Efektivitas PBL setting TTW dan TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa

Wahyu Hardiyanto, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Rusgianto Heri Santoso, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.11127

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa.

 

The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy

 

Abstract

This study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.


Keywords


problem-based learning (PBL); think talk write; think pair share; prestasi belajar siswa; berpikir kritis; self-efficacy; academic achievement; critical thinking skills

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Basham, Irwin, Nardone, and Wallace. (2011). Critical thinking a student’s introduction. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Djidu, H., & Jailani. (2016). Fostering student’s higher-order thinking skill through problem-based learning in calculus. In Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science (pp. 127–130). Yogyakarta: Faculty of Mathematics and Science-Yogyakarta State University. Retrieved from http://seminar.uny.ac.id­/icriems/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.­icriems/files/prosiding/ME-19.pdf

Djidu, H., & Jailani, J. (2017). Aktivitas pembelajaran matematika yang dapat melatih kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 312–321. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.­ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21614

Farhan, M & Retnawati, H. (2014). The effectiveness of PBL and IBL in terms of achievement, mathematical representation capabilities, and motivation. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1 (2), 227-240.

Fatade, A. O., Mogari D., & Arigbabu A. A (2013). Effect of problem-based learning on senior secondary school students’ achievements in further mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6(3), 27-44.

Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS (cetakan ke-7). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Happy, N. & Widjajanti, B.W. (2014). Keefektifan PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis, serta self-esteem siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1 (1), 48-57.

Hendriana, H. (2009). Pembelajaran dengan pendekatan metaphorical thinking untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematik, komunikasi matematik dan kepercayaan diri siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Disertasi Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI. Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Jailani, J., Sugiman, S., & Apino, E. (2017). Implementing the problem-based learning in order to improve the students’ HOTS and characters. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 247–259. https://doi.­org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.17674

Johnson, R. A. & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Karaduman, G. B. (2013). The relationship between prospective primary mathematics teachers attitudes towards Problem-Based Learning and their studying tendencies. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4, 1309-6249.

Mason, M. (2008). Critical thinking and learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Mendikbud RI. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum SMP. Jakarta: Kemendikbud RI.

Mokhtar, M. Z., Tarmizi, R. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Nawawi, M. D. H. (2013). Motivation and performance in learning calculus through problem-based learning. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(9), 1999–2005. Retrieved from http://www.aessweb.com/pdf-files/Ijass-si-3(9)-1999-2005.pdf

Nezami, N. R., Asgari, M. & Dinarvand, H. (2013). The effect of cooperative learning on the critical thinking of high school students. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(19): 2508-2514.

Ningrum, R. K. (2017). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa menggunakan problem based learning berbasis flexible mathematical thinking. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 213–222. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21620

Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Merrill Prentice Hall.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230.

Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers’ strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10317a.

Reynolds, C. R, Livingston, R. B., & Wilson, V. (2010) Measurement and assessment in education. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Rohaeti, E. E. (2008). Pembelajaran dengan pendekatan eksplorasi untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematik siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Disertasi: tidak diterbitkan. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI.

Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2016). Perangkat pembelajaran matematika bercirikan PBL untuk mengembangkan HOTS siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10631.

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for sosial science (5th ed). New York, NY: Routledge

Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: using problems to power learning in the 21st Century. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research. New york, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Trop, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities problem-based learning for K-16 education. (2nd edition). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.11127

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika indexed by:

 

  

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All rights reserved. p-ISSN 2356-2684 | e-ISSN 2477-1503

View My Stats