Depth-social interaction between ethnic in the local culture of Minahasa

Darmawan Edi Winoto; Aksilas Dasfordate; Aldegonda Evangeline Pelealu; Yohanes Burdam; Almen Sulpedi Ramaino; Gamar Dasfordate

doi:10.21831/hsjpi.v10i1.54492

Depth-social interaction between ethnic in the local culture of Minahasa

Darmawan Edi Winoto, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Aksilas Dasfordate, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Aldegonda Evangeline Pelealu, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Yohanes Burdam, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Almen Sulpedi Ramaino, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Gamar Dasfordate, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia

10.21831/hsjpi.v10i1.54492

Abstract

Humans benefit greatly from culture, especially social interaction. Humans' social interaction development will influence connection patterns with the environment. The Minahasa ethnic groups' unity of life grew from the small setting, namely the nuclear and extended family, and subsequently into a village. The social structure based on this relationship type is more inherited. This article explains the Minahasa culture, specifically interaction patterns. The method used is qualitative. Data collection used detailed observation, interviews, and studies bibliography. They use content analysis on reports and examination results from various events in the research area, especially regarding cooperation. The data collected were analyzed qualitatively. Research results show that relationships between family members by genetics or ethnicity are generally close ties. Kinship based on marriage is influential in social life. The market has cooperativeness, friendship, kinship, and patron-client service. In collaboration, the Minahasa and Sanger Talaud ethics are better than the Gorontalo ethics. Ethnic Minahasa and Sangir Talaud have developed many ideas to form harmonious activities between fellow citizens. Cooperation between people from different cultures in Minahasa is quite good in religion. The relationship between religious communities in Minahasa is the mutual respect in their respective worship.

Keywords

Cooperation; ethnicity; social interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbsaian-Hosseini, S. A., Liu, M., & Hsiang, S. M. (2019). Social network analysis for construction crews. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1389642

Baghdasaryan, M. (2017). The practice of political rights and patron–client relations: A case study of a party in Armenia. Citizenship Studies, 21(8), 1034–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1380603

Balick, A. (2023). Social media, identity, and careful culture: How online social networks limit identity, amplify difference, and diminish social cohesion. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 43(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2160190

Bania, T. A., Antoniou, A.-S., Theodoritsi, M., Theodoritsi, I., Charitaki, G., & Billis, E. (2021). The interaction with disabled persons scale: Translation and cross-cultural validation into Greek. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(7), 988–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1643420

Boussada, H., Prigent, J.-L., & Soumare, I. (2023). On the sovereign debt crisis: Sovereign credit default swaps and their interaction with stock market indices. Applied Economics, 55(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1934392

Cantabene, C., & Grassi, I. (2022). Firm performance and R&D cooperation: what matters? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2022.2145559

Colvin, C., Volet, S., & Fozdar, F. (2014). Local university students and intercultural interactions: Conceptualising culture, seeing diversity and experiencing interactions. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841642

Crowell, C., Mora-Guiard, J., & Pares, N. (2018). Impact of interaction paradigms on full-body interaction collocated experiences for promoting social initiation and collaboration. Human–Computer Interaction, 33(5–6), 422–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1374185

D’Arco, M., Marino, V., & Resciniti, R. (2023). Exploring the pro-environmental behavioral intention of Generation Z in the tourism context: The role of injunctive social norms and personal norms. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2171049

de Jong, E. B. P., Knippenberg, L., & Bakker, L. (2017). New frontiers: An enriched perspective on extraction frontiers in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1333267

Dell’Aguzzo, L., & Diodato, E. (2023). Patron-client state relations and the geopolitics of authoritarian survival and breakdown: Evidence from the MENA countries. Contemporary Politics, 29(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2022.2069068

Diprose, R., & Azca, M. N. (2020). Conflict management in Indonesia’s post-authoritarian democracy: Resource contestation, power dynamics and brokerage. Conflict, Security & Development, 20(1), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705074

Fang, D., & Wu, H. (2013). Development of a Safety Culture Interaction (SCI) model for construction projects. Safety Science, 57, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.003

Gehl, R. W., & Zulli, D. (2022). The digital covenant: Non-centralized platform governance on the mastodon social network. Information, Communication & Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147400

Grossi, E., Tavano Blessi, G., Sacco, P. L., & Buscema, M. (2012). The interaction between culture, health and psychological well-being: Data mining from the Italian culture and well-being project. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9254-x

Hasan, A. B. P., & Suwarni, E. (2012). Policies and practices for promoting multicultural awareness of indigenous early childhood education in Indonesia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 6(1), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/2288-6729-6-1-63

Herschell, A. D., Calzada, E. J., Eyberg, S. M., & McNeil, C. B. (2002). Parent-child interaction therapy: New directions in research. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1077-7229(02)80034-7

Horn, M. S. (2018). Tangible interaction and cultural forms: Supporting learning in informal environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(4), 632–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1468259

Ingman, B. C. (2021). Cultural interchange in adventure education: Exploring the interaction of participants and institutional cultures. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1697714

Jacobsen, M. (2002). On the question of contemporary identity in Minahasa, North Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Asian Anthropology, 1(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2002.10552520

Kafetsios, K., Hess, U., & Nezlek, J. B. (2018). Self-construal, affective valence of the encounter, and quality of social interactions: Within and cross-culture examination. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1305326

Keen, I. (2015). Culture, interaction and person reference in an Australian Language. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 16(3), 301–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2014.971690

Kolstø, P. (2021). Authoritarian diffusion, or the geopolitics of self-interest? Evidence from Russia’s patron–client relations with Eurasia’s De Facto States. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(5), 890–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1806209

Latta, G. F. (2020). Modelling the interaction of leadership, culture and power in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1188–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1669770

Lee, C. A., & Lee, S. K. (2022). Combining social network analysis and geographic information system for communication research: An application to immigrant communities. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2123085. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2123085

Li, S., He, X., & Chen, J. (2022). Exploring the relationship between interaction patterns and social capital accumulation in connectivist learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2157839

Maheshwari, R., & Kapoor, V. (2022). Investigating the impact of global market trends and market interaction on the Indian stock market through statistical time series modeling. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 25(7), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2022.2130562

Migliorini, L., & Rania, N. (2017). A qualitative method to “make visible” the world of intercultural relationships: The photovoice in social psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1263698

Mulumba, M. B. (2016). Enhancing the reading culture among language education graduate students through emerging technologies. Technology, Innovation and Education, 2(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40660-016-0014-4

Nguyen, A. K. T., & Ngoc, K. M. (2020). Building a conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility: An experience of qualitative approach in Vietnam. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 21(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2020.1709777

Nuyts, N., & Friese, C. (2023). Communicative patterns and social networks between scientists and technicians in a culture of care: discussing morality across a hierarchy of occupational spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 24(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1901976

Pantic, N., Brouwer, J., Thomas, L., & Froehlich, D. (2022). The potential of mixed-method social network analysis for studying interaction between agency and structure in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2094361

Richter, S., & Sabogal, L. C. B. (2023). Dynamics of peace or legacy of rebel governance? Patterns of cooperation between FARC-ex-combatants and conflict-affected communities in Colombia. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 34(1), 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2022.2117824

Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308602

Rumondor, A. C. F., Dhareshwar, S. S., & Kesisoglou, F. (2016). Amorphous solid dispersions or prodrugs: Complementary strategies to increase drug absorption. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 105(9), 2498–2508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2015.11.004

Tsang, A. (2022). Examining the relationship between language and cross-cultural encounters: Avenues for promoting intercultural interaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1725526

Wassmann, P., Schiller, D., & Thomsen, S. L. (2016). Spatial cooperation patterns and their impact on innovation outcomes: Lessons from firms in a low-technology region. European Planning Studies, 24(5), 833–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1140721

Widding, G. (2013). Practices in home–school cooperation – a gendered story? Teaching Education, 24(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2013.786896

Yadav, S. (2019). Socio-culturally induced distress among migrant labourers in India: A qualitative inquiry. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1563055

Yi, L. (2018). The concept of literature of the Republic of China in Chinese Modern Literary History Studies: A speech at Princeton University. Comparative Literature: East & West, 2(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2018.1482679

Yulian, H. D. (2015). Wawasan budaya nusantara menganalisis suku Minahasa. Institut Seni Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v10i1.54492