The Role of Corporate Governance in Financial Fraud Prevention: A Systematic Literature Review
Downloads
This study systematically examines corporate governance mechanisms and their effectiveness in preventing financial fraud across diverse organizational contexts. The findings reveal that governance effectiveness is highly context-dependent, influenced by industry type, firm size, and regulatory environment. Tailored governance strategies incorporating structural oversight and cultural dimensions significantly reduce fraud risk. Moreover, regulatory frameworks and enforcement practices must strike a balance to maintain managerial motivation while ensuring accountability. Emerging governance challenges such as digitalization, board political connections, and stakeholder inclusivity require further empirical investigation. The study contributes to the literature by advocating integrated governance frameworks that combine formal and informal elements, offering insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to enhance fraud mitigation. These findings are important for developing adaptive, context-sensitive governance models that effectively address contemporary fraud risks.
Keywords: Audit Committees, Board Composition, Corporate Governance, Financial Fraud Prevention, Fraud Mitigation Strategies
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini secara sistematis mengkaji mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan dan efektivitasnya dalam mencegah penipuan keuangan di berbagai konteks organisasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas tata kelola sangat dipengaruhi oleh konteks, termasuk jenis industri, ukuran perusahaan, dan lingkungan regulasi. Strategi tata kelola yang disesuaikan dengan mengintegrasikan pengawasan struktural dan dimensi budaya secara signifikan mengurangi risiko penipuan. Selain itu, kerangka regulasi dan praktik penegakan harus menyeimbangkan motivasi manajerial dan akuntabilitas. Tantangan tata kelola baru seperti digitalisasi, koneksi politik dewan, dan inklusivitas pemangku kepentingan membutuhkan penelitian empiris lebih lanjut. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi dengan mendorong kerangka tata kelola terpadu yang menggabungkan elemen formal dan informal serta memberikan wawasan bagi peneliti dan praktisi untuk meningkatkan mitigasi penipuan. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi penting dalam pengembangan model tata kelola yang adaptif dan sensitif konteks untuk mengatasi risiko penipuan kontemporer.
Kata Kunci: Komite Audit, Komposisi Dewan, Tata Kelola Perusahaan, Pencegahan Penipuan Keuangan, Strategi Mitigasi Penipuan
Downloads
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations. https://legacy.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024/
Bader, A. A., Abu Hajar, Y. A., Weshah, S. R. S., & Almasri, B. K. (2024). Predicting Risk of and Motives behind Fraud in Financial Statements of Jordanian Industrial Firms Using Hexagon Theory. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030120
Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248566
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441
Bowe, M., & Jobome, G. (2001). Regulating securities fraud: Evidence from unauthorised trading cases. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 9(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025070
Capraş, I. L., & Achim, M. V. (2024). Analysis and Classification of Corporate Fraud Based on the Literature and Investigated Cases in Romania. Studies in Business and Economics, 19(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2024-0031
Chambers, R. (2006). Corporate secrecy: The final barrier to corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 2(1–2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706822
Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002
Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2016). Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(4), 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2390-6
Coram, P., Ferguson, C., & Moroney, R. (2008). Internal audit, alternative internal audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud. Accounting and Finance, 48(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00247.x
Donker, H., & Zahir, S. (2008). Towards an impartial and effective corporate governance rating system. Corporate Governance, 8(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810853428
Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2024). How pervasive is corporate fraud? Review of Accounting Studies, 29(1), 736–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09738-5
Firth, M., Rui, O. M., & Wu, W. (2011). Cooking the books: Recipes and costs of falsified financial statements in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.09.002
Ghafoor, A., Zainudin, R., & Mahdzan, N. S. (2019). Corporate fraud and information asymmetry in emerging markets: Case of firms subject to enforcement actions in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2017-0107
Halbouni, S. S., Obeid, N., & Garbou, A. (2016). Corporate governance and information technology in fraud prevention and detection: Evidence from the UAE. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6–7), 589–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2015-1163
Harford, J., Kecskés, A., & Mansi, S. (2018). Do long-term investors improve corporate decision making? Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 424–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.022
Hassan, S. W. U., Kiran, S., Gul, S., Khatatbeh, I. N., & Zainab, B. (2025). The perception of accountants/auditors on the role of corporate governance and information technology in fraud detection and prevention. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2023-0235
Hudson, R. (2024). Responding to incentives or gaming the system? How UK business academics respond to the Academic Journal Guide. Research Policy, 53(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105082
Ivanova, M. N., & Prencipe, A. (2023). The Effects of Board Interlocks With an Allegedly Fraudulent Company on Audit Fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 38(2), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X20971947
Kim, D. S., & Lee, S. H. (2023). Board political connections and financial fraud: The case of business groups in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09902-8
Li, X., Kim, J. B., Wu, H., & Yu, Y. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Fraud: The Moderating Effects of Governance and Religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04378-3
Mandal, A., & S., A. (2025). Preventing financial statement fraud in the corporate sector: insights from auditors. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0101
Martinov-Bennie, N. (2007). What we might learn about fraud and corporate governance from NAB’s annus horribilis. Australian Accounting Review, 17(43), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00340.x
Marzuki, M. M., Haji-Abdullah, N. M., Othman, R., Wahab, E. A. A., & Harymawan, I. (2019). Audit committee characteristics, board diversity, and fraudulent financial reporting in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.2.7
Morrison, M. A. (2004). Rush to judgement: The lynching of Arthur Anderson & Co. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(3), 335–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2004.01.001
Mousavi, M., Zimon, G., Salehi, M., & Stępnicka, N. (2022). The Effect of Corporate Governance Structure on Fraud and Money Laundering. Risks, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090176
Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2018). Whistle blowing intentions – evidence from Malaysian PLC. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(5), 1111–1125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2017-0096
Nindito, M., Avianti, I., Koeswayo, P. S., & Tanzil, N. D. (2025). Guardians of Integrity: Exploring The Role of Corporate Governance in Preventing Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 14(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv14i1art10
Novatiani, R. A., Afiah, N. N., & Sumantri, R. (2022). Risk Management and Other Factors Preventing Fraudulent Financial Reporting by State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 12(8), 686–711. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v12i8.4587
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ (Vol. 372). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Mckenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ (Vol. 372). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Persons, O. S. (2010). Could investors use voluntary ethics disclosure to assess the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2009.24
Popa (Sabău), A., Achim, M. V, & Teusdea, A. C. (2024). Corporate governance and financial fraud occurrence – case study on Romanian companies. Journal of Risk Finance, 25(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-10-2023-0257
Raval, V. (2018). A Disposition-Based Fraud Model: Theoretical Integration and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3199-2
Rizwan, S., & Chughtai, S. (2023). Reestablishing the legitimacy after fraud: does corporate governance structure matter? South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 12(4), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-08-2020-0286
Shi, W., Connelly, B. L., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). External corporate governance and financial fraud: cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1268–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2560
Siahaan, M., Suharman, H., Fitrijanti, T., & Umar, H. (2024). When internal organizational factors improve detecting corruption in state-owned companies. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(2), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2022-0292
Thompson, R. B., & Thomas, R. S. (2004). The public and private faces of derivative lawsuits. Vanderbilt Law Review, 57(5), 1747–1793. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/public-private-faces-derivative-lawsuits/docview/198929116/se-2
Thuy, L. T. T. (2025). Determinants of internal audit effectiveness and its mediating role in fraud prevention. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6230
Utami, W., Nugroho, L., Mappanyuki, R., & Yelvionita, V. (2020). Early warning fraud determinants in banking industries. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(6), 604–627. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2020.106.604.627
Wang, P. (2010). Restructuring to repair legitimacy - A contingency perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00782.x
Wu, F., Cao, J., & Zhang, X. (2023). Do non-executive employees matter in curbing corporate financial fraud? Journal of Business Research, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113922
Xu, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, H. (2018). Board age and corporate financial fraud: An interactionist view. Long Range Planning, 51(6), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.08.001
Xue, S., Tang, Y., Xu, Y., Ling, C. D., Xie, X. Y., & Mo, S. (2024). How boards’ factional faultlines affect corporate financial fraud. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(1), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09859-0
Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.035
Yao, S., Zhao, W., Sensoy, A., Cheng, F., & Goodell, J. W. (2021). The dark side of marital leadership: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101844
Yiu, D. W., Wan, W. P., & Xu, Y. (2019). Alternative Governance and Corporate Financial Fraud in Transition Economies: Evidence From China. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2685–2720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318764296
Yiu, D. W., Xu, Y., & Wan, W. P. (2014). The deterrence effects of vicarious punishments on corporate financial fraud. Organization Science, 25(5), 1549–1571. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0904
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizky Ridho Dwinanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Nominal Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Generic License.
Terjemahan.png)
