Model forensik literasi dalam pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi: Efektivitas pembelajaran dan responnya

Abdul Rasid Saraha; Sudir Umar; Nurfatimah Sugrah

doi:10.21831/jipi.v7i1.34149

Model forensik literasi dalam pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi: Efektivitas pembelajaran dan responnya

Abdul Rasid Saraha, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
Sudir Umar, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
Nurfatimah Sugrah, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia

10.21831/jipi.v7i1.34149

Abstract

Abstrak: elah dilakukan penelitian penerapan pembelajaran daring (dalam jaringan) menggunakan model forensik literasi (FL), pada materi kinetika reaksi mata kuliah kimia dasar. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas dan respon mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran ini. Desain dalam penelitian ini adalah pretest dan postest one group design, dengan sampel berjumlah 31 mahasiswa dari program studi pendidikan kimia, FKIP, Universitas Khairun, Ternate. Metode untuk mengetahui efektivitas pembelajaran daring dengan FL menggunakan teknik analisis data paired sample t-test. Keaktifan mahasiswa, ketelusuran literatur dan relevansi argumentasi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran ini dianalisis dengan metode observasi. Sedangkan respon mahasiswa terkait ketersediaan sumber daya, proses pembelajaran, motivasi belajar, aktivitas literasi, dan pendapat mahasiswa dianalisis dengan menggunakan angket. Berdasarkan analisis data hasil belajar manunjukkan adanya pengaruh antara pembelajaran daring menggunakan model FL dengan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Tanggapan mahasiswa terkait proses pembelajaran juga menunjukkan respon positif, serta mampu meningkatkan motivasi belajar mahasiswa khususnya dalam melakukan aktifitas literasi. Aktivitas literasi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran ini juga menunjukkan tren positif dengan indikasi tingginya persentase keaktifan mahasiswa dalam mengemukakan argumentasi.

Forensic literacy models in online learning in a pandemic period: Learning effectiveness and its response

Abstract: Research on the Implementation of online learning using the forensic literacy (FL) model has been carried out on the reaction kinetics material of basic chemistry courses. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and response of students. This study was designed in a one-group pretest and posttest, with a sample of 31 students from the chemistry education study program, FKIP, Khairun University, Ternate. The method to determine the effectiveness of online learning with FL used the data analysis technique paired sample t-test. Student activity, literature traceability, and the student of the relevance of argumentation in this study were analyzed using the observation method. Meanwhile, student responses related to resource availability, learning process, learning motivation, literacy activities, and student opinions were analyzed using a questionnaire. Based on the analysis of learning outcomes data, it shows that there was an influence between online learning using the FL model and student learning outcomes. Student responses related to the learning process also showed a positive response and were able to increase student motivation, especially in literacy activities. Student literacy activities in this study also showed a positive trend with an indication of the high percentage of student activity in arguing.

Keywords

Pembelajaran daring; Pembelajaran di masa pandemi; Model pembelajaran daring; Online learning; Learning in the pandemic; Online learning models

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Abidin, Z., & Jupri, A. (2017). The use of multiliteration model to improve mathematical connection ability of primary school on geometry. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 603–610.

Aliyu, F., & Talib, C. A. (2019). Virtual chemistry laboratory: A panacea to problems of conducting chemistry practical at science secondary schools in Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 544–549. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1079.0585C19

Badriyah, N. L., Anekawati, A., & Azizah, L. F. (2020). Application of PjBL with brain-based STEAM approach to improve learning achievement of students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.29884

Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006

Chanprasitchai, O. A., & Khlaisang, J. (2016). Inquiry-based learing for a virtual learning community to enhance problem-solving ability of applied thai traditional medicine students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 77–87.

Cheung, C., & Cable, J. (2017). Eight principles of effective online teaching: A decade-long lessons learned in project management education. PM World Journal Eight Principles of Effective Online Teaching, VI(7), 1–16. http://pmworldjournal.net/article/eight-principles-effective-online-teaching/

Dantas, L. A., & Cunha, A. (2020). An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning process. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100017

Gorbunovs, A., Kapenieks, A., & Cakula, S. (2016). Self-discipline as a Key Indicator to Improve Learning Outcomes in e-learning Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 231(May), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.100

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449

Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Productive use of learning resources in an online problem-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.001

Kintu, M. J., & Zhu, C. (2016). Student characteristics and learning outcomes in a blended learning environment intervention in a Ugandan university. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(3), 181–195.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001

Meiyanti, R., & Ismaniah, I. (2015). Perkembangan digital forensik saat ini dan mendatang. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah, 15(2).

Mirazita, Y., & Rohmiyati, Y. (2015). Studi literasi informasi mahasiswa ko-asisten Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro menggunakan the empowering eight model. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 4(2), 78–85. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/9509

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Oktavian, R., & Aldya, R. F. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran daring terintegrasi di era pendidikan 4.0. Didaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 20(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.30651/didaktis.v20i2.4763

Oludare Jethro, O., Moradeke Grace, A., & Kolawole Thomas, A. (2012). E-Learning and Its Effects on Teaching and Learning in a Global Age. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 2222–6990.

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning Journal, 21(3), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225

Rakhman, K. A., Saraha, A. R., & Sugrah, N. (2018). Basic competency of chemical practicum: Development and validation of assessment instruments. International Conference On Teaching and Learning, 1.

Setiaji, B., & Dinata, P. A. C. (2020). Analisis kesiapan mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan fisika menggunakan e-learning dalam situasi pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.31562

Setiawan, R., Mardapi, D., Pratama, A., & Ramadan, S. (2019). Efektivitas blended learning dalam inovasi pendidikan era industri 4.0 pada mata kuliah teori tes klasik. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.27259

Syah, R. H. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 pada pendidikan di Indonesia: Sekolah, keterampilan, dan proses pembelajaran. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i5.15314

Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2010). Virtual laboratory applications in chemistry education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 938–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.263

Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159–170. http://www.ifets.info/journals/16_1/14.pdf

Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. M. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5

Zheng, B., Lin, C., & Bae, J. (2020). Computers & Education The impact of learner- , instructor- , and course-level factors on online learning. Computers & Education, 150(January), 103851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103851

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v7i1.34149