Addition of Alkali Activator and Substitution of GGBFS in Hydraulic Cement for High Early Flexural Strength and High Slump Concrete

Authors

  • Maria Apolonia Palan Keron Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Iman Satyarno
  • Suprapto Siswosukarto
  • Ratna Dwiyani Nawangsasi PT. Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk, Bogor, 16820, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Hasan Taufiq PT. Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk, Bogor, 16820, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v22i1.87888

Keywords:

Cement, GGBFS, Alkali Activator, Flexural Strength, Concrete

Abstract

To lower CO2 emissions, the construction sector is increasingly adopting sustainable practices, such as cutting back on clinker usage in cement manufacturing. Hydraulic cement is an environmentally friendly cement material because it uses a smaller amount of clinker. The amount of industrial waste, including materials like Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), keeps rising each year. Because of this, it is frequently used as an alternative to cement. However, concrete with GGBFS substitution generally experiences a delay in early strength development due to its low reactivity to water. To overcome this, adding an alkali activator in NaOH and Na2SiO3 is necessary. In this study, the dosage of alkali activator was varied at 0%, 2.5%, 5% and 7.5% by weight of GGBFS with R and A values set at 1.5 and 0.45. In addition, using GGBFS can also reduce the workability of concrete, so it is necessary to use a superplasticizer in the form of Sika® Viscocrete®-1050 to improve concrete flow properties. The dosage of superplasticizer used was 0.75% by weight with a target slump of 20 cm for ease of working. The amount of GGBFS used was 30% by weight. To evaluate the materials performance, test were carried out to measure the concrete workability, compressive strength of paste and concrete flexural strength after 3 days of curing. The results show that increasing the dosage of alkali activator can increase the paste compressive strength by more than 24 MPa according to the requirements of using hydraulic cement and concrete flexural strength by more than 3 MPa in 3 days. Concrete with a 7.5% alkali activator dosage can achieve a concrete flexural strength of 4.81 MPa at 3 days and has a slump value of 20 cm. This research can be a solution to reduce CO2 emissions and is useful for construction projects that require high flexural strength values at early ages and high slump.

References

[1] A. Minhajuddin and A. Saha, “Performance evaluation of geopolymer concrete with waste granite powder as a sustainable alternative to sand,” J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng., vol. 20, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40712-025-00227-6.

[2] A. L. Almutairi, B. A. Tayeh, A. Adesina, H. F. Isleem, and A. M. Zeyad, “Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 15, no. September, p. e00733, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733.

[3] A. R. Mazumdar, “Journal of Thailand Concrete Association HYDRAULIC CEMENT ( TIS 2594 ) AND ORDINARY PORTLAND,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021.

[4] C. ASTM, “iTeh Standards iTeh Standards,” Des. E 778 – 87 (Reapproved 2004), vol. i, no. Reapproved, pp. 3–5, 2018, doi: 10.1520/C1157.

[5] A. A. Adam, “The Effects of Water to Solid Ratio, Activator to Binder Ratio, and Lime Proportion on the Compressive Strength of Ambient-Cured Geopolymer Concrete,” J. Civ. Eng. Forum, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 161, 2019, doi: 10.22146/jcef.43878.

[6] W. Petchgate, S. Pongsivasathit, J. Tangpagasit, S. Piyaphipat, K. Pinpatthanapong, and P. Thongindam, “Case Studies in Construction Materials Sustainable soil stabilization : Evaluating the feasibility of hydraulic cement in the deep mixing method,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 22, no. September 2024, p. e04394, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04394.

[7] T. Proske, S. Hainer, M. Rezvani, and C. Graubner, “Cement and Concrete Research Eco-friendly concretes with reduced water and cement contents — Mix design principles and laboratory tests,” vol. 51, pp. 38–46, 2013.

[8] V. Johnpaul, N. Balasundaram, and M. Natarajan, “Environmental impact of dumping ggbfs on lands in Coimbatore,” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 332–334, 2019.

[9] Y. Esen and E. Orhan, “Investigation of the effect on the physical and mechanical properties of the dosage of additive in self-consolidating concrete,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2849–2858, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0258-2.

[10] J. Pradhan, S. Panda, R. Kumar Mandal, and S. Kumar Panigrahi, “Influence of GGBFS-based blended precursor on fresh properties of self-compacting geopolymer concrete under ambient temperature,” Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.338.

[11] J. Pradhan, S. Panda, S. Dwibedy, P. Pradhan, and S. K. Panigrahi, “Production of durable high-strength self-compacting geopolymer concrete with GGBFS as a precursor,” J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 529–551, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10163-023-01851-0.

[12] A. I. Ruiz, M. A. de la Rubia, J. Massana, F. Alonso Peralta, A. Moragues, and E. Reyes, “Sustainable low-cement blends featuring blast furnace slag, metakaolin and nanosilica show remarkable long-term durability against chlorides for one day curing age,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 22, no. March, p. e04511, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04511.

[13] P. Nath and P. K. Sarker, “Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 66, pp. 163–171, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080.

[14] Z. Qu, Z. Liu, R. Si, and Y. Zhang, “Effect of Various Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Content on Concrete Properties: Experiments and Modelling,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15093016.

[15] D. A. F. Hashmi, M.S. Khan, M. Bilal, M. Shariq, and A. Baqi, “Green Concrete: An Eco-Friendly Alternative to the OPC Concrete,” Construction, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 2022, doi: 10.15282/construction.v2i2.8710.

[16] N. Puspita, Y. Arti, and Febryandi, “Flexural Strength Analysis of Concrete With the Addition B3 Waste as an Additive to Ordinary Portland Cement,” Proc. 4th Forum Res. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, pp. 343–348, 2021, doi: 10.2991/ahe.k.210205.057.

[17] B. Lothenbach, K. Scrivener, and R. D. Hooton, “Supplementary cementitious materials,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1244–1256, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001.

[18] R. Prakash, S. Srividhya, P. Neelamegam, K. Mukilan, R. Premkumar, and M. V. Kumar, “Fresh and hardened characteristics of a novel alkali-activated geopolymer concrete with GGBFS,” Mater. Prot., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 294–306, 2024, doi: 10.62638/ZasMat1121.

[19] R. Cornelis, H. Priyosulityo, I. Satyarno, Rochmadi, and I. Rustendi, “Effect of the Mortar Volume Ratio on the Mechanical Behavior of Class CI Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1920–1935, 2022, doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-09-012.

[20] S. Zhang and D. Niu, “Hydration and mechanical properties of cement-steel slag system incorporating different activators,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 363, no. January 2022, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129981.

[21] G. S. Ryu, Y. B. Lee, K. T. Koh, and Y. S. Chung, “The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 47, no. 2013, pp. 409–418, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.069.

[22] Hanani, “Mix Design of Ambient Cured Geopolymer Concrete with Fly Ash , GGBFS , and Borax,” vol. 20, no. 2, 2024.

[23] H. Zhang, H. Li, H. Guo, Y. Li, and L. Wei, “Mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer cement mortar for non vibratory compacted trench backfilling,” pp. 1–15, 2025.

[24] M. Li and V. C. Li, “High-early-strength engineered cementitious composites for fast, durable concrete repair-material properties,” ACI Mater. J., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2011, doi: 10.14359/51664210.

[25] F. Hussain, I. Kaur, and A. Hussain, “Reviewing the influence of GGBFS on concrete properties,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 32, pp. 997–1004, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.410.

[26] P. D. Sheet, “Sika ® ViscoCrete ® -1050 HE,” no. November, pp. 1–3, 2017.

[27] R. Cornelis, H. Priyosulistyo, I. Satyarno, and Rochmadi, “The Investigation on Setting Time and Strength of High Calcium Fly Ash Based Geopolymer,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 881, pp. 158–164, 2018, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.881.158.

[28] ASTM C 136, “SNI ASTM C136:2012. Metode uji untuk analisis saringan agregat halus dan agregat kasar,” Badan Stand. Nas., pp. 1–24, 2012.

[29] I. Satyarno, A. P. Solehudina, C. Meyartoa, D. Hadiyatmokoa, P. Muhammada, and R. Afnana, “Practical method for mix design of cement-based grout,” Procedia Eng., vol. 95, no. Scescm, pp. 356–365, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.194.

[30] SNI-1972, “Cara Uji Slump Beton,” 2008.

[31] B. S. N. SNI 4431, “SNI 4431-2011 Cara Uji Kuat Lentur Beton Normal dengan Dua Titik Pembebanan,” Badan Standar Nas. Indones., pp. 1–16, 2011.

[32] C. Lee, S. Lee, and N. Nguyen, “Modeling of Compressive Strength Development of High-Early-Strength-Concrete at Different Curing Temperatures,” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 205–219, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40069-016-0147-6.

[33] E. Anggarini and D. P. Hardiani, “Comparison of Addition of Sika-Viscocrete 1050 He and Sika-Visco Flow for High Strength Concrete SCC Fc’45 Mpa (Case Study: Replacement of Sei. Alalak Bridge),” Eng. Appl. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2023, 2023.

[34] J. Vincent, B. Natarajan, D. Das Amaladas, and D. Cruze, “An Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Nano GGBFS in Concrete with Statistical Validation,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 12, 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13123060.

[35] M. I. Khan, V. V. Ram, and V. I. Patel, “Strength, Environmental Impact and Cost Assessment of Alkali-Activated Concrete with Pre-treated Coarse Recycled Aggregates,” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., vol. 19, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40069-025-00768-2.

[36] S. Chen and S. Wang, “Effect of activator dosage and mass ratio of GGBFS to FA on 3D printing performance of kenaf geopolymer,” pp. 0–17, 2024.

[37] G. Fahim Huseien, J. Mirza, M. Ismail, S. K. Ghoshal, and A. Abdulameer Hussein, “Geopolymer mortars as sustainable repair material: A comprehensive review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 80, no. April, pp. 54–74, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.076.

[38] I. Ismail, S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, R. San Nicolas, S. Hamdan, and J. S. J. Van Deventer, “Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 45, pp. 125–135, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.006.

[39] S. Sasui, G. Kim, J. Nam, T. Koyama, and S. Chansomsak, “Strength and microstructure of class-C fly ash and GGBS blend geopolymer activated in NaOH & NaOH + Na2SiO3,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma13010059.

[40] W. Chen and H. J. H. Brouwers, “The hydration of slag, part 1: Reaction models for alkali-activated slag,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 428–443, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0873-2.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Keron, M. A. P., Satyarno, I., Siswosukarto, S., Nawangsasi, R. D., & Taufiq, M. H. (2026). Addition of Alkali Activator and Substitution of GGBFS in Hydraulic Cement for High Early Flexural Strength and High Slump Concrete. INERSIA Lnformasi Dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik Sipil Dan Arsitektur, 22(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v22i1.87888

Issue

Section

Articles