Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Through Recitation Method in Social Studies Classroom

Authors

  • Widiyanti Widiyanti SMP Negeri Satu Atap Karau Kuala, Barito Selatan, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia
  • Aman Aman Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-446X
  • Primanisa Azizah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Rusyda Nasyita Rahman Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jipsindo.v13i1.92117

Keywords:

social studies classroom, critical thinking skills , recitation model

Abstract

Developing students' critical thinking has become an important objective of social studies education, yet classroom instruction often provides limited opportunities for students to engage in inquiry, collaborative reasoning, and evidence-based argumentation. This study explored how structured recitation activities fostered students' critical thinking during social studies learning through a qualitative classroom inquiry. The study involved eight junior high school students and employed classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, students' learning artifacts, and classroom documentation as primary data sources. Data were analyzed using the interactive analysis model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, involving data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing.

The findings revealed four interconnected themes characterizing the development of students' critical thinking: (1) developing collaborative learning engagement, (2) building learning confidence through peer support, (3) developing evidence-based critical thinking, and (4) strengthening independent inquiry through structured recitation activities. Students gradually shifted from passive participation toward active engagement by collaboratively seeking information, discussing ideas, constructing arguments, and defending their conclusions using evidence. These qualitative findings were supported by improvements in students' critical thinking achievement throughout the learning process.

The study concludes that structured recitation activities provide meaningful learning experiences that extend beyond improving academic achievement by promoting collaboration, learner autonomy, analytical reasoning, and reflective participation. The findings offer practical implications for social studies teachers seeking to design more student-centered learning environments that effectively foster critical thinking.

References

Aidid, Erawan. (2020), Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Melalui Metode Resitasi. Madiun: CV. Bayfa Cendikia Indonesia.

Arikunto, S. (2019). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.

Alwy, Susiati. (2011), Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Kediri: IAIT Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Dyoty, (2023). Filsafat dan Konsep Dasar Pendidikan Modern. Yogyakarta. Media Edukasi Nusantara.

Dimyati & Mudjiono, (2013), Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, S.B. & Zain, A. (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Erwandid, M.P. (2018). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Melalui Metode Resitasi. Jakarta. Mitra Wacana Media.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature Of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. University Of Illinois.

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (5th ed.). New York. Psychology Press.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.F3

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S. A., & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A story of situated cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21187

Kemmis, S. Mc Taggart. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Victoria. Deakin University.

Kunandarm (2011). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo persada.

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Milles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. California. Saga Publications.

Sadirman, A. M. (2018). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sagala, Syaiful. (2013). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Sapriya, (2009). Pendidikan IPS Konsep dan Pembelajaran. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sihotang, K. (2019). Berpikir Kritis: kecakapan Hidup di Era Digital. Bandung. Alfabeta

Suciono, W. (2021). Berpikir kritis: Tinjauan Melalui Kemandirian Belajar, Kemampuan Akademik, dan Efikasi Diri. Yogyakarta. Deepublish

Sugiono, (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta

Suharsimi, Arikunto, dkk. (2008). Penelitian tindakan Kelas. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.

Suryo Subroto, B. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Sutama, A. S. (2023). Panduan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Berbasis Reflektif. Surakarta. UNS Press.

Syaiful Bahri, Djamarah&Aswan zain, (2019). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Wulan, Iriana, Peningkatan Daya Berpikir Kritis Pada Mata pelajaran IPS Berbentuk Media Pop art Pada Siswa kelas V SDN Klimput Kabupaten Madiun tahun pelajaran 2016/2017, Jurnal studi social 1 (2) Desember 2016.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Widiyanti, W., Aman, A., Azizah, P., & Rahman, R. (2026). Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Through Recitation Method in Social Studies Classroom . JIPSINDO, 13(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipsindo.v13i1.92117

Citation Check