Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient

Linda Nur Chabibah; Emy Siswanah; Dyan Falasifa Tsani

doi:10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024

Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient

Linda Nur Chabibah, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Emy Siswanah, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Dyan Falasifa Tsani, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian kualitatif ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi barisan ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah memiliki 4 indikator yaitu: 1) mengidentifikasi masalah, 2) merumuskan masalah, 3) melaksanakan strategi, dan 4) memverifikasi solusi. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada semester genap tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 30 Siswa kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Kesatrian 1 Semarang yang telah diajarkan materi barisan. Kemudian dipilih subjek berdasarkan tipe AQ yaitu Climber, Camper dan Quitter. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan angket AQ, tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data penelitian ini meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan/verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa bertipe Climber mampu memenuhi seluruh indikator dari 4 indikator kemampuan pemecahan masalah yaitu indikator 1, 2, 3, dan 4. Siswa bertipe Camper mampu memenuhi 3 dari 4 indikator kemampuan pemecahan masalah yaitu indikator 1, 2, dan 3. Siswa bertipe Quitter hanya mampu memenuhi 1 indikator kemampuan pemecahan masalah yaitu indikator 2.

Analysis of students' problem-solving abilities in solving word problem sequence in terms of adversity quotient

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe the students' problem-solving abilities in solving word problems in the sequences material in terms of Adversity Quotient (AQ). Problem-solving has four indicators namely: 1) overcoming the problem, 2) formulating the problem, 3) implementing the strategy, and 4) verifying the solution. The study was conducted in the even semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. The research subjects consisted of 30 students of class XI IPA 1 of Kesatrian 1 Semarang High School who had taught the sequences material. Then the subject was chosen based on the type of AQ namely climber, camper and quitter. Data collection techniques using the AQ questionnaire, the problem-solving test, and interview. The data analysis techniques of this study include data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results showed that students of the climber type were able to meet all the indicators of the four indicators of problem-solving namely indicators 1, 2, 3, and 4. Students of the camper type were able to fulfill three from four indicators of problem-solving namely indicators 1, 2, and 3. Students' quitter type were only able to meet one indicator of problem-solving, namely indicator 2.

Keywords

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah; soal cerita; adversity quotient; problem-solving abilities; word problem

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

Amri, M. S., & Abadi, A. M. (2013). Pengaruh PMR dengan TGT terhadap motivasi, sikap, dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah geometri kelas VII SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 55-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i1.8494

Arfiana, A., & Wijaya, A. (2018). Problem solving skill of students of senior high schools and Islamic high schools in Tegal Regency in solving the problem of PISA based on Polya’s stage. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 211-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i2.15783

Bransford, J., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers' approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152-160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi Sekolah Dasar.

Espaňola, R. P. (2016). Adversity Quotient (AQ) and academic performance of selected students in MSU Marawi City. Proceedings Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Science Research Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3136617

Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 293-307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00006-6

Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problem. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520-532. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/vol76/520-532.Hadi_Vol.76-4_PEC.pdf

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Retrieved from https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_Nomor021.pdf/

Khairani, A. Z., & Abdullah, S. M. S. (2018). Relationship between adversity quotient and academic well-being among malaysian undergraduates. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 11(1), 51-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2018.51.55

Kong, J. E., & Orosco, M. J. (2016). Word-problem-solving strategy for minority students at risk for math difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(3), 171–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607347

Mardika, F., & Insani, S. U. (2017). Adversity quotientand student’s problem solving skill in mathematics. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science (4th ICRIEMS). Retrieved from http://seminar.uny.ac.id/icriems/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.icriems/files/prosiding2017/ME04%20Fitria%20Mardika.pdf

Marlissa, I., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2015). Pengaruh strategi REACT ditinjau dari gaya kognitif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah, prestasi belajar dan apresiasi siswa terhadap matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 186 -196. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7333

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications

Mustika, R., Yurniawati, Y., & Hakim, L. E. (2018). Hubungan self confidence dan adversity quotient terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. 18(2): 228-230. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JER/article/viewFile/12964/7675

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Ningrum, I. A. (2017). Analisis tingkat berpikir kreatif matematis peserta didik ditinjau dari adversity quotient kelas VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Bandar Lampung tahun ajaran 2016/2017 (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan, Lampung.

Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014). Relationship between adversity quotient and academic problems among student teachers. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(1), 23-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191172326

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Pronceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rianto, H., & Santoso, R. H. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran inquiry dan problem solving terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9055

Sajadi, M., Amiripour, P., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2013). The examining mathematical word problems solving ability under efficient representation aspect. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2013, 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.ispacs.com/journals/metr/2013/metr-00007/

Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity quotient: Mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang (Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities). (T. Hermaya, Trans.). Jakarta: PT Grasindo. Original work published in 2000.

Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Vierstraete, H. (1999). Upper elementary school pupils' difficulties in modeling and solving nonstandard additive word problems involving ordinal numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 265–285. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/749836

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(2), 211-213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004190927303

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024