Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan inquiry berorientasi kemampuan berpikir kritis

Alfizah Ayu Indria Sari; Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa

doi:10.21831/pg.v14i1.27303

Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan inquiry berorientasi kemampuan berpikir kritis

Alfizah Ayu Indria Sari, Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi Syariah (STES) Manna Wa Salwa, Indonesia
Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v14i1.27303

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran berupa Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) menggunakan pendekatan inquiry berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kritis dan rasa ingin tahu siswa yang berkualitas berdasarkan aspek valid, praktis dan efektif. Penelitian ini menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE dengan tahapan analisis, desain, pengembangan, implementasi, dan evaluasi. Subjek penelitian adalah 32 siswa kelas XI MIA 3 SMA Negeri 1 Godean. Analisis data kevalidan dan kepraktisan dilakukan dengan mengkonversi skor aktual menjadi skor kualitatif. Analisis keefektifan dilakukan dengan menentukan persentase ketuntasan siswa pada tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan rata-rata skor angket rasa ingin tahu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan inquiry yang berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kritis dan rasa ingin tahu siswa telah memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis dan efektif.

Developing a learning kit using an inquiry approach oriented to critical thinking skill

Abstract

This study aimed to produce a learning kit using the inquiry approach oriented to students’ critical thinking skills and curiosity which has a good quality in the aspects of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This study was research and development that used the ADDIE model, which includes the steps of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The subjects were 32 of 11th-grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Godean (Senior High School), Province of Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The data of validity and practicality were analyzed by converting the actual score into qualitative data. The data of effectiveness were done by determining the percentage of student that passed the critical thinking skill tests and the mean scores of students' curiosity questionnaire. The results of this study were a teaching kit using the inquiry approach oriented to students' critical thinking skill and curiosity has met the criterion of valid, practical, and effective.

Keywords

perangkat pembelajaran matematika; pendekatan inquiry; kemampuan berpikir kritis; rasa ingin tahu; learning kit; Inquiry approach; critical thinking skill; curiosity

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educatinal Research, 2(1), 37-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104

Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing critical thinking skill from dispositions to abilities: Mathematics education from early childhood to high school. Creative Education, 6(1), 455-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ ce.2015.64045

Anggraeni, N. W., Ristiati, N. P., & Widiyanti, P. M. (2013). Implementasi strategi pembelajaran inkuiri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 1-11. Retrieved from http://oldpasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ipa/ article/view/752

Arp, L., Woodard, B. S., & Hansley, R. B. (2004). Curiosity and creativity as attributes of information literacy. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 44(1), 31-36.

Asgharheidari, F., & Tahriri, A. (2015). A survey of EFL teachers’ attitudes towards critical thinking instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 388-396. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0602.20

Astika, I. K. U., Suma, I. K., & Suastra, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap sikap ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 1-10. Retrieved from http://oldpasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/851

Bayer, B. K. (1990). What philosophy offers to teaching thinking [Versi elektronik]. Educational Leadership, 2(1), 55-60. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199002_beyer.pdf

Bundu, P. (2006). Penilaian keterampilan proses dan sikap ilmiah dalam pembelajaran sains SD. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Chiappetta, E. L., & Collate, A.T. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools thrid edition. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Chambers, P. (2008). Teaching mathematics. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Conklin, W. (2012). Higher order thinking skill to develop 21st century learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education Publishing.

Damanik, D. P., & Bukit, N. (2013). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis dan sikap ilmiah pada pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model pembelajaran inquiry training dan direct instruction. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 16-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v2i1.4333

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of education assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

Fatmawati, H., Mardiyana, M., & Triyanto, T. (2014). Analisis berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan polya pada pokok bahasan persamaan kuadrat. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(9), 899-910. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math/article/view/4830

Firdaus, F., Kailani, I., Bakar, M. N. B., & Bakry, B. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills of students in mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 226-236. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/72687-EN-developing-critical-thinking-skills-of-s.pdf

Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry based learning: A review of the research literature (online). Retrieved from http://goo.gl/IIJmDn

Freeley, A. (2001). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: University Press Cambridge.

Jarett, D. (1997). Inquiry strategies for science and mathematics learning: It’s just good teaching. New York, NY: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 65 Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses.

Kemendikbud. (2014a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 59 Tahun 2013 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah.

Kemendikbud. (2014b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menegah.

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari A. K. (2007). Guided inquiry learning in the 21st century. London, UK : Greenwood Publishing Group.

Kunandar, K. (2013). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Maw, W., & Maw, E. (1963). The differences between the scores of children with high curiosity and children withlow curiosity ona test of general information. Journal of Education Research, 57(2), 76-79. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27531352

McElmeel, S. L. (2002). Character education: A book guide for teachers, librarians and parents. Englewood, CO: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2009). Inquiry-based science instruction- what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 474-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

Moon, B., Mayes, A. S., & Hutchinson, S. (2002). Teaching, learning and the curriculum in secondary school. New York, NY : Routledge.

Moore, K. D. (2009). Effective instructional strategies, from theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototype to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, N. Nieveen (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125-136). Dordretch: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Nurgiyantoro, B. 2005. Tahapan perkembangan anak dan pemilihan bacaan sastra anak. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXIV(2), 198-216. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v0i2.369

Renner, B. (2006). Curiosity about people: the development of a social curiosity measure in adults. Journal of Personality Assesment, 83(3), 305-316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_11

Sagala, S. (2011). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran. Bandung: Alpabeta.

Suhartini, S., & Santoso, R. H. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika untuk siswa SMK jurusan akuntansi di Sleman dengan pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 69-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2665

Sumarno, S., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran pada materi pokok kalkulus SMA kelas XI semester 2. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 257-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2680

Thompson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: process over output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1-7. Retrieved from https://www.ijhssnet.com/journal/index/263

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i1.27303