Pengembangan pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing untuk meningkatkan berpikir kritis dan motivasi belajar geometri di SMP

Siti Nuriyatin; Hartono Hartono

doi:10.21831/pg.v11i2.10656

Pengembangan pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing untuk meningkatkan berpikir kritis dan motivasi belajar geometri di SMP

Siti Nuriyatin, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Jalan Colombo No 1, Karangmalang, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
Hartono Hartono, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Jalan Colombo No 1, Karangmalang, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v11i2.10656

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis penemuan terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan motivasi belajar matematika pada bangun ruang di SMP. Perangkat yang dikembangkan meliputi silabus, 3 RPP, 8 handout, 8 LKS, 1 perangkat tes ketercapain pada bangun ruang sisi datar; serta silabus, 3 RPP, 2 handout, 4 LKS, 1 perangkat tes ketercapaian kompetensi pada bangun ruang sisi lengkung. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan (research &development) dengan menggunakan model pengembangan 4D yaitu define, design, development, dan disseminate. Kevalidan perangkat ditinjau dari penilaian para ahli, kepraktisan ditinjau dari penilaian guru, penilaian peserta didik, dan observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran. Keefektifan ditinjau dari tes ketercapaian kompetensi, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan motivasi belajar matematika peserta didik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan valid, praktis, dan efektif.

Kata kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, penemuan terbimbing, berpikir kritis, motivasi belajar matematika

Developing of guided inquiry-based learning to increase critical thinking and motivation to learn on geometry in junior high school

Abstract

This research is aimed to describe the development phase of guided inquiry-based learning package to increase critical thinking ablity and motivation to learn mathematics on solid figures and describe the quality of the developed product. The learning package consist of syllabus, 3 lesson plans, 8 handouts, 8 student work sheets, a competency achievement test on plane solid figure; and syllabus, 3 lesson plans, 2 handouts, 4 student work sheets, a competency achievement test on curve solid figure. This research is a developmental research study. The model of the instructional package in this research was adapted from 4-D development model. It consisted of five phases: define, design, develop, dan disseminate. The result of validation by expert jugdement shows that the kit that is developed is of valid category for each learning kit that has been developed. The aspects of practicality was of very practice category as seen from the evaluation by the teachers, evaluation by the students, and implementation of the learning. The aspect of effectiveness could be reached from the competency achievement test results, critical thinking ability test results, and the results of questionnaires of student’s motivation to learn mathematics. The result of this research is an instructional package component on solid figures is valid, practical, and effective.

Keywords: development, instructional package, guided inquiry, critical thinking, motivation to learn mathematics

Keywords

pengembangan; perangkat pembelajaran; penemuan terbimbing; berpikir kritis; motivasi belajar matematika

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Anggraeni, N., Ristiati, N., & Widiyanti, N. (2013). Implementasi strategi pembelajaran inkuiri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SMP. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 3(2), 1-11.

Arends, R., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning, becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Routledge.

Azwar, S. (2002). Sikap manusia teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bell, F. H. (1981). Teaching and learning mathematics (In secondary school). Dubuque, IO: Wm. C. Brown Company.

Bruner, J. S. (2006). In search of pedagogy: Volume 1. New York, NY: Routledge.

Carin, A. A., & Sund, R. B. (1989). Teaching science through discoverry. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publising Company.

Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills, developing effective analysis and argument. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Depdiknas. (2002). Pendekatan kontekstual. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan.

Depdiknas. (2003). Penjelasan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Depdiknas (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 2007, tentang Standar Proses Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Elliott, S., et. al. (2000). Educational psychology: effective teaching, effective learning (3th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: an outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Hermosa Beach, CA: The California Academic Press.

Fisher, A. (2009). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

French, D. (2004). Teaching and learning geometry: issues and methods in mathematical education. New York, NY: Continum.

Gredler, M. (2011). Learning and instruction(6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Imawan, O. R. (2015). Perbandingan antara keefektifan model guided discovery learning dan project-based learning pada matakuliah geometri. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 179-188. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i2.9156.

Kemp, J., Morrison, G., & Ross, S. (1994). Designing effective instruction. New York, NY: Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Kuhlthau, C. et al. (2007). Guided inquiry, learning in the 21st century. London, UK: Libraries Unlimited.

Kuhlthau, C. (2010). Guided inquiry: school libraries in the 21st century. The International Association of School Librarianship, 16(1), 17-28.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: a literature review. http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf.

Lunenburg, F. (2012). Teachers’ use of theoretical frames for instructional planning: critical thinking, cognitive, and constructivist theories. International Journal Of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 14(1), 1-9.

Masduki, dkk. (2013, November). Level kognitif soal-soal buku pelajaran matematika SMP. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika “Penguatan Peran Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika untuk Indonesia yang Lebih Baik”, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Moore, K. D. (2009). Effective instructional strategies: From teory to practice. London, UK: SAGE Publication.

Moore, B. & Stanley, T. (2010). Critical thinking and formative assessments: increasing the rigor in your classroom. New York, NY: Eye on Education.

Nieveen, N., et.al. (1999). Design approaches and tools in educationand. Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Rosnawati, R. (2013, Mei). Kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa SMP Indonesia pada TIMSS 2011. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S. Dan Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for tarining teachers of exceptional children. Minnepolis, MA: University of Minnesota.

Throwbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1986). Becoming secondary school science teacher (4th ed). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

Uno, H. (2006). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Yuliyanto, Y., & Jailani, J. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran geometri SMP menggunakan metode penemuan terbimbing pada kelas VIII semester II. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 127-138. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2670

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10656