Improving student learning outcomes through collaboration of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Jigsaw learning models

Fadli Agus Triansyah; Hasyim Hasyim; Sri Mutmainnah

doi:10.21831/jppfa.v10i2.56231

Improving student learning outcomes through collaboration of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Jigsaw learning models

Fadli Agus Triansyah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Hasyim Hasyim, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Sri Mutmainnah, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

10.21831/jppfa.v10i2.56231

Abstract

The problem in this study is the low student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the increase in student learning outcomes using the collaborative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Jigsaw in the Correspondence subject at SMK Negeri 1 Medan in the 2022/2023 academic year. This research uses using experimental method. This study's population was all class X AP students at SMK Negeri 1 Medan, totaling 144 people consisting of 4 classes. The sample in this study consisted of 2 courses, Class X AP-1 (Experimental), totaling 36 people, and X AP-2 (Control), totaling 36 people. The research instrument used to collect data was an objective test in the form of multiple choice, which destroyed 20 questions that had tested for validity with four answer choices. The data analysis showed that the experimental class's average value was 79.3, with a standard deviation of 8.38. At the same time, the average value of the Control class is 73.9, with a standard deviation of 7.94. Hypothesis testing was carried out using the t-test with dk = n1 + n2 – 2 at a significant level of 95%. From the calculation of the hypothesis obtained a tcount of 3.008 and ttable 1.6684. The results of hypothesis testing show that t count > t table (3.008 > 1.6684), then the hypothesis is accepted. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that there was an increase in student learning outcomes using the collaborative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Jigsaw by 39.47% in the Class X AP Correspondence subject at SMK Negeri 1 Medan in the 2022/2023 academic year.

Keywords

Collaboration; Jigsaw learning model; student learning outcomes; Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) learning model

References

Bartanen, B., Rogers, L. K., & Woo, D. S. (2021). Assistant Principal Mobility and Its Relationship With Principal Turnover. Educational Researcher, 50(6), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X21993105

Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results

Elpisah, E., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2019). Student team achievement division (Stad) model in increasing economic learning outcomes. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 3089–3092.

Endo, T., Chiba, G., van Rooijen, W. F. G., Yamanaka, M., & Pyeon, C. H. (2018). Experimental analysis and uncertainty quantification using random sampling technique for ADS experiments at KUCA. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 55(4), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1403387

Flores, R., Lillo, R., & Romo, J. (2018). Homogeneity test for functional data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 45(5), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2017.1319470

Jankowski, K. R. B., Flannelly, K. J., & Flannelly, L. T. (2018). The t -test: An Influential Inferential Tool in Chaplaincy and Other Healthcare Research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 24(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2017.1335050

Jobst, L. J., Auerswald, M., & Moshagen, M. (2022). The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(5), 911–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211046201

Kılıç, S., Tan, M. N., & Mevsim, V. (2021). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the craving experience questionnaire in the assessment of cigarette smoking. Journal of Substance Use, 26(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2020.1851403

Lee, A., & Griffin, C. C. (2021). Exploring online learning modules for teaching universal design for learning (UDL): preservice teachers’ lesson plan development and implementation. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1884494

Li, J., & Xue, E. (2022). Meta-conceptualizing the high-quality education system: Insight from China. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2118577

Liu, C., & Jurich, D. (2023). Outlier Detection Using t-test in Rasch IRT Equating under NEAT Design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 47(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221124045

Liu, Y., & Zheng, B. (2022). Comparability of difficulty levels of translation tasks in CET-6 parallel test forms: evidence from product and process-based data. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 16(4), 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2022.2036938

Mathews, H. M. (2021). Developing a Theory of Program Vision as Professional Socialization in Special Education Teacher Preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 088840642110589. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211058901

O’Leary, N., Barber, A., & Keane, H. (2019). Physical education undergraduate students’ perceptions of their learning using the jigsaw learning method. European Physical Education Review, 25(3), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18767302

Partin, R. D., Meldrum, R. C., Lehmann, P. S., Back, S., & Trucco, E. M. (2022). Low Self-Control and Cybercrime Victimization: An Examination of Indirect Effects Through Risky Online Behavior. Crime & Delinquency, 68(13–14), 2476–2502. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211061728

Psaradakis, Z., & Vávra, M. (2020). Normality tests for dependent data: large-sample and bootstrap approaches. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 49(2), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1485941

Rahimi, S., Ahmadian, M., Amerian, M., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2020). Comparing Accuracy and Durability Effects of Jigsaw Versus Input Flood Tasks on the Recognition of Regular Past Tense /-ed/. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402091950. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919505

Sadowska, N., & Laffy, D. (2019). Measuring the impact of strategic design learning experience long after the classroom delivery. The Design Journal, 22(sup1), 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594957

Sakthivel, V. P., Suman, M., & Sathya, P. D. (2020). Squirrel search algorithm for economic dispatch with valve-point effects and multiple fuels. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 15(6), 351–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2020.1803451

Shi, W., You, Y., Shao, P., & Wan, Y. (2014). Standard deviation of line objects in geographic information science. Annals of GIS, 20(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2013.862297

Sun, S., Li, Z., & Jiang, H. (2022). Homogeneity test and sample size of risk difference for stratified unilateral and bilateral data. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2022.2142240

Virkkula, E. (2022). Student teachers’ views of competence goals in vocational teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1806229

West, R. M. (2021). Best practice in statistics: Use the Welch t -test when testing the difference between two groups. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 58(4), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563221992088

Xiao, L., & Hau, K.-T. (2022). Performance of Coefficient Alpha and Its Alternatives: Effects of Different Types of Non-Normality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 001316442210882. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221088240

Yuliani, N. (2019). The Role of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) in Improving Student’s Learning Outcomes. Classroom Action Research Journal, 3(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.17977/um013v3i12019p008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v10i2.56231