The implementation of authentic assessment in history learning at senior high school
Aman Aman, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of authentic assessment in history learning in Senior High School (SMA), which is adjusted with assessment procedures related to the judgment of competencies that have been made by the government. This study is a qualitative naturalistic study conducted in SMA N 1 Ngaglik and SMA N 2 Sleman, Yogyakarta. The technique of data collection was done through observation, interview, and documentation. The data analysis technique was done by triangulation. The result of the study shows that: both schools carried out an authentic assessment in learning activities, although in its application, there some shortcomings. 1) Planning, both schools have been made a planning assessment that includes attitude assessment, knowledge, and skill assessment, although the teacher of history in both schools still has not made a grid for knowledge assessment. 2) Appraisal, both schools conducted attitude assessment through observation technique and peer assessment, while SMA N 2 Sleman conducted attitude assessment by self-assessment technique. Knowledge assessment was conducted by the workbook, Deuteronomy, PTS, and PAS; besides written tests assessment in SMA N 2, Sleman was also undertaken by oral tests. They were assessing skill both of school conducted by using performance assessment in papers form. 3) Processing of attitude assessment activity conducted by doing coordinating with BK teachers and homeroom teachers. While assessing knowledge and skill performed by calculating average the value obtained. 4) Follow-up activities carried out by conducting written tests, whereas, in SMA N 1, Ngaglik added an oral test technique.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aman. (2011). Model evaluasi pembelajaran sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Azim, S., & Khan, M. (2012). Authentic assessment: An instructional tool to enhance students learning. Academic Research International, 2(3), 314.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Ditjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2017). Panduan penilaian oleh pendidik dan satuan pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Atas.
Hasan, S. H. (2013). History education in curriculum 2013: A new approach to teaching history. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 14(1), 163-178.
Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): Implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal penelitian dan evaluasi pendidikan, 20(2), 131-141.
Majid, A., & Firdaus, A. (2014). Penilaian autentik proses dan hasil belajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mardiana, S., & Sumiyatun, S. (2017). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran sejarah di SMA Negeri 1 Metro. HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(1), 45-54.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.
Muhadjir, N. (2002). Metode penelitian kualtatif edisi IV. Yogyakrta: Rake Sarasin.
Muhidin, A. (2013). The 2013 curriculum: stands on two contradictive traditions. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 14(1).
Novianto, A., & Mustadi, A. (2015). Analisis buku teks muatan tematik integratif, scientific approach, dan authentic assessment sekolah dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 45(1).
Pujiono, S. (2014). Kesiapan guru bahasa Indonesia SMP dalam implementasi Kurikulum 2013. LITERA, 13(2).
Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(3).
Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(3).
Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2017). Implementasi pemanfaatan software penulisan laporan hasil belajar siswa SMK pada pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(1), 30-42.
Rusman, R. (2015). Pembelajaran tematik terpadu. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sani, R. A. (2016). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sardiman, S. (2015). Menakar Posisi Sejarah Indonesia pada Kurikulum 2013. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sejarah, 11(2).
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166-178.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tatang., M. A (2010). Manajemen pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 2(1), 2.
Yusof, N., Amin, M. M., Arshad, M., Dahlan, H. M., & Mustafa, N. (2012). Authentic assessment of industrial training program: experience of universiti teknologi Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 724-729.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v15i2.25229
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Sulis Setiani Kusuma Dewi, Aman Aman
Supervised by
Our Journal has been Indexed by
Journal of Social Studies (JSS) by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jss is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.