Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Kependidikan accommodates the ideas, thoughts, innovations, and inventions' dissemination in education for national and international researchers and practitioners

Jurnal Kependidikan accepts and publishes the educational research results focusing on learning innovations and its implication for the formal education, informal and nonformal education to all of educational levels. The journal involves the scopes of these research disciplines;

  • Educational sciences in general
  • Mathematics and science education
  • Social science education
  • Linguistics education
  • Sport science education
  • Technical and Vocational education
  • Economic and business education

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Must disclose any competing interest before agreeing to review a submission.
  2. Can refuse to review any submission due to a conflict of interest or inadequate knowledge.
  3. Review all submissions objectively, fairly and professionally.
  4. Reveal any ethical misconduct encountered while reviewing to the Chief Editor for further action.
  5. Should ensure the originality of a submission and be alert to any plagiarism and redundant publication.
  6. Must not discuss the content of the submission without permission.
  7. Adhere to the time allocated for the review process. Requests for extension to review the submission is at the discretion of the Chief Editor.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION

Jurnal Kependidikan can be purchase by:

TRANSFER

  1. Please fill in the Subscription Form (if you have problems with it you may contact us via email) See Price list HERE
  2. Please send us the payment receipt, the subscription form and the contact number (transfer receipt to the account number attached in the form) enclosed
    jk@uny.ac.id
    The journal will be sent immediately after the subscription form and payment receipt have been sent.

CASH

Those who want to have cash payment may visit Journal Manager room on the first floor of the Institute  of Research and Community Service, Yogyakarta State University (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta), Yogyakarta 55281 Phone (0274) 550840

JOURNAL AVAILABILITY

  1. 2011 : No 1 May & No 2 November
  2. 2012 : No 1 May & No 2 November
  3. 2012 : No 1 May & No 2 November
  4. 2013 : No 1 May & No 2 November
  5. 2014 : No 1 May & No 2 November
  6. 2015 : No 1 May & No 2 November
  7. 2016 : No 1 May & No 2 November
Price: @ 75.000 IDR

 

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Here are the publication ethics:

  1. The manuscript presents complete and original information as well as objective data.
  2. Quotation source and reference cited in the manuscript must be informed.
  3. The manuscript is written concisely and clearly for efficiency.
  4. The manuscript is, at the same time, not being sent to and has never been published by another journal.
  5. Everyone involved in the research (students & supervisors) should be included in the team of writers.
  6. A writer who passed away should be included as a co-author.
  7. Authors must avoid fabrication (make up the data and results of a study).
  8. Authors must avoid falsification (manipulating research materials, equipment, process, changing the data or intentionally discarding data or results).
  9. Authors should avoid Plagiarism (taking ideas, processes, results or words without citing the sources).
  10. Authors should avoid Fragmentation (breaking research data into different themes of manuscript so that the discussion cannot become in-depth)
  11. The manuscript should not use copied materials from another article without permission.
  12. All materials/quotation earned from previous research, involving similar writers related to previous publications must be cited properly.

 

 

 

CALL FOR PAPERS

Jurnal Kependidikan (JK) invites you to submit original manuscripts in the topics related to educational research that contributes to the understanding, development theory, the scientific concept and its application to education in Indonesia

LinkAuthor Guideline

Link: Template

Click here for submitting the manuscript as

(OJS User) or (New User)


 

PEER REVIEW

All submissions received will be selected by the editorial board. Selected manuscripts will be sent to a reviewer. Peer review carried out by blind review to ensure objectivity in assessing the feasibility of the manuscript. Reviewer decides in four categories, which are accept submission, revisions required, resubmit for review, and decline submission. The selected manuscript will be edited and published.

All published manuscripts in Jurnal Kependidikan are not charged. The main author will receive 1 copy of the journal.

 

AUTHOR FEES

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are not required to pay an Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.

Article Publication: IDR 1,500,000 or USD 100
If this paper is accepted for online publication, you are required to pay Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs. You will receive 1 copy of the journal.

 

HISTORY

THE HISTORY OF JURNAL KEPENDIDIKAN

Jurnal Kependidikan had been initially published since 1975 and obtained STT in 1980, number 755 / P / SK / DITJEN PPG / STT / 1980, dated July 6, 1980 in the name of JURNAL KEPENDIDIKAN IKIP YOGYAKARTA. At first, the contents of this journal consist of ideas, research results, and the description of a research. From 1982, the journal gives priority to the research result based article; the name was changed into JURNAL KEPENDIDIKAN (JK). The name was chosen to reflect the content that prioritizes the results of educational research.

In 1985, articles from the universities were sent to the journal so that the focus of educational research shares with non-educational fields, especially teaching materials which were taught in schools. Furthermore, because the school education materials also become IKIP scope, the development of the journal focus and scope are inevitable.

To enrich the reader insight on a variety of research approaches and problems, since 1991 JK for each edition inserted a special article focus on approach and research methodology. Similarly, to improve the quality of publications since 1980, the guidelines of JK had been changed for three times.

In the Editorial Board meeting in 1995, it was decided that JK is no longer a journal consisting non-educational research articles. It was taken to avoid the publication of journals that were potpourri. In 1996, the articles of non-educational research results eventually separated into JURNAL PENELITIAN IPTEKS DAN HUMANIORA (Now JURNAL PENELITIAN SAINTEK and JURNAL PENELITIAN HUMANIORA) published by Lembaga Penelitian IKIP YOGYAKARTA (now known as the Institute for Research and Community Service).

In addition, since 1977 JK also appointed reviewers from other universities. This was done in order to improve the quality of the content of publications.

Here are the Editorial team of JK when it was first established: Suyanto, M.Ed., Ph.D .; Dr. Pujiati Suyata, M. Pd .; Dra. Suryati Sidharto, M.A .; Prof. Dr. Djohar, M: S .; Sukamto, M.Sc., Ph.D; Suryanto, M.A., Ph.D .; Sarbiran, M.Ed., Ph.D., Prof. D. Sardjono.

Jurnal Kependidikan has been accredited by DIKTI No. 12/M/Kp/II/2015, on Februari 11, 2015. 

 

Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran is a continuation of Jurnal IKIP Yogyakarta and Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Pendidikan, published since 1980 with Number ISSN: 0125-992X. This journal has been accredited by DIKTI in 2001 and 2015 with Decree No. 118 / DIKTI / Kep / 2001 on May 9, 2001 and Number 12 / M / Kp / II / 2015 on February 11, 2015. Jurnal Kependidikan published by Institute of Researach and Community Service, Yogyakarta State University in collaboration with the Indonesian Education Research Society (MPPI) since 2012.

 

PROCEDURE

PROCEDURE (AUTHOR)

To find out the steps to log in, submit articles and checking the status of the article click HERE

PROCEDURE (REVIEWER)

To find out the steps to log in and review the article, clik HERE

 

 

PLAGIARISM POLICY

Statement and policy

Jurnal Kependidikan (JK) apply Zero tolerance towards plagiarism and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in JK.

Definition: Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Policy: Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

All submitted papers will be checked of their similarity with Turnitin

When plagiarism is identified, the Principal Editor responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following provision:

Similarity level

Automotive Experiences practices Zero tolerance towards plagiarism. We use iThenticate to evaluate the similarity index and then the editor decides the case of possible plagiarism (Similarity report will be provided to the author). Editorial board has passed the following actions:

  1. Similarity Index above 40%: Article Rejected (due to poor citation and/or poor paraphrasing, article outright rejected, NO RESUBMISSION accepted).
  2. Similarity Index (20-40%): Send to the author for improvement (provide correct citations to all places of similarity and do good paraphrasing even if the citation is provided).
  3. Similarity index less than 20%:  Accepted or citation improvement may be required (proper citations must be provided to all outsourced texts).

In cases 2 and 3: The authors should revise the article carefully, add required citations, and do good paraphrasing to outsourced text. And resubmit the article with a new iThenticate report showing NO PLAGIARISM and similarity less than 20%.

Additional information

It is understood that the authors are responsible for the contents of the papers they send because they confirm the paper's originality statement before submission and have read this plagiarism policy. If the second case of severe plagiarism by the same author(s) is identified, a decision on the measures to be enforced will be made by the Editorial board. The author(s) might be forbidden to submit further articles forever.

This policy applies also to material reproduced from another publication by the same author(s). If an author uses text or figures that have previously been published, the corresponding paragraphs or figures should be identified and the previous publication referenced. It is understood that in case of a review paper or a paper of a tutorial nature much of the material was previously published.

The author should identify the source of the previously published material and obtain permission from the original author and the publisher. If an author submits a manuscript to Automotive Experiences with significant overlap with a manuscript submitted to another journal simultaneously, and this overlap is discovered during the review process or after the publications of both papers, the editor of the other journal is notified and the case is treated as a severe plagiarism case. Significant overlap means the use of identical or almost identical figures and identical or slightly modified text for one half or more of the paper. For self-plagiarism of less than one half of the paper but more than one-tenth of the paper, the case shall be treated as intermediate plagiarism. If self-plagiarism is confined to the methods section, the case shall be considered as minor plagiarism.

If an author uses some of his previously published material to clarify the presentation of new results, the previously published material shall be identified and the difference to the present publication shall be mentioned. Permission to republish must be obtained from the copyright holder. In the case of a manuscript that was originally published in conference proceedings and then is submitted for publication in Jurnal Kependidikan (JK) either in identical or in expanded form, the authors must identify the name of the conference proceedings and the date of the publication and obtain permission to republish from the copyright holder. The editor may decide not to accept this paper for publication. However, an author shall be permitted to use material from an unpublished presentation, including visual displays, in a subsequent journal publication. In the case of a publication being submitted, that was originally published in another language, the title, date, and journal of the original publication must be identified by the authors, and the copyright must be obtained.

 

R-W-C Policy

R-W-C Policy

Policy Statement

We understand that the authors have worked carefully in preparing manuscripts, and we have carried out peer-review processes. However, sometimes there is the potential for published articles to be withdrawn or even deleted for scientific reasons. It should not be done lightly and can only occur under extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed will be carried out with strict standards to maintain confidence in the authority of its electronic archives. It is our commitment and policy to maintain the integrity and completeness of important scientific records for researchers and librarians archives.

Content Integrity and Maintenance

Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by JK to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur. CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. JK recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the current status of a document and may also provide additional publication record information about the document.

Article Retraction

JK is committed to playing its part in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record, therefore on occasion, it is necessary to retract articles. Articles may be retracted if:

  • There is major scientific error that would invalidate the conclusions of the article, for example where there is clear evidence that findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).
  • The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication).
  • There are ethical issues such as plagiarism (appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit including those obtained through confidential review of others' manuscripts) or inappropriate authorship.

In order to ensure that retractions are handled according to publication best practice, and in accordance with COPE retraction guidelines, JK adopts the following retraction process:

  • An article requiring potential retraction is brought to the attention of the journal editor.
  • The journal editor should follow the step-by-step guidelines according to the COPE flowcharts (including evaluating a response from the author of the article in question).
  • Before any action is taken, the editor's findings should be sent to the Ethics Advisory Board. The purpose of this step is to ensure a consistent approach in accordance with industry best practices.
  • The final decision as to whether to retract is then communicated to the author and, if necessary, any other relevant bodies, such as the author's institution on occasion.
  • The retraction statement is then posted online and published in the next available issue of the journal (see below for more details of this step). 

Note that if authors retain copyright for an article this does not mean they automatically have the right to retract it after publication. The integrity of the published scientific record is of paramount importance and COPE’s Retraction Guidelines still apply in such cases.

Article Withdrawal

The author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, and works invested by the publisher. For attention, before the author submits the manuscript through our OJS, the author is obliged to approve the checklist that we provide.

  • If the author requests the withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the author will be punished by paying $200 USD per manuscript.
  • If the withdrawal of the manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication; the author will be punished by paying $250 USD per manuscript.
  • If an article has been published as "Article in Press" (articles that have been accepted for publication but which has not been formally published and will not have the complete volume/issue/page information) that include errors, or are discovered to be accidental duplicates of other published article (s), or are determined to violate our journal publishing ethics guidelines in the view of the editors (such as multiple submissions, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like), maybe "Withdrawn "From the JK website. Withdrawing means that the article content (HTML and PDF) is deleted and replaced with an HTML page and PDF simply states that the article has been withdrawn. In this case, the author will be punished by paying $300 USD per manuscript.
  • If the author doesn't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal (3 years).
  • If the author request to withdraw a manuscript, an official letter signed by the corresponding author and agency leader must be sent to the Principal Editor.

Article Correction

JK should consider issuing a correction if:

  • A small part of an otherwise reliable publication reports flawed data or proves to be misleading, especially if this is the result of honest error.
  • The Author or Contributor list is incorrect (e.g. a deserving Author has been omitted or someone who does not meet authorship criteria has been included).

Corrections to peer-reviewed content fall into one of three categories:

  • Publisher correction (erratum): to notify readers of an important error made by publishing/journal staff (usually a production error) that has a negative impact on the publication record or the scientific integrity of the article, or on the reputation of the Authors or the journal.
  • Author correction (corrigendum): to notify readers of an important error made by the Authors which has a negative impact on the publication record or the scientific integrity of the article, or on the reputation of the Authors or the journal.
  • Addendum: an addition to the article by its Authors to explain inconsistencies, to expand the existing work, or otherwise explain or update the information in the main work.

The decision whether a correction should be issued is made by the Editor(s) of a journal, sometimes with advice from Reviewers or Editorial Board members. Handling Editors will contact the Authors of the paper concerned with a request for clarification, but the final decision about whether a correction is required and if so which type rests with the Editors.

Article Removal

In an extremely limited number of cases, it may be necessary to remove a published article from our online platform. This will only happen if an article is clearly defamatory, or infringes others’ legal rights, or where the article is, or we have good reason to expect that it will be, the subject of a court order, or where the article, if acted upon, may pose a serious health risk. In such circumstances, while the metadata (i.e. title and author information) of the article will be retained, the text will be replaced with a screen indicating that the article has been removed for legal reasons.

Article Replacement

In cases where an article, if acted upon, may pose a serious health risk, the Authors of the original paper may wish to retract the flawed original and replace it with a corrected version. Under such circumstances, the above procedures for retraction will be followed with the difference that the article retraction notice will contain a link to the corrected re-published article together with a history of the document.