Traceability model system as originality assurance method for honey product, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v17i2.42602Keywords:
Distribution, Honey, Originality, Stakeholders, TraceabilityAbstract
Honey is a hype product as immunity booster in the health shock covid-19. Unbalance of supply and demand has raised the price and made the consumer could not afford it. Besides that, global issue about unoriginal honey which spreads in society has made the consumer has negative stigma on SMEs honey product because it does not have complete food safety certification as commercial company. Objective of the research was to increase the consumer trust through originality assurance for honey product from traceability system. The research is a case study with FGD method and then followed by Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) analysis and Business Process Notation as solution. Result of the research showed that the distribution aspect has great power to affect the stakeholder and logistic aspects, due to success of both aspects are determined by distribution aspect. While the stakeholder aspect does not have any power to affect other aspect because if the business system has correct SOP, then both aspects will have appropriate supply chain management. Therefore, the solution is business process improvisation, so that to increase the trust local brand for honey product, it must be optimized through recording system of customer journey, so that the producer could trace the barrier and enabler factors about perspective of the honey originality
References
Arifah, N. (2020). Manajemen perubahan dalam mewujudkan madrasah berprestasi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 4(1). 57-70. https://doi.org/10.52431/murobbi.v4i1.235
Bahadori, M., Teymourzadeh, E., Tajik, H., Ravangard, R., Raadabadi, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2018). Factors affecting strategic plan implementation using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International journal of health care quality assurance. 31(5).406-414. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2017-0075
Banwet, M, N, F, D, K. & Shankar,R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: Modeling the enablers. Bussiness Process Management Journal. 12(4),535–552.
Bappenas, BPS & UNFPA. (2018). Proyeksi penduduk Indonesia 2015-2045: Hasil SUPAS 2015. BPS.
Cecilia S, G. (2010). Importance of reverse logistics for retail. The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies Romania.
Chopra S & Meindl P. (2001). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation. Prentice-Hall. Inc.
Davison, R., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information systems journal, 14(1), 65-86. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.190&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Gardas, B., Raut, R., Jagtap, A. H., & Narkhede, B. (2019). Exploring the key performance indicators of green supply chain management in agro-industry. Journal of Modelling in Management. 14(1). 260-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2017-0139
Handayani DI. (2014). Risiko rantai pasok minuman sari apel dalam perspektif sistem traceability. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknologi Industri. 9(1). 57-68. https://doi.org/10.12777/jati.9.1.57-68
Iwan, V. (2017). Halal traceability system pada supply chain makanan. Catatan Scl.
Kementerian Perdagangan. (2015). Market brief produk perikanan di Hongaria. Kementerian Perdagangan.
Kotler, P & Keller, K,L. (2012). Marketing manajemen edisi keempat belas. Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc
Nurmalia, N. &Nurani, F. (2019). Strategi kepemimpinan dalam perubahan ekonomi G-20. Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi., Universitas Brawijaya. 1–12.
Olsen, P., & Borit, M. (2013). How to define traceability. Trends in food science & technology, 29(2), 142-150. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2012.10.003
Pfohl, H. C, Gallus, P.,& D. Thomas. (2011). Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks. Internasional Journal Phys. Distribution Logistic Management. 41(9). 839-859. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111175816
Saremi H. & Mosavi S. (2014). Management of distribution channels.
Schiffman, L. G. & Wisenblit, J. L. (2015). Consumer behavior edisi 11 global edition. Pearson Education Limited
Wisenblit, L. G. S. dan J. L. (2015). Consumer behavior. Pearson Education.
Yang, Y & Bao,W. (2011). The design and implementation of halal beef wholly quality traceability system. dalam Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture IV, in D Li, YLiu & Y Chen (eds), Springer, vol. 346, Boston,464–472.
Yin, k,R. (2003). Studi kasus, desain, dan metode. PT Grafindo Persada.
Yohana, N. D. & Marisa,F. (2018). Perancangan proses bisnis sistem human resource management (HRM) untuk meningkatkan kinerja pegawai. JIMF: Jurnal Informatika Merdeka Pasuruan. 3(2). 23-32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).