Developing PBL E-Learning with the Brainwriting Method to Improve HOTS and Learning Interest in the Circulatory System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v14i1.92926Keywords:
Brainwriting, E-Learning, HOTS, Learning interests, Problem-based learningAbstract
This study aims to determine the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of PBL e-learning using the brainwriting method to enhance students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and learning interest. This research employs a research and development approach using the ADDIE model. The research instruments included media validation sheets from material and media experts, questionnaires, observation sheets, and test questions. The research results are as follows: (1) PBL e-learning with the brainwriting method is feasible for enhancing students’ HOTS and learning interest; (2) this e-learning is practical for use in learning activities, as indicated by assessments from students and teachers, with a practicality score of 98, categorized as “very practical”; and (3) this e-learning is effective in improving students’ HOTS and learning interest, as shown by the MANOVA test results, with a significance value of 0.000 (< 0.05). These findings suggest that integrating Problem-Based Learning (PBL) with the brainwriting method in an e-learning environment can be an effective instructional strategy to foster higher-order thinking skills and increase students’ engagement in biology learning. Furthermore, this study contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 4 (Quality Education), by promoting inclusive, innovative, and technology-enhanced learning practices that support the development of critical thinking skills essential for lifelong learning in the 21st century.
References
Adam, R. J., & Khoo, S.-T. (1996). ACER Quest: The Interactive Test Analysis System. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Al-Saleh, N. (2022). Brainwriting versus brainstorming: Effects on idea generation, participation equity, and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101034.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101034
Arsanti, I. A., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2020). Efektifitas Problem-Based Learning dengan Brainwriting berbasis Masalah Diversifikasi Pangan terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Berkomunikasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9 (2), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v9i2.17371
Bellas, F., Naya-Varela, M., Mallo, A., et al. (2024). Education in the AI era: a long-term classroom technology based on intelligent robotics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1425. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03953-y
Berlina, S. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah (PBL) Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) Pada Konsep Sistem Peredaran Darah (Kuasi Eksperimen di SMAN 10 Tangerang Selatan) (Undergraduate thesis), Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Bond, T. G., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2023). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (4th ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003277646
Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2024). Advances in Rasch measurement for educational research: Implications for validity and reliability interpretation. Journal of Applied Measurement, 25(1), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.37513/jam.2024.25101
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (Vol. 722). New York: Springer.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Ascd.
Fathurrohman, M. (2015). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Alternatif Desain Pembelajaran Yang Menyenangkan. Jogjakarta : Ar-ruzz Media.
Fisher, W. P., Jr., & Wright, B. D. (2022). The role of reliability in Rasch measurement: Distinguishing measurement precision from test consistency. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 35(4), 1885–1889.
https://doi.org/10.37513/rmt.35.4.1
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Iksan, M. (2018). Pelatihan Pembelajaran Berbasis E-Learning. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Membangun Negeri, 2(2), 128-133. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=qNyfR6UAAAAJ&citation_for_view=qNyfR6UAAAAJ:TFP_iSt0sucC
Khairani, R., & Aloysius, S. (2023). How does PBL Brainwriting Method Supplemented with Concept Mapping Effective to Improve Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Ability?. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 9(3), 1030-1038. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.3212
Komariah, N., Mujasam, M., Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2019). Pengaruh penerapan model pbl berbantuan media google classroom terhadap HOTS, motivasi dan minat peserta didik. Silampari Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Fisika, 1(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.31540/sjpif.v1i2.788
Linacre, J. M. (2023). Reliability and separation: A Rasch perspective. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 37(1), 2010–2013.
https://doi.org/10.37513/rmt.37.1.2
Lufri dan Ardi. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian: Penelitian Kuantitatif, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, dan Penelitian Pengembangan. Padang: UNP Press.
Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813
Mulyani, F., dan Haliza, N. (2021). Analisis Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi (IPTEK) Dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 3(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v3i1.1432
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD Education at a Glance 2025. OECD Publishing.
Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2022). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive–social–motivational perspective of brainwriting. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101385.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101385
Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., & Arditti, L. E. (2023). Group creativity in digital environments: The role of idea generation methods. Small Group Research, 54(4), 497–523.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964231155927
Pratama, D. (2020). Analisis kualitas tes buatan guru melalui pendekatan item response theory (IRT) model rasch. Tarbawy: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v7i1.1187
Purwanti, N. K., & Sumandya, I. W. (2019). Penerapan Partial Credit Model (PCM) dalam Mengevaluasi Tes Uraian. Jurnal EMASAINS. VII (1). 77-85. https://doi.org/10.59672/emasains.v8i1.274
Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & Vreede, T. de. (2023). Creativity and idea generation in digital collaboration: Comparing written and verbal techniques. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107503.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107503
Safitri, A. N., Anas, M., & Suama, I. W. (2021). Pengembangan Learning Management System (LMS) Berbasis Google Classroom untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar IPA Pada Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 15 Kota Kendari. Jurnal Biofiskim: ISSN, 2684, 995X. https://doi.org/10.33772/biofiskim.v3i2.21927
Sain, Z. H., Baskara, R., & Vorfi Lama, A. (2024). Rethinking pedagogy in the digital age: analyzing the effectiveness of e-learning strategies in higher education. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Research, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.55537/jistr.v3i1.772
Santika, I. G. N. (2021). Grand Desain Kebijakan Strategis Pemerintah Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Untuk Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Education and development, 9(2), 369-377. https//doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i2.2500
Sam, N. E., & Idrus, R. (2021). Pengembangan Media E-Learning Berbasis Learning Management System (LMS) di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4271-4280. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1503
Saputra, D. A., & Nofrion, N. (2022). Pengembangan LMS Berbasis Google Sites Untuk Mengembangkan HOTS Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi. Jurnal PIPSI (Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia), 7(3), 206-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jpipsi.v7i3.3147
Sari, Y., P., & Aminatum, T. (2021). Keefektifan Model Problem-Based Learning Pencemaran Limbah Batik dengan Metode Brainwriting Berbasis Belnded Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kegigihan Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas X. Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2022). Computers in education: A meta-analysis of technology-supported engagement. Computers & Education, 177, 104383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104383
Tri, N. M., Hoang, P. D., & Dung, N. T. (2021). Impact of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 on Higher Education in Vietnam: Challenges and Opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1350
Wicaksana, E. J., Atmadja, P., & Muthia, G. A. (2020). E-learning Edmodo Dengan Model PBL untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 22-29. http;//dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v12i1p22-29
Xie, K., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2023). Learner participation patterns in online discussion forums and their relationship to cognitive engagement. Computers & Education, 194, 104692.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Generic License.


