Kinerja dosen di bidang penelitian dan publikasi ilmiah

Trie Hartiti Retnowati; Djemari Mardapi; Badrun Kartowagiran

doi:10.21831/amp.v6i2.21524

Kinerja dosen di bidang penelitian dan publikasi ilmiah

Trie Hartiti Retnowati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Djemari Mardapi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Badrun Kartowagiran, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/amp.v6i2.21524

Abstract

Keharusan publikasi ilmiah dari Pemerintah, dapat mendorong dosen untuk meningkatkan kualitas, kuantitas penelitian dan publikasi ilmiah. Sehubungan dengan hal ini, tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengeksplor kinerja dosen di bidang penelitian dan publikasi ilmiah. Informasi ini dapat digunakan oleh stakeholderuntuk melakukan pembinaan terhadap kinerja dosen. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei dan untuk mengumpulkan data digunakan kuesioner yang memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas tinggi, dilengkapi dengan teknik observasi. Pada tahap awal, responden penelitian ini adalah 92 dosen Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta yang terdiri dari 22 Asisten ahli, 26 Lektor, 28 Lektor Kepala, dan 16 Profesor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa selama tiga tahun terakhir skor kinerja dosen dalam bidang penelitian dan publikasi ilmiah untuk semua kelompok jabatan mengalami peningkatan, tetapi ada perbedaan skor kinerja dosen dalam penelitian dan publikasi ilmiah bila dilihat dari jabatan dosen. Guru Besar menduduki ranking tertinggi, baik untuk skor kinerja dosen dalam penelitian maupun publikasi ilmiah diikuti oleh Lektor Kepala, Lektor, dan Asisten Ahli.

Kata kunci: kinerja dosen, penelitian, publikasi ilmiah

LECTURERS’ PERFORMANCE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION

Abstract

The necessity of scientific publication insisted by the government can encourage lecturers to improve their scientific research and publication, both in quality and quantity. In connection with this fact, this research is aimed at exploring lecturers’ performance in terms of scientific research and publication. The information gained through the result of this study can be used by the stakeholder to develop the lecturers’ performance. This study is a survey research employing high-validity-and-reliability questionnaire to collect the data, completed with the employment of observation technique. At the initial stage, the respondents of the study were 92 lecturers of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta consisting of 22 instructors, 26 assistant professors, 28 associate professors, and 16 professors. The results of the study indicate that during the last three years, there is an increase on the total scientific research performance score and publication at every level of the functional position, but there is also a difference the scientific research performance score and publication seen from these functional positions. Professors are at the highest rank of the scientific research performance score and publication, followed by associate professors, assistant professors, and instructors.

Keywords: lecturers’ performance, scientific research, scientific publication

Keywords

kinerja dosen; penelitian; publikasi ilmiah

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: a stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Astuti, A. D. (2017). Pengaruh motivasi dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja guru SD di Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v5i2.13931

Bai, S., Rajput, Q., Hussain, S., & Khoja, S. A. (2014). Faculty performance evaluation system: An ontological approach. In 2014 IEEE/ACS 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (pp. 117–124). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2014.7073187

Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2012). Profesional development international. New York: Pearson.

Berk, R. A. (Ed.). (1986). Performance assessment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chia, S. Y. (2013). The ASEAN economic community: progress, challenges, and prospects. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/asean-economic-community-progress-challenges-and-prospects

Cronbach, L. J. (1985). Essential of psychological testing. New York: Harper and Ross.

Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newburry, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hemmings, B., & Hill, D. (2009). The development of lecturer research expertise: Towards a unifying model. Issues in Educational Research, 19(1).

Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2014). Lecturer self efficacy, research skills, and publication output. Sydney: Charles Sturt University.

Hutchinson, S. R., & Lovell, C. D. (2004). A Review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: implications for graduate research training. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000027392.94172.d2

Jones, J., Jenkin, M., & Lord, S. (2006). Developing effective teacher performance. California: SAGE Publishing Company.

Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria: ASCD.

Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Jabatan Fungsional Dosen Dan Angka Kreditnya (2013).

Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi (2015).

Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikantinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemberian Tunjangan Profesi Dosen dan Tunjangankehormatan Profesor (2017).

Mugimu, C. B., Nakabugo, M. G., & Katunguka, E. R. (2013). Developing capacity for research and teaching in higher education: a case of Makerere University. World Journal of Education, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n6p33

Peleyeju, J. O., & Ojebiyi, O. A. (2013). Lecturers’ performance appraisal and total quality management of Public Universities in South-Western Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 1(2), 41–47. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/journals/british-journal-of-education-bje/vol-1-issue-2-december-2013/lecturers-performance-appraisal-total-quality-management-public-universities-south-western-nigeria/

Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Suranto, S. (2017). Model evaluasi kinerja dosen: pengembangan instrumen untuk mengevaluasi kinerja dosen. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.16626

Rohmah, N., Huda, M., & Kusmintardjo, K. (2016). Strategi peningkatan kemampuan dosen dalam penulisan karya ilmiah (studi multi kasus pada Unisda dan Staidra di Kabupaten Lamongan). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(7). Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/6560

Stella, O. (2008). Motivation and work performance. Thesis. Unpublished. Master of Arts ini Human Resource and Employment of Institut of Sosial Studies. The Hague: ISS.

Sukirno. (2017). Modeling academic professional performance in higher education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education - IJESE, 12(8). Retrieved from http://www.ijese.net/makale/1933

Yen, W. M. (1993). Scaling performance assessments: strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(3), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v6i2.21524