Analisis situasi didaktis dalam pembelajaran matematika berbantuan ICT pada siswa SMP

Ardhi Prabowo; Dadang Juandi

doi:10.21831/pg.v15i1.32573

Analisis situasi didaktis dalam pembelajaran matematika berbantuan ICT pada siswa SMP

Ardhi Prabowo, Jurusan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Dadang Juandi, Departemen Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v15i1.32573

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi apakah mahasiswa calon guru matematika mampu membangun situasi didaktis matematis pada siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran matematika berbasis ICT (Information and Communications Technology). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa calon guru yang telah praktik mengajar di sekolah. Subjek menggunakan aplikasi yang dibuat sendiri oleh subjek. Aplikasi yang dibuat berupa Augmented Reality (realitas bertumbuh), yaitu teknologi yang menggabungkan benda maya dua dimensi dan atau pun tiga dimensi ke dalam sebuah lingkungan nyata tiga dimensi lalu memproyeksikan benda-benda maya tersebut dalam waktu nyata. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan karakteristik situasi didaktis dalam pembelajaran matematika berbantuan ICT pada siswa SMP yang dibangun oleh mahasiswa calon guru adalah sebagai berikut: situasi didaktis matematis yang dibangun belum mengonstruksi pengetahuan siswa secara mandiri; situasi didaktis matematis yang dibangun cenderung berasal dari informasi yang disampaikan guru, bukan dari media ICT yang digunakan; dan ICT yang dilibatkan dalam pembelajaran belum mampu mengelaborasikan proses kognitif siswa dalam jejak pembelajarannya.

Analysis of a didactic situation in ICT-assisted mathematics learning in junior high school students

Abstract

This study aims to identify whether prospective mathematics teacher students are able to build mathematical didactic situations in junior high school students in ICT-based mathematics learning. This research is descriptive qualitative research. The research subjects were prospective teachers who had practiced teaching at school. The subjects used applications made by themselves. Those applications were in the form of augmented reality (reality grows), namely technology that combines two-dimensional and or three-dimensional virtual objects into a real three-dimensional environment and then projecting these virtual objects in real-time. The results showed the characteristics of didactic situations in ICT-assisted mathematics learning in junior high school students built by prospective teacher students were as follows: didactic mathematical situations that were built had not constructed students' knowledge independently; the built mathematical didactic situation tends to originate from the information conveyed by the teacher, not from the ICT media used; and ICT involved in learning has not been able to elaborate the cognitive processes of students in their learning footprint.

Keywords

Situasi didaktis; pembelajaran matematika SMP; calon guru matematika; didactic situation; prospective mathematics teacher; information and communications technology (ICT)

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of Learning Group. https://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf

As’ari, A. R., Tohir, M., Valentino, E., Imron, Z., & Taufiq, I. (2017a). Buku guru matematika SMP/MTs kelas VIII edisi revisi (A. Lukito, A. Mahmudi, & D. Hidayat, Eds.). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

As’ari, A. R., Tohir, M., Valentino, E., Imron, Z., & Taufiq, I. (2017b). Matematika SMP kelas VIII semester 1 edisi revisi. (A. Lukito, A. Mahmudi, Turmudi, Y. Marpaung, Y. Satria, Widowati, & D. Hidayat, Eds.). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Assis, C., Gitirana, V., & Trouche, L. (2018). The metamorphosis of resource systems of prospective teacher: From studying to teaching. In V. Gitirana, T. Miyakawa, M. Rafalska, S. Soury-Lavergne, & L. Trouche (Eds.), Proceedings/Actes Re(S)Source 2018 International Conference (pp. 39–42). Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon).

Bartell, T. G., Webel, C., Bowen, B., & Dyson, N. (2013). Prospective teacher learning: Recognizing evidence of conceptual understanding. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9205-4

Brousseau, G. (2002). Epistemological obstacles, problems, and didactical engineering. In N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield (Eds.), Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (Didactique des mathématiques), 1970–1990 (pp. 79–117). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2_6

Bruner, J. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32. https://digitalauthorshipuri.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/the-act-of-discovery-bruner.pdf

Cahyono, E., Isnarto, I., Ridlo, S., Handoyo, E., Yulianto, A., & Sugianto. (2018). Kurikulum UNNES 2018 program studi sarjana pendidikan (Rustono & E. Subkhan, Eds.). UNNES Press.

Chaves, C. (2008). Adult learners and the dialectical process: A validating constructivist approach to learning tranfer and application. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 3(1), 1–14. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ojwed/vol3/iss1/2/

Dahlan, J. A. (2014). Kurikulum dan pengembangannya. In Analisis Kurikulum (pp. 1.1-1.34). Universitas Terbuka.

Dawson, K. (2006). Teacher inquiry: A vehicle to merge prospective teachers’ experience and reflection during curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782460

Dubinsky, E. (2000). Using a theory of learning in college mathematics courses. TaLUM, the Teaching and Learning Undergraduate Mathematics, 10–16. http://www.math.wisc.edu/~wilson/Courses/Math903/UsingAPOS.pdf

Ernest, P. (Ed.). (1994). Constructing mathematical knowledge: Epistemology and mathematics education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203454206

Evayanti, M. (2017). Desain didaktis konsep garis dan sudut berdasarkan realistic mathematics education (RME) pada pembelajaran matematika sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. http://repository.upi.edu/33717/

Fadholi, T., Waluya, B., & Mulyono. (2015). Analisis Pembelajaran matematika dan kemampuan literasi serta karakter siswa SMK. Unnes Journal of Research Mathematics Education, 4(1), 42–48. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/6906

Fahmi, S., & Marsigit, M. (2014). Pengembangan multimedia macromedia flash dengan pendekatan kontekstual dan keefektifannya terhadap sikap siswa pada matematika. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9071

Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. https://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2011/06/selfdirected1.pdf

Fried, M. N. (2006). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples (Book Review). ZDM (Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik), 38(2), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655890

Harel, G. (2011). What is mathematics? A pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. In B. Gold & R. Simons (Eds.), Proof and other Dilemmas (pp. 265–290). Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.5948/upo9781614445050.018

Husni, M. A. (2014). Keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi dan curiosity. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9058

Kartika, H. (2014). Pembelajaran matematika berbantuan software matlab sebagai upaya meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan minat belajar siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan UNSIKA, 2(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.10.2.3637.93-108

Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery, on understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Combined ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Prabowo, A., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Lembar kerja yang bermakna. In U. Sukandi (Ed.), Modul pelatihan good practice school (pp. 93–104). USAID PRIORITAS.

Putra, F. G. (2015). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe teams games tournament (TGT) berbantuan software cabri 3D ditinjau dari kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.43

Risnanosanti, R. (2009). Membangun suatu situasi-didaktis dalam pembelajaran inkuiri untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA. (pp. M.501-M.506). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/12301/1/M_Pend_27_ Risnanosanti.pdf

Romdhani, W., & Suryadi, D. (2017). Desain didaktis konsep pecahan untuk kelas III sekolah dasar. EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 8(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v8i2.5142

Saputro, K. Z. (2018). Memahami ciri dan tugas perkembangan masa remaja. Aplikasia: Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu-Ilmu Agama, 17(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.14421/aplikasia.v17i1.1362

Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248099

Sulistiawati, S., Suryadi, D., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Desain didaktis penalaran matematis untuk mengatasi kesulitan belajar siswa SMP pada luas dan volume limas. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i2.4833

Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR) (E. Gapura, Ed.). Gapura Press.

Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory-based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12442801

Thorndike, E. L. (1914). Educational psychology, Vol 3: Mental work and fatigue and individual differences and their causes. Teachers College. https://doi.org/10.1037/13796-000

UNNES. (2019). Kurikulum UNNES program studi pendidikan matematika jenjang S1.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wahono, T. K., & Budiarto, M. T. (2014). Kecerdasan visual-spasial siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal geometri ruang ditinjau dari perbedaan kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 158–164. http://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/7322

Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613714

Yunarti, T. (2014). Desain Didaktis Teori Peluang SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Lampung, 15(1), 15–20, http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/5479/3415

Zulkarnaen, R. (2017). Penerapan pendekatan realistik berbantuan ICT terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa kelas VII. Euclid, 3(2), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v3i2.334

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i1.32573