Deep learning in high schools: exploring pedagogical approaches for transformative education
Abstract
In today's ever-changing education landscape, fostering deep learning is paramount for transformative education. Teachers play a pivotal role in this endeavor by implementing effective pedagogies that guide students beyond surface-level understanding toward profound learning experiences. This study aimed to explore the effective pedagogical approaches used in schools to promote deep learning within a transformative educational setting. Adopting a qualitative approach with a case study design, the study focused on a single school to investigate these approaches. The study population comprised teachers and learners, with a purposive sample of eight participants, including four teachers and four learners. Data collection utilized semi-structured interviews with predetermined questions for the participants. Thematic analysis was employed to systematically distill meaningful themes and patterns from the collected data. The findings indicated that pedagogical approaches significantly contribute to both deep learning and transformative education, emphasizing active student participation. As a result, schools should adopt effective pedagogical approaches such as group discussions, presentations, and projects to enhance students’ learning experiences. The study therefore recommends that learner-centred pedagogies, teaching methods and strategies should be used in schools to foster deep learning of learners.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education, 34(3), 243-257.
Akpan, V. I., Igwe, U. A., Mpamah, I. B., & Okoro, C. O. (2020). Social constructivism: Implications on teaching and learning. British Journal of Education, 8(8), 49-56.
Alharahsheh , H. H., & Pius, A. (2019). A review of key paradigms: Positivism vs interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43.
Arbeiter, J., & Bucar, M. (2020). Transformative education: bridging education for change. Bridge 47, 4-25.
Arslan, E. (2022). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 395-407.
Baumgartner, L. M. (2019). Fostering transformative learning in educational settings. Adult Literacy, 69-74.
Blackwell, G. Y. (2018). Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory. Nurse Researcher, 1-22.
Blake, J., Sterling, S., & Goodson, I. (2018). Transformative learning for a sustainable future: An exploration of pedagogies for change at an alternative college. Open Acess, Sustainability, 5(1), 5347-5372.
Casteel, A., & Bridier, N. L. (2021). Describing populations and samples in doctoral students research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16(1), 339-362.
Channa, W. M., & Sahito, Z. (2022). Pedagogical competencies of teachers and the achievement of students: Explorations of best through a literature review. Webology, 19(3), 2928-2943.
Colomer , J., Serra, T., Canabate, D., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. Sustainability MDPI, 12(1), 1-12.
Deeba, F. (2021). Social constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning environment. Parennial Journal of History, 2(2), 403-421.
du Plessis, P., & Mestry, R. (2019). Teachers for rural schools: A challenge for South Africa. South African, 39(1), 1-19.
Effendi, Y. R. (2023). Strategy for the principals transformational leadership approach in strengthening the character of Indonesian students. Pedagogika/Pedagoy, 151(3), 5-33.
Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagoy: Technology dichotomy. Post Digital Science and Education, 4(1), 711-728.
Herodotou, C., Sharples, M., Gaved, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Scanion, E., & Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovative pedagogies of the future: An evidence based selection. Frontiers in Education, 4(113), 1-14.
Howard, P., O'Brien, C., & O'Rourke, K. (2019). Leading educational change in the 21st century: Creating living schools through shared vision and transformative governance. Sustainability MDPI, 1-13.
Jnanathapaswi, S. G. (2021). Thematic analysis & coding: An overview of the qualitative paradigm. An Introduction to Social Science Research, 1-11.
Jones, H., Bandayopadhyay, A., Kennedy, N., & Brophy, S. (2023). Investigating methods of sharing data between police, health, education and social services: Semi structured interviews with police service areas in Wales. Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Princiopls, 0(0), 1-11.
Kadaruddin, S. (2023). Empowering education through generative AI: Innovative instructional strategies for tommorrows learners. International Journal of Business, Law and Education, 4(2), 618-625.
Kampira, A. (2021). A brief introduction to thematic analysis. Alfregarde Research, 1-15.
Khedkar, P. D., & Nair, P. (2018). Transformative pedagogy: A paradigm shift in higher education. 3rf International Conference on Mulitdisciplinary Researcgh & Practice, IV(I), 332-337.
Liu, C. H., & Mathews, R. (2005). Vygotskys philosophy: Constructivism and its criticims examined. International Educational Journal, 6(3), 386-399.
Luitel, B. C., Dahal, N., & Pant, B. P. (2022). Critical pedagogy: Future and hope. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 3(1), 1-8.
Luna, D., Pineda-Alfonso, J. A., & Garcia-Perez, F. F. (2023). Self reflection in teaching: Considerations on the transformative potential of autoethnography. Pedagogika/Pedagogy, 151(3), 34-51.
Majid, U. (2018). Research fundamentals: Study design, population, and sample size. Undergraduate Research in Natual Clinical Science and Techn ology Journal, 1-7.
Maroun, W. (2018). Exploring the present state of South African: Challenges and recommendations. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(2), 192-214.
Mdodana-Zide, L. (2023). Teachers pedagogical strategies in under resourced rural schools in South Africa. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS), 4(1), 20-31.
Merzel, C. R. (2023). Pedagogy for transformative teaching and learning pedagogy in health promotion. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(4), 231-233.
Mouton, N., Louw, G. P., & Strydom, G. (2018). Critical challenges of the South African school system. Internationa, 12(1), 31-44.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step by step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22(1), 1-18.
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. T. (2023). Ethical principals for artifical intelligence in education. Educational and Information Techniques, 28(10), 4221-4241.
O'Donovan, M. (2020). A review of research in new pedagogies for deep learning. Centre of Teaching Development and Digital Media Aarhus University, 1-17.
Phellas, C. N., & Seale, C. (2017). Structured methods: Interviews, questionaire and observation. Doing Research, 1-202.
Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research. Key attributes and navigating the conundrums inits application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94-110.
Rani, K. (2023). Experiential learning in school education: Prospectss and challenges. International Journal of Advance and Applied Research, 10(2), 378-383.
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: Step by step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18(1), 1-13.
Rodel, S. S., & Karcher , M. (2020). Transformative education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical dimensions. Educational Theory, 70(5), 529-537.
Salonen, A. O. (2019). Transformative pedagogies for sustainable development. Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1-7.
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotskys Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional implications and teachers professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237-248.
Shrestha, D., & Khadka, A. (2022). The role of digital technologies in educatonal transformation. Digital Data Portal, 1-15.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). How to conduct an effective interview: A guide to interview design in research study. International Journal of Academic Research Management, 11(1), 39-51.
Thomas, A., Menon, A., Boruff, J., Rodriguez, A. M., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professional. A scoping review, 9(54), 1-20.
Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dawey, Piaget and Mpntessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195-212.
Vale, P., & Graven, M. (2022). Strategies implemented by South African teachers to ensure continuing mathematics during COVID-19. ZDM-Mathematics Education , 55(1), 163-175.
Weng, C., Chen, C., & Ai, X. (2022). A pedagogical study on promoting students deep learning through design based learning. International, 1653-1674.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v24i2.71350
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nana Yaw Brenya Agyeman
Supervised by
Our Journal has been Indexed by
Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/humanika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.