Four-tier Diagnostic Test sebagai Pendeteksi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Ikatan Kimia untuk Mendukung Pendidikan Berkelanjutan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v13iSpecial_issue.88643Keywords:
Four-tier diagnostic test, Miskonsepsi ikatan kimia, Pengembangan instrumenAbstract
Pemahaman konsep kimia sangat penting untuk mencegah miskonsepsi, terutama pada materi ikatan kimia. Namun, belum banyak instrumen yang dapat secara sistematis mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi peserta didik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen four-tier diagnostic test yang valid dan reliabel untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi pada materi ikatan kimia. Penelitian menggunakan metode Research and Development (R&D) dengan model 4D (define, design, develop, dan disseminate). Uji coba dilakukan dalam tiga tahap meliputi uji coba ahli, uji coba skala kecil di satu sekolah, dan skala besar di 3 sekolah. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa instrumen ini valid dan reliabel dengan tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda yang bervariasi. Instrumen ini efektif mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi serta hubungan antara keyakinan dan pemahaman konsep peserta didik.
References
reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959.https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Atkins, P. (2013). What is Chemistry? (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://en.id1lib.org/book/2616269/8ff094
Az-Zahra, N., Suryana, D., & Nadhirah, N. A. (2024). Analisis validitas konstruk instrumen kematangan karier menggunakan winstep. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Ar-Rahman, 10(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.31602/jbkr.v10i1.13745
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2002). Mental models in chemistry: senior chemistry students’ mental models of chemical bonding. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 3(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1039/B2RP90014A
Derkach, T. M. (2021). The origin of misconceptions in inorganic chemistry and their correction by computer modelling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012012
Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis kualitas soal kemampuan membedakan rangkaian seri dan paralel melalui teori tes klasik dan model rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19.
Fratiwi, N. J., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Suyana, I., & Samsudin, A. (2017). The transformation of two-tier into four-tier test on newton’s laws concepts. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983967
Habiddin, & Page, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of a four-tier diagnostic instrument for chemical kinetics (FTDICK). Indones. J. Chem, 19(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218
Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Andina, R. E., Munggaran, L. R., & Rahmawati, Y. (2020). Analysis of students’ alternative conceptions about electrolyte and non- electrolyte solutions using a two-tier diagnostic test for chemistry teaching improvement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1926–1934. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080529
Harahap, I. P. P., & Novita, D. (2020). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrument Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC) Pada Konsep Laju Reaksi. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 9(2), 222–227.
Härmälä-Braskén, A. S., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2020). Misconceptions in Chemistry Among Finnish Prospective Primary School Teachers–a Long-Term Study. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1447–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1765046
Jumini, S., Madnasri, S., Cahyono, E., & Parmin, P. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Pengukuran Literasi Sains Melalui Teori Tes Klasik Dan Rasch Model. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang, 758–765.
Murniningsih, Muna, K., & Irawati, R. K. (2020). Analysis of Misconceptions by Four Tier Tests in Electrochemistry, Case Study on Students of the Chemistry Education Study Program UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012008
Özmen, H. (2004). Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031255.92943.6d
Pratama, F. I., & Rohaeti, E. (2024). How Does “Chemistry Challenge” E-book Affect the Chemical Literacy Profile? A Study to Test Learning Media Effectiveness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7018
Purniasari, L., Masykuri, M., & Ariani, S. R. D. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Mata Pelajaran Kimia SMAN 1 Kutowinangun Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020 Menggunakan Model Iteman dan Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 10(2), 205–214. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jpkim
Rahayu, I. (2009). Praktis Belajar Kimia untuk Kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (F. Dzalfa (ed.)). Jakarta: Visindo Media Persada.
Rahmasari, D., & Ismiyati. (2016). Analisis Butir Soal Mata Pelajaran Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 5(1), 317–330.
Rahmiati, Irawati, R. K., & Astutik, T. P. (2022). Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Reaksi Redoks dengan Four-Tier Test. AL KAWNU: SCIENCE AND LOCAL WISDOM JOURNAL, 01(02), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.18592/alkawnu.v1i1.6343
Rohmah, F. N., Susilaningsih, E., Haryani, S., & Kasmui. (2022). Desain Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca Bermuatan High Order Thinking Skills untuk Menganalisis Kompetensi Minimum Siswa Materi Asam-Basa. Chemistry in Education, 11(2), 117–125.
Sesen, B. A. (2010). Internet as a Source of Misconception : “Radiation and Radioactivity.” TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 94–100. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ908075
Setiawan, C. E., & Ilahi, P. R. (2022). Identification of Misconceptions in Chemical Bonding Materials Using Three Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 5(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v5i1.16860
Smiley, J. (2015). Classical Test Theory or Rasch: A Personal Account from a Novice User. Shiken, 19(1), 16–29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288858190
Stefani, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Students’ Levels of Explanations, Models, and Misconceptions in Basic Quantum Chemistry: A Phenomenographic Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20279
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan.Cimahi: Trim Komunikata.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Challenging Misconceptions in the Chemistry Classroom: Resources to Support Teachers. Educació Química EduQ, 4, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2003.02.27
Tarigan, E. F., Nilmarito, S., Islamiyah, K., Darmana, A., & Suyanti, R. D. (2022). Analisis Instrumen Tes Menggunakan Rasch Model dan Software SPSS 22.0. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 16(2), 92–96.
Tümay, H. (2016a). Emergence, Learning Difficulties, and Misconceptions in Chemistry Undergraduate Students’ Conceptualizations of Acid Strength. Science and Education, 25(1–2), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9799-x
Tümay, H. (2016b). Reconsidering Learning Difficulties and Misconceptions in Chemistry: Emergence in Chemistry and its Implications For Chemical Education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00008h
Üce, M., & Ceyhan, İ. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them : Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3990
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Generic License.
