Analisis Butir Soal untuk Materi Gaya di Sekolah Dasar

Gibta Paskalin, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
Maria Melani Ika Susanti, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia

Abstract


Item analysis was conducted to assess the quality of items in the style material in grade IV elementary school. To achieve this goal, four points were examined in this study, including (1) item validity, (2) reliability, (3) difficulty level, and (4) item discrimination power. This research is a quantitative descriptive research. The subjects of this study were 27 grade IV students at Kentungan Elementary School in February 2020. Quantitative data analysis techniques were carried out to determine the validity, reliability, difficulty level, and distinguishing features using the SPSS 17 application program. The results of this study were: (1 ) there are 15 valid questions in each cycle, (2) the level of reliability in the high category both in cycle I and cycle II, (3) in cycle I, there are 8 easy questions, 6 medium questions, and 1 difficult problem, whereas in cycle II, there are 8 easy questions and 7 moderate questions, (4) Related to the power of distinguishing questions, in cycle I, there are 8 questions in the excellent category, 6 good questions, and 1 sufficient problem, whereas in cycle II, there are 14 good questions and 1 question is enough.

 

Keywords: item analysis, validity, reliability, item difficulty level, item discrimination power


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Basuki, I. dan Hariyanto. (2014). Asesmen pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Darmawan, R. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Daryanto, H. (2017). Evakuasi pendidikan: komponen MKDK. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Herwin. (2019). Evaluasi program pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 126 Lagoe. Didaktika Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, Vol. 2. No. 2.

Hofmeister, P., Jaeger, T. F., Arnon, I., Sag, I. A., & Snider, N. (2013). The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1-2), 48-87.

Jihad, A. & Abdul H. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Kusaeri dan Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational research methods, 11(4), 815-852.

Martini, S. (2019). Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa pada materi energi gerakan melalui model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) pada siswa sekolah dasar. Didaktika Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, Vol 2. No. 2.

Masidjo. (1995). Penilaian pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di sekolah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Pidekso, A. (2009). SPSS 17 untuk pengolahan data statistik. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.

Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rusdiana & Elis R. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Sani, R.A. (2016). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Subali, B. (2012). Prinsip asesmen & evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Susetyo, B. (2011). Menyusun tes hasil belajar. Bandung: CV Cakra.

Uno, H.B. & Satria, K. (2012). Assessment pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Waddington, C. (2001). Different methods of evaluating student translations: The question of validity. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal, 46(2), 311-325.

Widoyoko, E.S. (2009). Evaluasi dan program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wu, J., King, K. M., Witkiewitz, K., Racz, S. J., & McMahon, R. J. (2012). Item analysis and differential item functioning of a brief conduct problem screen. Psychological assessment, 24 (2), 444.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v3i1.31431

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v3i1.31431.g14108

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2020 Gibta Paskalin, Maria Melani Ika Susanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DIDAKTIKA has been abstracted and indexed by

View Didaktika Stats