The Effect of GIR on Motivation, Vocabulary Mastery, and Reading Comprehension Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/lingped.v2i1.23754Abstract
This research aims to: (1) describe the effect of GIR as a part of extensive reading; (2) compare the effectiveness between GIR and conventional learning; and (3) compare the effectiveness between GIR variation 1 and 2 on motivation, vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension ability. The data were analyzed using: (1) the one sample t-test to investigate the effect of GIR; (2) the Helmert Contrast to investigate the difference in the effectiveness of GIR as well as the conventional technique; (3) the post-hoc test involving the Tukey to analyze which was more effective between GIR and conventional technique in students' motivation, vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension ability. The results of the study show that: (1) GIR has a significant effect on all dependent variables; (2) GIR is more effective than the control group in improving all dependent variables, except GIR variation 1 in reading comprehension ability has equal effect with conventional technique; (3) there is no difference in the effectiveness of GIR variation 1 and 2 in terms of improving students' motivation, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension skills.
Key words: GIR, extensive reading, motivation, vocabulary knowledge, reading comprehension abilityReferences
¬¬¬¬Alderson, C. J., (2001). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bamford, J. (1984). Extensive reading by means of graded readers. Reading in a Foreign Language Volume 2, No 2, Autumn 1984, pp 218-260.
Dorn, L. J. & Soffos, C.. (2005). Teaching for deep comprehension a reading workshop approach. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
Duffy, G. G. (2009). Explaining reading: a resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies.2nd.ed.New York: The Guildford Press.
Hirabe, R. d. B. & Feryok, A., (2013) A model of motivation for extensive reading in Japanese as a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language. April 2013 Volume 25. No.1, 72-93.
Prior, J. O., (2006). Nonfiction comprehension test practice. Huntington Beach: Shell Education.
Shanahan, T. (2006). The national reading panel report: practical advice for teachers. Naperville: Learning Point Associates.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.