP KKNI DI UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i1.4530Keywords:
evaluation, microteaching class, KKNIAbstract
Evaluation of suitability evaluation of physics education microteachig class to KKNI in Sunan Kalijaga Islamic University was done by stake model with quantitave descriptive analysis. Based on data analysis indicate that (1) the suitability of planning class to the achievement of KKNI Level 6 phisics education at 45.45% ( enough categorized); (2) the suitability of the implementation of class held on the achievement KKNI Level 6 physics education viewed through the achievement of the student's ability to KKNI Level 6 at 75.34% (very well categorized) and the role of the lecturer to the achievement of the students ability to KKNI Level 6 amounting to 55.01% (enough categorized); and (3) the conformity assessment of the achievement of the lecturers do KKNI Level 6 physical education by 72.73% (well categorized).References
Earl, K.& Giles, D.(2011). Another look at assessment: Assessment in learning. New Zealand Journal of Teachers' Work, 6 (1), pp.11-20.
Erlina. (2012). Portofolio sebagai teknik alter-natif penilaian dalam pembelajaran qiraah. Jurnal Al-Bayan, 4 (2), pp.1-10.
Ismail, S.A.A. (2011). Student teachers' microteaching experiences in a preservice english teacher education program. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2 (5), pp.1043-1051.
Mundilarto. (2010). Penilaian hasil belajar fisika. Yogyakarta: P2 IS FMIPA UNY.
Saban, A. & Coklar, A. N. (2013). Pre-service teachers' opinions about the micro-teaching method in teaching practice classes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12 (2), pp.234-240.
La Sulo,S.L.;Paranto, S.; Soedirdjo. (1983). Pengajaran mikro. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Sudiyatno & Nuryanto, A. (2009). Model pembelajaran microteachng untuk calon guru smk rsbi. Diakses pad tanggal 21 Maret 2015, jam 20.20 WIB dari http://staff.uny.ac.id/system/files/penelitian/Apri%20Nuryanto,S.Pd.ST.,M.T./MODEL%20PEMBELAJARAN%20MICROTEACHING.pdf.
Sukaswanto. (2013). Mengaktifkan peran maha-siswa peserta pengajaran mikro dalam mensupervisi pelaksanaan pengajaran mikro. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 21 (3), pp.238-245.
Suwarna;Slamet,M.; Raharja,S. (2005). Peng-ajaran mikro. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Tim UIN. (2011). Buku panduan praktik pem-belajaran mikro. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.Tim UNY. (2012). Buku panduan micro-teaching. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Juliantine, T. (2012). Penilaian dalam pendidik-an jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga. 1 (8), pp.1-12.
Wati, U.A. (2014). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran yang kondusif dan efektif. Diakses pada tanggal 10 Maret 2015, jam 21.00 WIB darihttp://www.scribd.com/doc/197888403/ PELAKSANAAN-PEMBELAJARAN# scribd
Asril, Z. (2010). Microteaching. Jakarta: Raja-wali Pers
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA (JIPI). However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
