Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions of Mid-Semester Assessment of Mathematics in the Fifth-Grade Elementary School in Wates District Year 2021/2022

Wahyuning Arisa Dewi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sulis Fitri Lestari, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Attar Nazaruddin Mirza, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Risca Jayanti Ratmadiyah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This research aims to determine the quality of the multiple-choice test items for the Mid-Semester Assessment of Mathematics in the fifth-grade elementary school in Wates District Year 2021/2022. The quality of the items in terms of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discriminating power. This study was qualitative research. The subject in this research was a teacher and 84 students in fifth-grade elementary school students in Wates District Year 2021/2022. Data was collected by documentation method. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25. The data analysis technique used the difficulty index analysis technique, discriminating power, validity test, and reliability test. The results show (1) Quality items based on validity and valid question amounted to about eight items or 100%; (2) Quality items based on reliability can be concluded that the test items were reliable, with a reliability rate of 0.7359; (3) Quality items based on the level of difficulty, items that were relatively difficult and the medium was 0 item and relatively easy items amounted to 8 items or 100%; (4) Quality items based on discriminating power, there was 1 item or 12,5% in the excellent category, three items or 37,5% in the good category, and four items or 50% in the poor category.

 

Keywords: analysis items, mathematics, mid-semester assessment

 

=====================================================

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas soal pilihan ganda Penilaian Tengah Semester Matematika pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri Wates Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Kualitas butir soal ditinjau dari validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah guru dan 84 siswa kelas V SD Wates Tahun 2021/2022. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan SPSS Versi 25. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis indeks kesukaran, daya pembeda, uji validitas, dan uji reliabilitas. Hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) Kualitas butir soal berdasarkan validitas, soal yang valid berjumlah 8 butir atau 100%; (2) Kualitas butir soal berdasarkan reliabilitasnya dapat disimpulkan butir soal tes reliabel, dengan tingkat reliabilitas 0,7359; (3) Kualitas butir soal berdasarkan tingkat kesukarannya, yaitu soal relatif sukar dan sedang adalah 0 dan soal relatif mudah berjumlah 8 butir atau 100%; (4) Kualitas item berdasarkan daya pembeda, terdapat 1 item atau 12,5% yang termasuk dalam kategori baik, 3 item atau 37,5% pada kategori cukup, dan 4 item atau 50% pada kategori kurang.

 

Kata kunci: 4 C’s, learning, critical thinking, creative thinking, sekolah dasar


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Z. (2011). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Teknik dan Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. (2012a). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2012b). Reliabilitas dan Validitas Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices.-, 336.

Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. Cambridge University Press.

Damayanti, S. A., Efendi, N., & Sartika, S. B. (2022). Validitas Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) Kelas VIII untuk Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Journal of Banua Science Education, 2(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbse.v2i2.70

Dewi, D. (2018). Modul Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Universitas Diponegoro, 1–14.

Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K. (2019). Analisis Kesukaran Soal, Daya Pembeda dan Fungsi Distraktor. Al-Manar, 8(2), 37–64.

Gregory, R. J. (2004). Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications. Allyn & Bacon.

Guildord, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1956). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. New York: McGraw-HillBookCompany.

Hariyanto, I. B. (2014). Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests.

Mahendra, E., & Rahayu, W. (2019). Analisis Butir Soal. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26498.71360

Malik, A., & Chusni, M. M. (2018). Pengantar Statistika Pendidikan: Teori dan Aplikasi. Deepubish.

Purnomo, Y. W., & Prananto, I. W. (2020). What is Needed and Prepared to Become a Mathematics Teacher? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 95–102.

Salamah, U. (2018). Penjaminan Mutu Penilaian Pendidikan. Journal Evaluasi, 2(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v2i1.79

Shakil, M. (2008). Assessing Student Performance Using Test Item Analysis and its Relevance to the State Exit Final Exams of MAT0024 Classes-An Action Research Project. A Paper Presented on MDC Conference Day.

Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Teacher Evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice (Vol. 41). Springer Science & Business Media.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293

Sudijono, A., & Pendidikan, P. E. (2011). Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Cet.

Sulistiawan, C. H. (2016). Kualitas Soal Ujian Sekolah Matematika Program IPA Dan Kontribusinya terhadap Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7516

Suprananto, K. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Susanto, H., Rinaldi, A., & Novalia, N. (2015). Analisis Validitas Reliabilitas Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Beda pada Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas XII IPS Di SMA Negeri 12 Bandar Lampung Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 203–218.

Waizah, N., & Herwani, H. (2021). Penilaian Pengetahuan Tertulis dalam Kurikulum 2013. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v2i2.54

Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1(2), 8.

Wilson, L. D. (2007). High-stakes Testing in Mathematics. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2, 1099–1110.

Zajda, J. (1997). Learning and Teaching. James Nicholas Publishers.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v5i1.46229

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v5i1.46229.g18001

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Wahyuning Arisa Dewi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DIDAKTIKA has been abstracted and indexed by

View Didaktika Stats