Studi Komparatif Topik Tabung dalam Buku Teks Singapura dan Indonesia: Implikasi untuk Literasi Matematika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v14i1.89010Keywords:
Analisis Deskriptif Komparatif, Buku teks matematika, Literasi matematika, TabungAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan tiga buku teks matematika-Kurikulum Merdeka, Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP), dan The Singapore O-Level Curriculum-pada materi tabung dalam konteks literasi matematika. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif-komparatif dengan analisis konten terhadap struktur materi, fakta, konsep, prinsip, distribusi soal berdasarkan taksonomi Bloom, soal pemecahan masalah, dan kesesuaian soal dengan framework PISA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa buku teks kurikulum merdeka lebih menekankan konsep dasar namun miskin konteks dan variasi soal, buku teks KTSP mulai mengintegrasikan konteks nyata dan prinsip skalabilitas meski visualisasi terbatas, sedangkan buku teks The Singapore O-Level Curriculum unggul dalam visualisasi, variasi soal kognitif tinggi, serta proporsi soal pemecahan masalah dan konteks PISA yang seimbang. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa buku teks dengan materi visual, kontekstual, dan soal beragam lebih efektif meningkatkan literasi matematika siswa. Implikasinya, pengembangan buku teks perlu mengacu pada kerangka literasi matematika internasional agar pembelajaran matematika di Indonesia lebih relevan dan kompetitif.
References
Abdullah, A. H., Shin, B. (2019). A Comparative Study Of Quadrilaterals Topic Content In Mathematics Textbooks Between Malaysia And South Korea. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7572.315-340
Agus, Nuniek Avianti. (2008). Mudah belajar matematika 3: untuk kelas IX Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Ahmad Wachidul Kohar, Achmad Dhany Fachruddin, & Soffil Widadah. (2021). Facilitating students’ multiple intelligences through RME: A learning trajectory of volume and surface area measurement. Inomatika, 3(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v3i1.248
Angela Fitri, J., Sumardi, H., & Susanto, E. (2021). Analisis buku teks matematika kelas VII semester II kurikulum 2013 terbitan erlangga berdasarkan pendekatan saintifik. Didactical Mathematics, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v3i2.1351
Ariyanto, R. O., Mardiyana, & Siswanto. (2020). Characteristics of mathematics high order thinking skill problems levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012012
Bittar, M. (2022). A Methodological Proposal For Textbook Analysis. ScholarWorks at University of Montana. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol19/iss2/2/
Cao, W., & Dong, Y. (2024). Comparative study of high school mathematics textbooks from the perspective of core literacy—a case study of the sequence section in the 2019 People’s Education Press Edition A and the Nan I Book Company edition. Pure Mathematics, 14(06), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12677/pm.2024.146220
Fahmida Bibi, Sana Ullah, & Asghar Ullah Khan. (2024). Strategies for enhancing the use of bloom’s taxonomy in curriculum management in khyber pakhtunkhwa, pakistan. Administrative and Management Sciences Journal, 3(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.59365/amsj.3(1).2024.131
Fasinu, V., Sibanda, A., & Machaba, M. F. (2024). Grade 8 learners’ perceptions and misconceptions on their learning of surface area and volume in mathematics. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 13. https://doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.13.377-400
Giawa, F., Siregar, J. M., & Armanto, D. (2023). Analysis of the cognitive level of competency test questions in junior high school mathematics textbooks based on the revised bloom taxonomy. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 3(04), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v3i04.607
Gökçek, T., & Çelik, S. (2020). A meta-synthesis study of research about mathematic textbooks. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 10(4), 1247–1288. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.038
Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2023). Praxeology review: Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2229. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953
Jannah, R. R., Waluya, St. B., Asikin, M., & Zaenuri, Z. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PJBL) Terhadap kemampuan literasi matematika siswa. IJoIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.59525/ijois.v2i2.43
Julia, A., Safrudiannur, S., & Watulingas, J. R. (2022). Analisis Soal-soal Latihan dalam Buku Teks Matematika SMP Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura pada Materi Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel. JPIn: Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia, 5(2), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.47165/jpin.v5i2.362
Julie, H. (2017). Developing learning trajectory based instruction of the volume and surface area of the block. Proceedings of the 5th SEA-DR (South East Asia Development Research) International Conference 2017 (SEADRIC 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/seadric-17.2017.84
Kaerudin, D. D., Lestiana, H. T., & Heryandi, Y. (2023). Analisis Komparasi Buku Teks Matematika Indonesia dan Singapura pada Topik Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. CIRCLE : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(01), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.28918/circle.v3i01.6873
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Matematika Fase A - F untuk SD/MI/Program Paket A, SMP/MTs/Program Paket B, dan SMA/MA/Program Paket C [PDF]. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/file/cp/dasmen/10.%20CP%20Matematika.pdf
Keung, C. W., Da, H., & Min, N. K. (2020). New Discovering Mathematics 1B. Singapura : Star Publishing Pte Ltd.
Khoerunisa, A., Nurjanah, N., & Suryadi, D. (2024). Analisis komparasi buku matematika Indonesia dan Singapura pada materi persamaan kuadrat. Pythagoras: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.33373/pyth.v13i2.6467
Kuncoro, K. S., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Jupri, A. (2024). Praxeological analysis in Indonesian and Singaporean mathematics textbooks: An understanding geometrical similarity by students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1197-1218
Kristanto, Y. D., Taqiyuddin, M., Yulfiana, E., & Rukmana, I. (2022). Matematika untuk SMP/MTs Kelas IX. Jakarta : Pusat Perbukuan, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Lestiana, H., Maula, L., & Winarso, W. (2023). Comparative Analysis Of Pythagorean Problems In Indonesian And Singaporean Mathematics Textbooks: An Overview Of Cognitive Level, Representation Form, Contextual Feature, And Response Type. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2023v26n1i15
Manopo, M., & Lisarani, V. (2021). Comparative analysis of non-routine problems in mathematics textbooks of Indonesia and Singapore. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v4i1.750
Marina, R., Zulkardi, Z., Susanti, E., & Meryansumayeka, M. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Perbandingan Menggunakan Konteks Jajanan Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 13(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v13i1.79495
Muhassanah, N., & Winarni, A. (2023). Analysis of problem-solving ability based on Polya stages of Open University students in mathematics courses. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.24090/ijrme.v1i1.8618
Muslich, M. (2010). Textbook Writing, Dasar-dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
Muslimah, H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berbentuk Soal Cerita. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 8(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v8i1.30000
Nurhikmayati, I., Darhim, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Wijaya, T. T. (2025). A comparison of Indonesia and Singapore secondary school textbooks of mathematics: A praxeological analysis of cube and cuboid task design. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.6.1.65
Nursyahidah, F., Albab, I. U., & Saputro, B. A. (2021). Learning cylinder through the context of Giant Lopis tradition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042086
Nurwahid, M., & Ashar, S. (2022). A literature review: Efforts to overcome student’s mathematical literacy. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 6(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol6-iss2/666
Ocumen, M. R., & Callaman, R. A. (2025). Understanding the mathematics curriculum of the Philippine and Singapore education systems: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(II), 1765–1777. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.9020143
OECD. (2018). PISA for Development mathematics framework. In PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science (pp. 49-71). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-5-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1234abcd-en
Perovano, A., Amaral, R., & Mazzi, L. (2023). Weaving reflections on critical awareness and the choice of Mathematics textbook. Revista Internacional de Pesquisa em Educação Matemática. https://doi.org/10.37001/ripem.v13i4.3645
Pratama, F. I., & Rohaeti, E. (2024). How does “chemistry challenge” e-book affect the chemical literacy profile? A study to test learning media effectiveness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7018
Putri, A. K., Fahrunisa, A. H., Evriliani, A. S., Volosa, E., & Nahadi, N. (2024). Transforming chemistry learning through the development of higher order thinking based on revised bloom’s taxonomy: A systematic review. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(3), 589. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i3.12452
Purnomo, Y. W., Fatima, Y. M., Amiroh, A., Mawaddah, F., Prananto, I. W., & Firdaus, F. M. (2023). Comparative study of elementary school mathematics textbooks between Singapore and Indonesia: The case of fractions. Acta Scientiae, 25(4), 284–313. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7446
Purnomo, Y., Mastura, F., & Perbowo, K. (2019). Contextual Features of Geometrical Problems in Indonesian Mathematics Textbooks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012048.
Rasyidi, D. A., & Winarso, W. (2020). The proportion of cognitive aspects of question in mathematics textbook based on Marzano's taxonomy: An Indonesian case in implementing new curriculum. EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7374
Rojas, E., Benakli, N. (2020). Mathematical Literacy and Critical Thinking. In: But, J. (eds) Teaching College-Level Disciplinary Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39804-0_8
Saleha, A. N., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2022). Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa Menggunakan Soal PISA Konteks Vaksinasi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 10(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v10i2.45818
Sanina, S. P., & Sokolov, V. L. (2021). Approaches to the typology of the common mistakes of younger schoolchildren in the development of mathematical concepts. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 10(4), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100413
Sianturi, I. A., & Yang, D.C. (2017). An analysis of Singaporean versus Indonesian textbooks based on trigonometry content. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a
Syaali, R., Lestari, W., Salsabila, I. D., & Uki Sajiman, S. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan literasi siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika pada materi bangun ruang sisi Lengkung. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(6), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v4i6.1892
Syahri Ramdhani, S., Susanti, R., & Meilinda. (2024). Cognitive Level of Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) Questions Based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.785
Syakrani, A. W., Malik, Abd., Hasbullah, H., Budi, M., & Maulidan, M. R. (2022). Sistem Pendidikan Di Negara Singapura. Adiba : Journal Of Education, 2(4), 517–527.
Syam, S. S., Wijaya, A., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Comparison of modelling tasks in Indonesian and Singaporean mathematics textbooks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012057
Temel, H., & Altun, M. (2022). The Effect of Problem-Solving Strategies Education on Developing Mathematical Literacy. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1164584.
Ummah, N. R., Sugeng, S., & Safrudiannur, S. (2024). Kajian Kontekstual Soal Latihan pada Buku Teks Matematika Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura untuk Jenjang SMP pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 1200–1210. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i2.2241
Winarni, S., Hanim, M., Kumalasari, A., Marlina, M., & Rohati, R. (2023). Pengembangan Buku Saku Berbasis Augmented Reality Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Spasial Siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(4), 3561. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i4.8193
Zamnah, L. N., Zaenuri, Wardono, & Sukestiyarno. (2021). Make questions as a stimulus for students to help them carry out their Polya’s step in solving problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042099
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Generic License.
