PENALARAN DALAM TUTURAN LISAN GURU PADA PEMBELAJARAN DI SMP KOTA MALANG
Downloads
This study aims to describe reasoning patterns and strategies in teachers' language
in learning at junior high schools (JHSs) in Malang City. The study used the qualitative
phenomenological approach. The subjects were teachers of the Indonesian language,
Science, Mathematics, and Social Studies in two public JHSs and two private JHSs in
Malang City. The data were collected through observations supported by video recording
devices. The results of the study are as follows. First, the reasoning patterns in teachers'
language in learning consist of: (1) Topic + Comment and Comment + Topic patterns in
the sentence level; (2) (a) Main Idea (MI) + Supporting Materials (SM), (b) SM + MI, (c)
SM + MI + Further Supporting Materials (FSM), and (d) SM + Implied Main Idea (IMI)
in the fragment level; and (3) (a) MI + SM, (b) SM + MI + SM + MI, (c) SM + MI + SM + MI
+ SM, and (d) MI + SM + MI in the discourse level. Second, the reasoning strategies in
teachers' language in learninginclude: (1) deductive strategies with examples, both direct
and analoguos ones; (2) inductive strategies; and (3) mixed (convergent) strategies.
Keywords: reasoning, teachers' language, learning, construction
Ardianto. 2015. "Struktur Argumen Da-
lam Wacana Karya Tulis Ilmiah Mahasiswa"
dalam
Jurnal
Penelitian
Bahasa,
Sastra,
dan Pengajarannya Volume 14
Nomor 1 edisi April 2015.
Brown, Gillian and Yule, G. 1996. Discourse
Analysis.
London:Cambridge
University Press.
Borman, E G and Borman, N.C. 1989.
Retorika-Suatu Pendekatan Terpadu.
Terjemahan. Jakarta:Erlanga.
Cummings, L. 1999. Pragmatics A Multidiciplinary
Perspective.
New
York:
Oxford
University Press.
LITERA, Volume 16, Nomor 1, April 2017
Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to
Functional Grammar. London: Edward
Arnold, Ltd. Halliday, M.A.K. and
Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English.
London: Longman.
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundation in Sociolinguistic-An
Ethnographic
Approach.
Philadelphia:
The
University
of
Pennsylvania
Press.
Inc.
Keraf, G. 1979. Tatabahasa Indonesia. EndeFlores:
Nusa Indah. Keraf, G. 1984.
Komposisi.Ende Flores: Nusa Indah.
Keraf, G. 1985. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta:
Penerbit
PT
Gramedia.
Keraf,
G.
Argumentasi
dan
Narasi.
Jakarta:
Penerbit
PT Gramedia
Kementrian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan
Nasional. 2013. Modul Pelatihan
Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta:
Kemdiknas.
Leech, G. 1983. Principle of Pragmatik. London
and New York:
Longman.
Mujianto. 1998. Retorika Wacana Orasi
Ilmiah. (Disertasi tidak Dipublikasikan).
Malang: IKIP Malang.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Republik
Indonesia.
Nomor
Tahun
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Republik
Indonesia.
Nomor
Tahun
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Republik Indonesia. Nomor
Tahun 2014.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
nasional
Nomor
Tahun
tentang
Standar Proses Pendidikan
Nasional. Jakarta: Kemdiknas.
Poespoprodjo, W dan Gilarso, T. 1987.
Logika Ilmu Menalar. Bandung:Penerbit
Remaja Karya.
Rymes, B. 2008. Classroom Discourse
Analysis: A Tool for Critical Reflection.
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Senduk, A.G. 2009. "Pengembangan Pola
Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Pembe-
lajaran Bahasa Indonesia yang Kon-
struktivistik di SMP Kota Tondano.
