Iklim kelas di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 10 Ganting, Koto Tangah, Kota Padang

Hadiyanto Hadiyanto; M. Martini

doi:10.21831/amp.v6i1.17676

Iklim kelas di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 10 Ganting, Koto Tangah, Kota Padang

Hadiyanto Hadiyanto, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
M. Martini, SD Negeri 10 Ganting, Padang, Indonesia

10.21831/amp.v6i1.17676

Abstract

Penelitian kolaborasi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan membandingkan iklim kelas yang dialami (actual climate) dengan iklim kelas yang diinginkan (preferred climate) peserta didik di kelas IV, V dan VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri 10 Ganting, Kecamatan Koto Tangah Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat. Responden penelitian berjumlah 78 orang, masing-masing peserta didik di ketiga kelas tersebut merespon dua macam angket. Alat ukur iklim kelas actual form diadministrasikan terlebih dahulu untuk mengetahui iklim kelas yang dialami peserta didik, kemudian diikuti dengan alat ukur iklim kelas preferred form untuk mengukur iklim kelas yang diinginkan peserta didik. Setelah data yang terkumpul diolah dan dianalisis maka dapat diketahui bahwa beberapa skala iklim kelas yang dialami (actual climate) peserta didik kelas IV, V dan VI SD 10 Ganting tidak jauh berbeda dengan iklim kelas diinginkan (preferred climate). Namun demikian, skala cohesiveness dan satisfaction pada preferred climate di kelas V lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan yang dialami peserta didik (actual climate). Untuk itu, diperlukan langkah-langkah treatment untuk meningkatkan kedua skala tersebut agar iklim kelas sesuai dengan yang diinginkan peserta didik.

Kata kunci: iklim kelas, sekolah dasar, keakraban, kepuasan, demokrasi, kecepatan, kesulitan, formalitas

CLASSROOM CLIMATE AT PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 10 GANTING, KOTO TANGAH, KOTA PADANG

Abstract

This collaborative study aims to determine and compare the climate of the class experienced (actual climate) with the desired class climate (preferred climate) by students in class IV, V and VI at Public Elementary School Number 10, Sub-District Koto Tangah Padang, West Sumatra. Research respondents were 78 people, each student in the three classes responded to two kinds of questionnaires. The actual form of classroom climate instrument was administered first to know class climate experienced by students, then followed by preferred form of classroom climate instrument to measure climate of class desired by students. After the collected data were processed and analyzed it can be seen that some actual classroom climate of class IV, V and VI of Public Elementary School No. 10 Ganting are not much different from the preferred climate. Nevertheless, the scale of cohesiveness and satisfaction in preferred climate in class V is higher than that actual climate. Therefore, treatment steps are needed to improve both scales so that the classroom climate in accordance with the desired students.

Keywords: class climate, elementary school, familiarity, satisfaction, democracy, speed, difficulty, formality

Keywords

iklim kelas; sekolah dasar; keakraban; kepuasan; demokrasi; kecepatan; kesulitan; formalitas

Full Text:

PDF

References

Falsario. (2014). Classroom climate and academic performance of education Students’. De La Salle University: Manila.

Fisher, D. L. (1990). The assessment and change of classroom and School environment. Launceston.

Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1982). Use of classroom environment scale in investigating relationship between achievement and environment. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 5(2), 5–9.

Fisher, D. L., & Nair, C. S. (n.d.). Students’ perceptions of tertiary science classroom environments. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, XXIV(1), 50–66.

Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.

Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1983). Use of actual and preferred classroom environment scales in person environment fit research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 303–313.

Fraser, B. J., Seddon, T., & Eagleson, J. (1982). “Use of student perceptions in facilitating improvement in classroom environment.” The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 7(1), 31–42.

Hadiyanto. (2004). Mencari sosok desentralisasi manajemen pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hadiyanto. (2016). Teori dan pengembangan iklim kelas dan iklim sekolah. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hadiyanto, & Kumaidi. (1998). Pengembangan dan pemvalidasian alat ukur iklim kelas di sekolah lanjutan tingkat pertama. Padang: IKIP Padang.

Hadiyanto, & Mukti, B. (1997). Pengembangan dan Validasi Alat Ukur Iklim Kelas Sekolah Dasar. Padang: IKIP Padang.

Hyman, R. T. (1980). School administrator’s handbook of teacher supervision and evaluation methods. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Info-Tasikmalaya. (2017). Ribuan guru gagal naik pangkat karena plagiat. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://adstasik.blogspot.co.id/2015/08/guru-gagal-naik-pangkat.html

JPP. (2017). Mendikbud ingatkan Guru tidak lakukan plagiat. Retrieved April 1, 2017, from http://jpp.go.id/teknologi/ pendidikan/304439-mendikbud-ingatkan-guru-tidak-lakukan-plagiat

Khine, M. S. (2001). Investigation of tertiary classroom learning environment in Singapore. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. Washington: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Muhammad, A., Hadiyanto, & Nurli. (1998). No Title. Padang.

Sutjipto, & Hadiyanto. (2003). Upaya kepala sekolah dalam menciptakan iklim sekolah dasar di Jakarta. Jakarta.

Tarmidzi. (2006). Iklim Kelas dan Prestasi Belajar. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Wahyuningrum. (2008). Hubungan kemampuan, kepuasan dan disiplin kerja dengan kinerja pegawai di Kecamatan Tanggungharjo Kabupaten Grobogan. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Zedan, R. (2010). New Dimensions in the Classroom Climate. Learning Environment, (13), 75–88.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v6i1.17676