Pengembangan perangkat assessment pembelajaran matematika pokok bahasan geometri dan pengukuran SMP/MTs

Robert Edy Sudarwan; Heri Retnawati

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7344

Pengembangan perangkat assessment pembelajaran matematika pokok bahasan geometri dan pengukuran SMP/MTs

Robert Edy Sudarwan, Universitas Islam Negeri Lampung, Indonesia
Heri Retnawati, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7344

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengembangkan produk perangkat assessment pembelajaran pada pokok bahasan geometri dan pengukuran yang berorientasi pada aspek pengetahuan, keterampilan dan sikap peserta didik SMP/MTs kelas VII dan VIII sebagai hasil pengembangan berdasarkan kajian teori, pendapat ahli, dan pendapat pengguna dengan kualifikasi baik; dan (2) mendeskripsikan kualitas produk assessment pembelajaran pada pokok bahasan geometri dan pengukuran yang berorientasi pada aspek pengetahuan, keterampilan dan sikap peserta didik SMP/MTs kelas VII dan VIII berdasarkan aspek kevalidan, kepratisan dan keefektifan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan untuk menghitung reliabilitas dengan menggunakan α-reliability, untuk α ≥ 60 maka reliabel. Percentage of Agrements (PA) untuk mengetahui tingkat kesepakatan antar pengamat, dengan PA ≥ 70 maka tepenuhi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) produk pengembangan perangkat assessment pembelajaran pokok bahasan geometri dan pengukuran yang berorientasi pada aspek pengetahuan, keterampilan dan sikap peserta didik SMP/MTs kelas VII dan VIII sebagai hasil pengembangan berdasarkan kajian teori, pendapat ahli, dan pendapat pengguna mencapai tarap kualifikasi baik. (2) kualitas produk assessment pembelajaran pada pokok bahasan geometri dan pengukuran yang berorientasi pada aspek pengetahuan, keterampilan dan sikap peserta didik SMP/MTs kelas VII dan VIII berdasarkan aspek kevalidan, kepratisan dan keefektifan telah terpenuhi dengan kualitas baik.

Kata kunci: assessment, perangkat, matematika.

Developing Mathematic Assessment Product of Learning Geometric and Measuring for Students Junior High School

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: (1) to develop mathematic assessment product of learning tools for geometric and measuring subject that was oriented to knowledge, skill, and attitude aspect for students of junior high school grade 7 and 8 according to literature, expert judgement, and user’s opinion that has good qualification; (2) to know the quality of assessment product of geometric and measuring learning tools that was oriented to knowledge, skill, and attitude aspect of students in Junior High School grade 7 and 8 according to validity, effiiciency, and effectiveness aspect. The data were analyzed using α-reliability and precentage of aggrement (PA). It’s realiable for α ≥ 60, while the precentage of aggrement was to know the agreement between observer, it’s fulfilled if PA ≥ 70. The results of this research show that: (1) the development product assessment of learning tools for geometric and mesuring subject that is oriented to knowledge, skill, and attitude aspect for students of junior high school grade 7 and 8 according to literature, expert judgement, and user’s opinion has good qualification; (2) the quality of assessment product of geometric and measuring learning tools that is oriented to knowledge, skill, and attitude aspect of students in Junior High School grade 7 and 8 according to validity, efficiency, and effectiveness aspect is fulfilled well.

Keyword: assessment, tools, math

Keywords

assessment; perangkat; matematika

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W.M. (1978). Introduction to meansurement theory. California: Wadsworth,Inc.

Azwar, Saifuddin. (2002). Tes prestasi: fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Brookhart, S.M., & Nitko, A.J. (2008). Assessment and grading in classrooms. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D.A. (1991). Essentials of educational meansurement. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Haylock, D., & Thangata, F. (2007). Key concepts in teaching primary mathematics. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Introduction to Student-Involved Assessment FOR Learning.Classroom Assessment for Student Success [versi electronik]. Diambil pada tanggal 3 April 2014, dari http://jan.ucc.nau.edujf36chapter1stiggins.pdf.

Johnson, D.W., & Jhonson, R.T. (2002). Meaningful assessment; a managable and cooperative process. Boston: Person Education Company.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Materi Pelatihan Guru Implemantasi Kurikulum 2013, SMP/MTs Matematika.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 68, Tahun 2013, Tentang Kerangka Dasar Struktur Kurikulum SMP/MTs.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 66, Tahun 2013, Tentang Standar Penilaian

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 81 A, Tahun 2013, Tentang Implementasi Kurikulum

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 65, Tahun 2013, Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan.

Key Stages 1 & 2. (2007). Council for the curriculum, examinations and assessment, assessment for learning. Belfast: A PMB Publication, [versi electronik]. Diambil pada tanggal 25 Maret 2014, dari http://www.nicurriculum.org.ukdocsassessment_for_learningtrainingafl-guidance-ks12.pdf

Mardapi, Djemari. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika

Miller, M.D., Linn, R.L., & Gronlund, N.E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Nieveen, Nienke. (1999). “Prototyping to reach product quality”. In Jan Van den Akker, R.M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & Tj. Plomp (Eds). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp 125-135). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Nitko, A.J,. & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational assessment of students. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Nitko, A.J,. & Brookhart, S.M.. (2011). Library of congress cataloging-in-publication data. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Panggabean, M. (2000). Studi tentang penilaian pembelajaran matematika sekolah di SMU Medan. Tesis, tidak diterbitkan, Univeristas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya.

Peraturan Pemerintah No.19. (2005). Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan

Peraturan Pemerintah No.28. (1990). Tentang Pendidikan Dasar

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research. Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curiculum development

Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment what teacher need to know. University of California: Los Angeles.

Reynolds, C.R., Livingston, R.B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Rick, Stiggins. & Chappuis, Jan. Using Student-Involved Classroom Assessment to Close Achievement Gaps, Journal Into Pratice, 44 1,11-18. http://florin.pbworks.comfUsing+Studentinvolved+assessmentpdf.pdf. Diambil pada 4 Februari 2014

Sriraman, Bharath. (2007). Perspectives on Talent Development in Mathematics Education. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education:. Volume 6 No. 1&2.

Sriraman, Bharath. (2010). Theories of mathematics education. London: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Stiggins, R.J., Arter, J.A., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2007). Classroom assessment for student learning. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc

Tilaar, H.A.R. (2012). Kaleiodoskop pendidikan nasional. Jakarta: Kompas.

Undang-Undang No 2 (1989). Tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.

Undang-Undang No 20 (2003). Tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7344