Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan PBL berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan self-efficacy

Lisda Fitriana Masitoh; Hatono Hartono

doi:10.21831/pg.v12i2.15769

Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan PBL berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan self-efficacy

Lisda Fitriana Masitoh, Universitas Pamulang Tangerang, Indonesia
Hatono Hartono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v12i2.15769

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan Problem Based Learning (PBL) berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan self-efficacy matematika siswa SMP yang layak. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam jenis penelitian dan pengembangan. Model pengembangan diadaptasi dari model pengembangan Borg & Gall. Subjek penelitian adalah 32 siswa kelas VII-3 SMP N 5 Yogyakarta. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah lembar validasi, angket penilaian guru, angket penilaian siswa, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, tes prestasi belajar materi transformasi, tes prestasi belajar materi statistika dan peluang, tes berpikir kreatif materi transformasi, tes berpikir kreatif materi statistika dan peluang serta angket self-efficacy matematika. Penelitian ini menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran matematika yang terdiri dari 7 RPP dan 25 LKS untuk siswa SMP kelas VII semester genap. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran layak digunakan karena memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis dan efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan self-efficacy matematika siswa.

Developing Mathematics Instructional Materials Using Pbl Approach Oriented to Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy

Abstract

This study aimed to produce the mathematics instructional materials using Problem Based Learning (PBL) approach oriented to creative thinking ability and mathematics self-efficacy of Junior High School students which is proper to use. This study is categorized as research and development. Development model of instructional materials in this study was adapted from Borg & Gall development model. The subjects of this research were 32 students of class VII-3 SMP N 5 Yogyakarta. The research instruments were validation sheets, questionnaire assessment for teachers, questionnaire assessment for students, learning implemented observation sheets, achievement test of material transformation, achievement test of material statistics and probabilty, creative thinking test of material transformation, creative thinking test of material statistics and probabilty and mathematics self-efficacy questionnaire. This research resulted in mathematics instructional materials that consist of 7 lesson plans and 25 student worksheets for Junior High School students of class VII even semester. The result shows that the instructional materials proper to use because the instructional materials are valid, practical and effective in terms of student’s creative thinking ability and mathematics self-efficacy.

Keywords

pengembangan; perangkat pembelajaran; PBL; berpikir kreatif; self-efficacy

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Ajai, J. T., & Imoko, B. I. (2015). Gender differences in mathematics achievement and retention score: A case of problem based learning method. International Journal of research in Education and Science, 1 (1), 45-50.

Angkotasan, N. (2013). Model PBL dan cooperative learning tipe TAI ditinjau dari aspek kemampuan berpikir reflektif dan pemecahan masalah matematis. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 92-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i1.8497

Arends, R. I. (2008). Learning to teach: belajar untuk mengajar. (Terjemahan Helly Prajitno Soetjipto & Sri Mulyani Soetjipto). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Companies. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2007).

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

Azwar, S. (2015). Tes prestasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Bano, A., Naseer, N., & Zainab (2014). Creativity and academic performance of primary school children. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 34 (2), 598-606.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research an introduction. New York, NY: Longman.

Botty, H. M. R. H., & Shahrill, M. (2015). Narrating a teacher’s use of structured problem-based learning in a mathematics lesson. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanitie, 4 (1), 156-164.

Cahyono, A.E.Y. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Problem-Based Learning Berorientasi pada Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Inisiatif Siswa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14052.

Chakrabarty, S., & Mohamed, N. (2013). Problem based learning: Cultural diverse students’ engagement, learning and contextualized problem solving in a mathematics class. Wcik E-Journal of Integration Knowledge, 38-49.

Crow, L. D., & Crow, A. (1977). Psikologi pendidikan. (Terjemahan Drs. Z. Kasijan). New York, NY: American Book Company. (buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1954).

Djidu, H., & Jailani, J. (2017). Aktivitas pembelajaran matematika yang dapat melatih kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 312–321. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21614.

Djidu, H., & Jailani, J. (2018). Developing problem based calculus learning model. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 2(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.21831/JK.V2I1.12689

Eragamreddy, N. (2013). Teaching creative thinking skills. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1 (2), 124-145.

Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: supporting the efforts of K–12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005

Fast, L. A., Lewis, J., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Self-efficacy and standardized test performance. Diakses tanggal 22 Juli 2015 dari http://rap.ucr.edu/efficacy.pdf.

Fatade, A. O., Mogari, D., & Arigbabu, A. A. (2013). Effect of problem-based learning on senior secondary school students’ achievements in Further mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6 (3), 29-44.

Gorman, R. M. (1974). The psychology of classroom learning: an inductive approach. Columbus, OH: Meril Publishing Company.

Happy, N., & Widjajanti, D. (2014). Keefektifan PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis, serta self-esteem siswa smp. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2663.

Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. Zentralblattfur Didaktik der Mathematics, 29 (3), 68-74.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. California, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problem: A handbook for designing problem solving learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.

Khamid, A., & Santoso, R. H. (2016). Keefektifan Pendekatan PBL dan CTL Ditinjau dari Komunikasi Matematis dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10660.

Lefrancois, G. R. (2000). Psychology for teaching. London, ENG: Wadsworth Thamson Learning.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self efficacy in the workplace: impilication for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Bussissnes, and Administratio, 14 (1), 1-6.

Mahmudi. A. (2010). Mengukur kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Dipresentasikan dalam Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV. Manado: UNIMA.

Mardapi, D. (2004). Penyusunan Tes Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: UNY.

May, D. K. (2009). Mathematics self-efficacy and anxiety questionnaire. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, University of Georgia, Georgia. Diambil pada tanggal 22 Desember 2015, dari https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/may_diana_k_200908_phd.pdf.

McGredor, D. (2007). Developing thinking; developing learning: A guide to thinking skills in education. New York, NY: Open University Press.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Dalam J.V. den Aker, et al. Design approaches and tools in education and training. (pp. 125-136). London, ENG: ICO Cluwer Academic Publisher.

Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education, 34 (9), 721-728.

Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving: a path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.

Palfrey, R. (2000). Open-ended questions for mathematics. Diambil pada tanggal 1 September 2015, dari https://www.uky.edu/OtherOrgs/ARSI/www.uky.edu/pub/arsi/openresponsequestions/mathorq.pdf.

Perez, E. D., & Ye, Y. (2013). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement of mathayomsuksa students in the english program of st. Joseph bangna school. Assumption Journal, 5(2), 82-92.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 1-10.

Rahayu, E., & Hartono, H. (2016). Keefektifan Model PBL dan PjBL Ditinjau dari Prestasi, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/PG.V11I1.9629

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (5th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.

Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effect of problem based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 99 (5), 307-317.

Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problem as possibilities: Problem based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Uden, L., & Beaumont, C. (2006). Technology and problem based learning. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson educational, Inc.

Wrigth, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood. London, ENG: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-Efficacy and educational development. Dalam Bandura, A. Self-efficacy in changing societies. (pp. 202-231). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational Psychology, 25, 82-9.

Zimmerman, M., Bescherer, C., & Spannagel, C. (2011). A questionaire for surveying mathematics self-efficacy expectations of future teachers. Diambil pada tanggal 4 Desember 2015, dari http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/14/CERME7-WG14-Paper---Zimmermann,-Bescherer-&-Spannagel-REVISED-Dec2010.pdf

Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i2.15769