Attitude Stabilization of a Tricopter UAV Using Integral-Augmented Linear Quadratic Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jraee.v3i2.1295Keywords:
Tricopter, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Linear Quadratic Regulator, Integral Augmentation, Attitude StabilizationAbstract
Attitude stabilization of a tricopter unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is challenging because its asymmetric three-rotor configuration and servo-actuated rear rotor introduce coupled and disturbance-sensitive rotational dynamics. This study develops and experimentally evaluates an integral-augmented Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR-I) for roll, pitch, and yaw stabilization of a physical tricopter UAV. The controller was implemented on an embedded flight controller using inertial measurements from an MPU6050 and was evaluated through tuning-rig experiments and outdoor free-flight tests under measured wind disturbances. A conventional LQR was used as the baseline controller. To ensure a consistent comparison, the performance of both controllers was evaluated under the same measured wind speed of 4.4 m/s. Under this condition, LQR-I reduced pitch overshoot from 9.03° to 2.85° and yaw overshoot from 13.43° to 3.35°, corresponding to reductions of approximately 68.4% and 75.1%, respectively. Roll overshoot increased slightly from 5.25° to 5.47°. The magnitude of the steady-state error was reduced by approximately 56.6%, 16.6%, and 50.6% for the roll, pitch, and yaw axes, respectively. In addition, the root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 2.451° to 2.065° for roll, from 3.397° to 2.542° for pitch, and from 2.744° to 1.227° for yaw. These experimental results demonstrate that integral augmentation improves the overall disturbance-rejection and attitude-tracking performance of the tricopter, particularly in the pitch and yaw axes, although a slight increase in roll overshoot was observed.
Downloads
References
[1] A. Khalid, Z. Mushtaq, S. Arif, K. Zeb, M. A. Khan, and S. Bakshi, “Control schemes for quadrotor UAV: Taxonomy and survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, pp. 1–32, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3617652.
[2] M. Ramp and E. Papadopoulos, “On modeling and control of a holonomic tricopter,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 105, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10846-021-01541-9.
[3] D. Abara, P. Bhowmick, and A. Lanzon, “A negative imaginary robust formation control scheme for networked multi-tilt tricopters utilizing an inner-loop sliding-mode control technique,” Automatica, vol. 169, Art. no. 111813, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111813.
[4] M. Rinaldi, S. Primatesta, and G. Guglieri, “A comparative study for control of quadrotor UAVs,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 6, Art. no. 3464, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13063464.
[5] M. Okasha, J. Kralev, and M. Islam, “Design and experimental comparison of PID, LQR and MPC stabilizing controllers for Parrot Mambo mini-drone,” Aerospace, vol. 9, no. 6, Art. no. 298, 2022, doi: 10.3390/aerospace9060298.
[6] G. Godínez-Garrido, O. Santos-Sánchez, H. Romero-Trejo, and O. García-Pérez, “Discrete integral optimal controller for quadrotor attitude stabilization: Experimental results,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, Art. no. 9293, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13169293.
[7] S. M. Ahmad and S. Fareed, “Attitude modelling and real-time robust control of a 3-DoF quadcopter UAV test bench,” The Aeronautical Journal, 2024, doi: 10.1017/aer.2024.11.
[8] O. A. Dhewa and A. Nasuha, “Enhancement of stability on autonomous waypoint mission of quadrotor using LQR integrator control,” IIUM Engineering Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 129–158, 2022, doi: 10.31436/iiumej.v23i1.1803.
[9] O. A. Dhewa, F. Arifin, A. S. Priyambodo, A. Winursito, and Y. M. Mustafa, “Attitude UAV stability control using Linear Quadratic Regulator-Neural Network (LQR-NN),” IIUM Engineering Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 246–265, 2024, doi: 10.31436/iiumej.v25i2.3119.
[10] A. S. Elkhatem and S. N. Engin, “Robust LQR and LQR-PI control strategies based on adaptive weighting matrix selection for a UAV position and attitude tracking control,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 6275–6292, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.057.





