Analisis Karakteristik Butir Soal Elemen Komputer Akuntansi Fase F Menggunakan Software Anates
Analysis Of Item Characteristics Of Phase F Accounting Computer Elements Using Anates Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v23i2.91595Keywords:
Daya Pembeda, Pengecoh, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesukaran, ValiditasAbstract
Penilaian kualitas butir soal merupakan tahap krusial dalam memastikan efektivitas evaluasi pembelajaran, khususnya pada mata pelajaran elemen komputer akuntansi yang menuntut integrasi kompetensi teknis dan konseptual. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis karakteristik butir soal fase F meliputi validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan efektivitas pengecoh dengan menggunakan software Anates pada tes pilihan ganda. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan mengolah data hasil tes siswa berdasarkan teori tes klasik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa validitas butir didominasi kategori cukup, reliabilitas instrumen sangat tinggi, dan tingkat kesukaran mayoritas berada pada kategori sedang. Daya pembeda sebagian besar berada pada kategori baik dan sangat baik, sedangkan efektivitas pengecoh menunjukkan variasi kualitas, dengan sebagian butir memerlukan revisi karena berada pada kategori kurang baik hingga sangat buruk. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa instrumen memiliki kualitas yang baik secara keseluruhan, namun perlu perbaikan dalam validitas moderat dan pengecoh yang tidak berfungsi. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi penting terhadap pengembangan instrumen evaluasi akuntansi berbasis komputer yang lebih tepat, reliabel, dan diagnostik.
References
A. Stephen Editor, L. (2024). Developments in the Reporting of Score Reliability within Counseling Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 57(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2024.2333692
Agnola, E. B. Y., Aurelia, T. R., Hakim, L., & Pratiwi, V. (2025). Analisis Evaluasi Soal Komputer Akuntansi Menggunakan Software Anates oleh Siswa SMK Ketintang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 2262–2270.
Ahmad, f., Kartika Dwi, A., Andini Kasih Agus, S., Luqman, H., & Vivi, P. (2024). Analisis Butir Soal HOTS Pilihan Ganda Pada Elemen Komputer Akuntansi Di SMKN 10 Surabaya Menggunakan Aplikasi Anates. PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(1), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v4i1.6792
Alemu, A., Tesfa, H., Mulugeta, A., Fenta, E., & Belay, M. (2024). Quality of multiple choice question items: item analysis. International Journal of Scientific Reports, 10, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20241316
Ansari, M., Sadaf, R., Akbar, A., Rehman, S., Chaudhry, Z., & Shakir, S. (2022). Assessment of distractor efficiency of MCQS in item analysis. The Professional Medical Journal, 29, 730–734. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2022.29.05.6955
Arikunto. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Awalurahman, H., & Budi, I. (2024). Automatic distractor generation in multiple-choice questions: a systematic literature review. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e2441. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2441
Fiska, J., Hidayati, Y., Qomaria, N., & Puspita Hadi, W. (2021). ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL ULANGAN HARIAN IPA MENGGUNAKAN SOFTWARE ANATES PADA PENDEKATAN TEORI TES KLASIK. Natural Science Education Research, 4, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i1.8133
Hermaya, I., Helendra, Vauzia, & Arsih, F. (2024). Item Quality Analysis of Concept Understanding and Problem Solving in Environmental Change Materials Using ANATES. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 7, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v7i2.84083
Jahrami, H., Husain, W., Lin, C.-Y., Björling, G., Potenza, M. N., & Pakpour, A. (2024). Reliability generalization Meta-Analysis and psychometric review of the Gaming Disorder test (GDT): Evaluating internal consistency. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 20, 100563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100563
Kim, Y. H., Kim, B. H., Kim, J., Jung, B., & Bae, S. (2024). Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2023, Korea: a psychometric study. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 21, 40. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.40
Kreitchmann, R. S., Nájera, P., Sanz, S., & Sorrel, M. (2024). Enhancing Content Validity Assessment With Item Response Theory Modeling. Psicothema, 36, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.208
Kumar, D., Jaipurkar, R., Shekhar, A., Sikri, G., & Srinivas, V. (2021). Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 77, S85–S89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007
Lee, Y., Kim, S., & Jo, Y. (2025). Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction.
Levacher, J., Koch, M., Stegt, S., Hissbach, J., Spinath, F., Escher, M., & Becker, N. (2023). The construct validity of the main student selection tests for medical studies in Germany. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1120129
Mardiyyaningsih, A., Erlina, E., Ulfah, M., & Wafiq, A. (2023). Validity and Reliability of the Two-tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Students’ Alternative Conceptions of Intermolecular Forces. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9, 4375–4381. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2797
Marianti, S. R., Ana; Hasanah, Nur; and Nuryanti, Sofia. (2023). Comparing item-total correlation and item-theta correlation in test item selection: A simulation and empirical study. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Vol. 27: Iss. 2, Article 1. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.21831/pep.v27i2.61477
Mawardi, M., Fuady, A., & Sunismi, S. (2023). Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Menggunakan Anates pada Penilaian Tengah Semester Kelas VII D SMP Negeri 1 Ngajum Kabupaten Malang. Wahana, 75, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.36456/wahana.v75i1.6820
Mulyani, H., Tanuatmodjo, H., & Iskandar, R. (2020). Quality analysis of teacher-made tests in financial accounting subject at vocational high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i1.29382
Nurjanah, S., Iqbal, M., Zafrullah, Z., Mahmud, M., Seran, D. a., Suardi, I., & Arriza, L. (2024). Psychometric quality of multiple-choice tests under Classical Test Theory (CTT): AnBuso, Iteman, and RStudio. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 28. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v28i2.71542
Putri, R., Parwita, W., Handika, S., Sudipa, I. G. I., & Santika, P. (2024). Evaluation of Accounting Information System Using Usability Testing Method and System Usability Scale. Sinkron, 9, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13129
Qurochman, A., Febriana, A., Santoso, H., & Haryana, R. (2024). Peningkatan Kompetensi Siswa SMK Melalui Pelatihan Aplikasi Komputer Accurate Accounting. Jurnal Abmas Negeri (JAGRI), 5, 494–503. https://doi.org/10.36590/jagri.v5i2.1311
Rameshbhai, C., Chauhan, B., Vaza, J., & Chauhan, P. (2023). Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions. Cureus, 15. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42492
Rezigalla, A., Eleragi, A., Elhussein, A., Alfaifi, J., Alghamdi, M., Al-Ameer, A., Yahia, A., Mohamed, O., & Isa, A. (2024). Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05433-y
Sabela, O., Krisdayanty, D., Taqqiyah, A., Hakim, L., & Pratiwi, V. (2025). Analisis Butir Soal HOTS Elemen Dokumen Berbasis Digital (FASE E) Menggunakan Program Anates. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v6i1.2328
Sheptian, R., Sarifah, I., & Riyadi, R. (2025). CLASSICAL TEST THEORY ANALYSIS USING ANATES: A STUDY OF MATHEMATICS READINESS TEST FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.3863
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutrisno, P., Debora, D., Destriana, N., Putri, A., Marlinah, A., Wijaya, N., & Lekok, W. (2023). Pendampingan Pelatihan Software Akuntansi Accurate dalam Membantu Guru & Siswa-Siswi Smk untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi dan Profesionalisme. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Ekonomi, 2, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.35912/jpe.v2i1.716
Toma, R. B., Ortiz-Revilla, J., & Greca, I. (2024). Development and validation of a multiple-choice test for sustainability competence in primary school using the GreenComp framework. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100388
Wilsa, A. W., Rusilowati, A., Susilaningsih, E., Jaja, J., & Nurpadillah, V. (2023). Validity, reliability, and item characteristics of cell material science literacy assessment instruments. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.61577
Yusuf, F. W. (2024). Analisis Butir Soal Asesmen Sumatif Biologi Materi Perubahan Lingkungan dengan Menggunakan Anates Pada Kelas X SMA. LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v4i1.2777
Zhang, S., & Colvin, K. (2024). Comparison of different reliability estimation methods for single-item assessment: a simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriel Wahyu Satriyo Pidekso, Galang Pandu Satriya Ramadhan, Mochammad Ramadhan Adam Sampurno Sampurno, Muhammad Nur Hafizh Hafizh, Vivi Pratiwi, Luqman Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
