Development an honesty and discipline assessment instrument in the integrated thematic learning at elementary school

Ari Setiawan, Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
Syarief Fajaruddin, (Scopus ID: 57203946070) Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Dinar Westri Andini, Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia

 10.21831/jpe.v7i1.23117

Abstract


Honest and discipline as learning outcomes need to be assessed. Many teachers have difficulty developing honesty and discipline assessments. The lack of honest and discipline assessment instruments require special attention in development. The purposes of this developmental research were to find out: (1) honest and discipline instrument indicators; (2) content validity of the instrument; (3) construct validity of the instrument; (4) instrument reliability and (5) instrument application for assessment. The research method used the development of affective instruments. The research subjects were 140 students of grade IV and V on the elementary school. The instrument used a peer-assessment model with a summative rating scale. Data analysis technique used content validity with Aiken index; construct validity with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA); reliability with Cronbach; and application of instrument with descriptive quantitative. The results of the study were indicators of honest assessment instruments and discipline of the peer-assessment model, consisted of 4, honest: convey the true information and do the examination independently. Discipline: come to school on time and obey the rules of the school. The content validity of the developed assessment instruments based on the theory had fulfilled and included in the high category. The construct validity for the developed instrument had fulfilled; means, all items were valid. Reliability of the developed instrument had met the requirements; means, the instruments were reliable. The developed instruments can be used for assessment and proved by the use of instruments for honest and disciplined assessment of elementary school students.


Keywords


instrument development; honest and disciplined; elementary school; pengembangan instrumen; jujur dan disiplin; sekolah dasar

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Ain, N., & Rahutami, R. (2018). Theme network in thematic learning in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012065

Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Clarke, S. (2005). Formative assessment in action : weaving the elements together. London: Hodder Murray.

Coaley, K. (2010). An introduction to psychological assessment & psychometrics. London: Sage Publications.

Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2008). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935

Ekowarni, E. (2009). Pedoman pendidikan akhlak mulia siswa sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Ellington, H., Earl, S., & Cowan, J. (1997). Making effective use of peer and self assessment. Aberdeen: The Robert Gordon University.

Handayani, I. R. (2018). Peran lingkungan sosial terhadap perilaku dan kedisiplinan anak usia sekolah dasar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Handayani, M. (2018). Developing thematic-integrative learning module with problem-based learning model for elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 6(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.21831/JPE.V6I2.14288

Karami, A., & Rezaei, A. (2015). An overview of peer-assessment: The benefits and importance. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 3(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v3i1.7889

Karli, H. (2016). Pembelajaran tematik untuk meningkatkan jiwa kewirausahaan siswa kelas 1-3 SD. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v3i2.2804

Koellhoffer, T. T. (2009). Character education being fair and honest. New York, N.Y.: Infobase Publishing.

Kumaidi, K. (2014). Validitas dan pemvalidasian instrumen penilaian karakter. In Seminar Psikometri Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Lickona, T. (2004). Educating for character : how our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Nuw York: Bantam.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications. Springer.

Meinbach, A. M., Rothlein, L., & Fredericks, A. D. (2000). The complete guide to thematic units: Creating the integrated curriculum. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.

Millah, D., & Syah, M. N. S. (2017). The implementation of integrative thematic learning in class I of State Elementary School 2 Barongan Kudus. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 5(2), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.21043/ELEMENTARY.V5I2.2989

Mujimin, M. (2006). Implementasi pembelajaran tematik bagi anak berkelainan. JKP (Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus), 2(2). Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpk/article/view/983

Nucci, L. P., & Narváez, D. (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. Routledge.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (McGraw-Hill series in psychology). New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.

Raka, G., Mulyana, Y., Markam, S. S., Semiawan, C. R., Hasan, S. H., Bastaman, H. D., & Nurachman, N. (2011). Pendidikan karakter di sekolah: Dari gagasan ke tindakan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029

Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., Wrightsman, L. S., & Andrews, F. M. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Academic Press.

Salamah, U. (2017). Model pembelajaran tematik pendidikan agama Islam di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2014.111-08

Setiawan, A., & Suardiman, S. P. (2018). Assessment of the social attitude of primary school students. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i1.19284

Soero, P. M. H. P., Sulistyo, D., & Hayat, A. (2014). Pemberdayaan istri nelayan melalui koperasi unit desa (KUD) (Studi pada KUD Mina Jaya Sendang Biru Kecamatan Sumbermanjing Wetan Kabupaten Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 41–46. Retrieved from http://administrasipublik.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/337

Sriyati, S., Permana, A., Arini, A., & Purnamasari, M. (2016). Efektivitas peer assessment dalam menilai kemampuan kinerja siswa pada kegiatan praktikum biologi. Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 13(1), 372–376. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5752

Stiggins, R. J. (2005). High quality classroom assessment: What does it really mean? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(2), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1992.tb00241.x

Sunyoto, D. (2012). Validitas dan reabilitas dilengkapi analisis data dalam penelitian kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Utari, U., Degeng, I. N. S., & Akbar, S. (2016). Pembelajaran tematik berbasis kearifan lokal di sekolah dasar dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA). Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 1(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.17977/JTP2IPS.V1I1.5861

Viswanathan, M. (2005). Measurement error and research design. Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/asi/measurement-error-and-research-design/book226938

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698

Widyaningrum, R. (2012). Model pembelajaran tematik di MI/SD. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 107–120.

Wijayanti, E., & Mundilarto, M. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen diri dan teman sejawat kompetensi bidang studi pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5572




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v7i1.23117

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Prima Edukasia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Prima Edukasia indexed by:

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 2338-4743 |e-ISSN: 2460-9927

Creative Commons LicenseJurnal Prima Edukasia by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Prima Edukasia Journal Stats