Analysis of 4C's Ability in the Implementation of Online Learning in Elementary Schools

Helda Kusuma Wardani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Suhartono Suhartono, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

Abstract


The goal of this study was to describe the 4 C's ability to implement the 2020/2021 odd semester learning at Jitu State Elementary School in Sidoarjo Regency. The research location, which is included in the countryside, is intended to obtain a qualitative picture of the ability of the 4 C's in elementary schools, most of which are rural. Qualitative research with a descriptive narrative research design is applied. The result is that during this pandemic, there is a reality that online learning does not allow the realization of the collaborative abilities of all classes. Critical thinking skills, creative thinking, and communication are planned and implemented in learning. The ability of students who study under the guidance of their parents at home decreases compared to face-to-face learning. The teacher marks the existence of student work that parents do. Individual learning causes a decline in students' critical thinking, creative thinking, and verbal communicative skills, although the three skills (creative thinking, critical thinking, and communication) are still visible in students. The impact of learning with individual assignments on students shows a significant decrease in the 4 C's ability.

 

Keywords: 4 C's, learning, critical thinking, creative thinking, elementary school

 

 ==================================================

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan kemampuan 4 C’s dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran semester ganjil 2020/2021 Sekolah Dasar Negeri Jitu Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Lokasi penelitian yang termasuk pedesaan dimaksudkan agar diperoleh gambaran kualitatif dari kemampuan 4 C’s di Sekolah Dasar yang mayoritas ada di daerah pedesaan. Penelitian kualitatif dengan desain penelitian naratif deskriptif diterapkan. Hasilnya pada masa pandemic ini ada realita bahwa pembelajaran dalam jaringan tidak memungkinkan diwujudkannya aspek kemampuan kolaboratif semua kelas. Aspek kemampuan berpikir kritis, berpikir kreatif, dan komunikasi terencana dan terlaksana dalam pembelajaran. Kemampuan siswa yang belajar dibimbing orangtua di rumah menurun dibanding saat pembelajaran tatap muka. Guru menandai adanya pekerjaan siswa yang dikerjakan orangtua. Pembelajaran individual menyebabkan menurunnya keterampilan berpikir kritis, keterampilan berpikir kreatif, dan keterampilan komunikatif verbal siswa, walaupun ketiga keterampilan (berpikir kreatif, berpikir kritis, komunikasi) masih terlihat pada diri siswa. Dampak pembelajaran dengan penugasan individual pada diri siswa menampakkan penurunan kemampuan 4 C’s sigifikan.

 

Kata kunci: 4 C's, learning, critical thinking, creative thinking, sekolah dasar

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning to Teach 10th eds. USA: Mc Graw Hill.

Azhari, A., & Somakim, S. (2014). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematik siswa melalui pendekatan konstruktivisme di kelas VII sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) negeri 2 Banyuasin III. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 1–12.

Chiruguru, S. B., & Chiruguru, S. (2020). The essential skills of 21st century classroom (4Cs). Shingania University Https://Www. Researchgate. Net/Publication/340066140_The_Essential_Skills_of_21st_Century _Classroom_4Cs.

Hammond, L. D., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Retrieved November 10, 2019.

Haryanto, R. (2019). Tranformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Melalui Rumah Belajar. Tersedia Di Http://Pena. Belajar. Kemdikbud. Go. Id/2019/07/Tranformasi-Pendidikan-Abad-21-Melalui-Rumah-Belajar/. Diakses Pada, 30.

Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st Century Skills: evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts.

Kivunja, C. (2015). Exploring the pedagogical meaning and implications of the 4Cs" super skills" for the 21st century through Bruner’s 5E lenses of knowledge construction to improve pedagogies of the new learning paradigm. Creative Education.

NEA. (2019, Desember 7). National Education Association.2010.Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educators guide to the

Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments. Educational Research and Innovation, OECD: Paris, France.

Pribadi, B. A. (2018). Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Penerbit Dian Rakyat.

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sloane, P. (2017). The leader’s guide to lateral thinking skills: unlock the creativity and innovation in you and your team. Kogan Page Publishers.

Sugiyono, P. D. (2015). Metode penelitian dan pengembangan. Res. Dev. D, 2015, 39–41.

Suhartono, S., Murti, T., & Artikasari, A. (2017). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Pilihan Aktivitas Belajar (Pab) Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas IV SD. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 26(2), 182–192.

Sutanto, P. (2017). Panduan implementasi kecakapan abad 21 Kurikulum 2013 di SMA. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Zubaidah, S. (2018). Mengenal 4C: Learning and innovation skills untuk menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0. 2nd Science Education National Conference, 13, 1–18.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v5i1.45301

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v5i1.45301.g17999

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Helda Kusuma Wardani, suhartono suhartono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DIDAKTIKA has been abstracted and indexed by

View Didaktika Stats