Dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran jarak jauh

Rodame Monitorir Napitupulu

doi:10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771

Dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran jarak jauh

Rodame Monitorir Napitupulu, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia

10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771

Abstract

Pandemi Covid-19 saat ini berdampak pada perguruan tinggi. IAIN Padangsidimpuan sebagai salah satu institusi pendidikan tinggi negeri keagamaan Islam di Indonesia dituntut untuk mengikuti perubahan metode pembelajaran yaitu pembelajaran jarak jauh (PJJ) yang semula sepenuhnya dilakukan dengan tatap muka. Letak kampus yang berada di Bagian Selatan Sumatera Utara dengan asal mahasiswa yang beragam dan berada jauh dari perkotaan menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi institusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis deskriptif. Jumlah informan 384 orang yang terdiri dari mahasiswa aktif Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam IAIN Padangsidimpuan yang dipilih secara acak. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa, meskipun mayoritas mahasiswa (95,8%) sudah memiliki perangkat untuk menjalani PJJ, namun di sisi lain mahasiswa merasa metode PJJ saat ini belum tepat karena mahasiswa merasa tidak dapat memantau perkembangan PJJ dengan mudah, tidak dapat memperoleh materi pembelajaran dengan mudah juga tidak dapat mempelajari materi dengan mudah. Secara keseluruhan, baik dari sisi teknologi maupun sisi dosen, mahasiswa tidak puas dengan metode PJJ yang dijalaninya saat ini dan juga merasa tidak puas dengan kemampuan dosen dalam menyampaikan materi pada PJJ.

Abstract

The Covid19 pandemic is currently affecting universities. IAIN Padangsidimpuan as one of the institutions of Islamic religious state higher education in Indonesia is required to follow the changes in learning methods, namely distance learning (PJJ), which is from the beginning is fully face-to-face. The location of the campus in the Southern Part of North Sumatra with diverse origins of students and being far from urban areas is a challenge for institutions. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis. The number of informants 384 people consisting of active students of the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business were randomly selected. Based on the results of the study note that, although the majority of students (95.8%) already have the tools to undergo Distance Learning, on the other hand students feel the distance learning method is currently not appropriate because students feel unable to monitor the development of distance learning easily, cannot obtain learning material easily nor can study material easily. Overall, both in terms of technology and the Lecturer side, students are not satisfied with the distance learning method they are currently undergoing and also feel dissatisfied with the ability of the Lecturer to deliver material to distance learning.

Keywords

Covid-19; pembelajaran jarak jauh; kepuasan teknologi; distance learning; satisfaction technology

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amado-Salvatierra, H. R., Hernández, R., & Hilera, J. R. (2012). Implementation of accessibility standards in the process of course design in virtual learning environments. Procedia Computer Science, 14, 363-370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.042

Aziz, A. L. (2013). Pengaruh kemudahan penggunaan terhadap kemanfaatan pada sikap pengguna e-learning survei pada mahasiswa jurusan Administrasi Bisnis, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya Malang Angkatan 2011. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 6(2), 1-7.

Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001

Deshwal, P., Trivedi, A., & Himanshi, H. L. N. (2017). Online learning experience scale validation and its impact on learners’ satisfaction. Procedia computer science, 112, 2455-2462. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.178

Farhan, W., Razmak, J., Demers, S., & Laflamme, S. (2019). E-learning systems versus instructional communication tools: Developing and testing a new e-learning user interface from the perspectives of teachers and students. Technology in Society, 59, 101192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101192

Granel, N., Leyva-Moral, J. M., Bernabeu-Tamayo, M. D., Gómez-Ibáñez, R., Watson, C. E., & Aguayo-González, M. P. (2019). Student satisfaction with content and language integrated learning in nursing education: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 21–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.011

Hew, K. F., Hu, X., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. Computers & Education, 145, 103724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103724

Isaac, O., Aldholay, A., Abdullah, Z., & Ramayah, T. (2019). Online learning usage within Yemeni higher education: The role of compatibility and task-technology fit as mediating variables in the IS success model. Computers & Education, 136, 113–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.012

Navimipour, N. J., & Zareie, B. (2015). A model for assessing the impact of e-learning systems on employees’ satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 475-485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.026

Jurkovič, V. (2019). Online informal learning of English through smartphones in Slovenia. System, 80, 27–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.007

Karwati, E. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran elektronik (e-learning) terhadap mutu belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 17(1), 41–54.

Kim, J. H., & Park, H. (2019). Effects of smartphone-based mobile learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Nursing Research, 13(1), 20–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.005

Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010

Latip, A. (2020). Peran literasi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi pada pembelajaran jarak jauh di masa pandemi Covid-19. EduTeach : Jurnal Edukasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 108–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.37859/eduteach.v1i2.1956

Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020). Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857

Nugroho, M. A., Setyorini, D., & Novitasari, B. T. (2019). The role of satisfaction on perceived value and e-learning usage continuity relationship. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 82–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.102

Nylund, H., & Lanz, M. (2020). Interactive learning activities for education of factory level order-to-delivery process. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 504–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.065

Pawirosumarto, S. (2016). Pengaruh kualitas sistem, kualitas informasi, dan kualitas layanan terhadap kepuasan pengguna sistem e-learning. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 6(3), 152864.

PENGUMUMAN RESMI Dari Mendikbud: 94% Siswa Belajar dari Rumah, 6% di Zona Hijau Boleh Tatap Muka. (2020, Juni 15). Liputan9. Retrieved from http://www.belajardirumah.org/2020/06/bundaterbaru-dari-mendikbud-94-siswa.html

Pereira, F. A. de M., Ramos, A. S. M., Gouvêa, M. A., & da Costa, M. F. (2015). Satisfaction and continuous use intention of e-learning service in Brazilian public organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 139–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.016

Rachman, M. M. (2012). Pengaruh kemampuan intelektual, pembelajaran individual dan internal locus of control terhadap kompetensi dan kinerja dosen (Studi Prodi Manajemen Terakreditasi B pada Universitas Swasta di Surabaya). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA), 22(1), 91-105.

Restrepo, E. G. y, Benavidez, C., & Gutiérrez, H. (2012). The challenge of teaching to create accessible learning objects to higher education lecturers. Procedia Computer Science, 14, 371–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.043

Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 333–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.074

Satuan Tugas Penanganan Covid-19. (2020). Infografis COVID-19 (18 Juni 2020). Retrieved from https://covid19.go.id/p/berita/infografis-covid-19-18-juni-2020

Seale, J., & Cooper, M. (2010). E-learning and accessibility: An exploration of the potential role of generic pedagogical tools. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1107–1116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.017

Shen, C., & Ho, J. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177

Tîrziu, A. M., & Vrabie, C. (2015). Education 2.0: E-learning methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 376-380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.213

Wang, C., Hsu, H.-C. K., Bonem, E. M., Moss, J. D., Yu, S., Nelson, D. B., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction: A comparative study of online and face-to-face learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 114–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.034

Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771