The effect of CBT national examination policy in terms of senior high school students’ cognitive readiness and anxiety facing mathematics tests in DIY Province

Eny Sulistyaningsih; Sugiman Sugiman

doi:10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10868

The effect of CBT national examination policy in terms of senior high school students’ cognitive readiness and anxiety facing mathematics tests in DIY Province

Eny Sulistyaningsih, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sugiman Sugiman, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10868

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of CBT and PBT national examination in terms of students’ cognitive readiness and anxiety facing mathematics national examination in DIY province, the influence of major in terms of students’ cognitive readiness and anxiety facing mathematics national examination in DIY Province, and the interaction between national examination and major. This research was descriptive explorative and the method was ex-post facto. The population was all of natural and social science high school students in grade XII in DIY province. The number of sample used was 654 students The results showed that there was influence of national examination in terms of students’ cognitive readiness and anxiety facing national examination. CBT and PBT national examination did not influence the cognitive readiness facing national examination, CBT and PBT national examination influence in national examinations in terms of students’ anxiety facing national examination. The average score of the students’ anxiety facing CBT national exam was greater than that of the students’ anxiety facing PBT national examination. There was no effect caused by differences in majoring in terms of cognitive readiness and national examination math anxiety; and there was no interaction between the different types of national examinations and majors.

Keywords

national examination; CBT; PBT; cognitive readiness; anxiety

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Agustiar, W., & Asmi, Y. (2010). Kecemasan menghadapi ujian nasional dan motivasi belajar pada siswa kelas XII SMA Negeri “ X ” Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Psikologi, 8(1), 9–15. Retrieved from http://www.e-jurnal.com/2013/09/kecemasan-menghadapi-ujian-nasional-dan_29.html

Al-Amri, S. (2007). Computer-based vs. paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode matter? Proceedings of the BAAL Conference 2007 pg 101-110.

Bennet, R.E. (2003). Online assessment and the comparability of score meaning. Research Memorandum RM-03-05.

Bichi, A.A., & Musa, A. (2015). Assessing the correlation between continuous assessment and examination scores of education courses. American international journal of research in humanities, arts and social sciences page 290-294.

Burns, D.J. (2004). Anxiety at the time of final exam: Relationships with expectations and performance. Journal of Education for Bussiness page 119-124.

Dobson, C. (2012). Effect of academic anxiety on the performance of students with and without learning disabilities and how students can cope with anxiety at school. Thesis, not printed, Northern Michigan University, Michigan.

Hamalik, O. (2005). Perencanaan pengajaran berdasarkan pendekatan sistem. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harjanto. (2000). Perencanaan pengajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Leonard, & Supardi U.S. (2010). Pengaruh konsep diri, sikap siswa pada matematika, dan kecemasan siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 29(3), 341–352. Retrieved from http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/362

Mardapi, D. (2012). Dampak ujian nasional pada karakter bangsa. Presented at national seminar of Postgraduate program of Yogyakarta State University and Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI) 2012.

Marsigit. (2003). Metodologi pembelajaran matematika. Presented at elementary school teacher visited in Mathematics and Science Faculty of Yogyakarta State University.

Mendikbud. (2015). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan Republik Indonesia nomor 5, tahun 2015 tentang kriteria kelulusan peserta didik, penyelenggaraan ujian nasional, dan penyelenggaraan ujian sekolah/madrasah/pendidikan kesetaraan pada SMP/MTS atau yang sederajat dan SMA/MA/SMK atau yang sederajat.

Naga, D.S. (1992). Pengantar teori sekor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma.

Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart. (2011). Educational assessment of student (6th ed). Boston: Pearson.

Piaw, C. Y. (2012). Replacing paper-based testing with computer-based testing in assessment: Are we doing wrong? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64(0), 655–664. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.077

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respon butir dan penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Retnawati, H. (2015). The comparison of accuracy scores on the paper and pencil testing vs. computer based testing. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-Oktober 2015 volume 14 issue 4, 135-142.

Rumasoreng, M., & Sugiman, S. (2014). Analisis kesulitan matematika siswa SMA/MA dalam menyelesaikan soal setara UN di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 22-34. Retrieved fromhttp://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/2661.

Woolfolk, A.E., & Nicholich, L.M.. (1984). Educational psychology for teachers. (2nd ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10868