Comparative Analysis on Structural Behaviour of Steel Structure Using Different Types of Bracing Due to Dynamic Earthquake Loads

Authors

  • Rosi Nursani Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya 46115, Indonesia
  • M Syarif Al Huseinny Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya 46115, Indonesia
  • Hidayanto Hidayanto Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya 46115, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v21i2.85479

Keywords:

steel structure, bracing, Dynamic Earthquake Loads, story drift, stiffness

Abstract

Earthquake-resistant steel structures must have adequate strength and serviceability to withstand and distribute seismic forces throughout the structure. The structure should not be too stiff or too ductile. High structural stiffness causes small deformations in the structure and affects the absorption of seismic energy. On the other hand, structures that are too flexible can cause deformations beyond the structural limits. One effective approach to enhance earthquake resistance in high-rise buildings is the incorporation of lateral bracing. This study outlines a numerical simulation of a five-story steel building, employing various bracing types using specialized software. The objective is to assess the structural behavior of the building both with and without bracing, specifically analyzing three configurations: V-bracing, inverted V-bracing, and two-story X-bracing. Key aspects of the structural behavior examined include natural periods, internal forces, inter-story drift, and overall stiffness. All models maintain consistent dimensions for structural elements, loading conditions, and the placement of bracing, positioned in the building's weak direction. A dynamic analysis was conducted utilizing the response spectrum method. The findings reveal that structures equipped with inverted V-bracing and two-story X-bracing exhibit superior performance compared to those with V-bracing, while the V-bracing still offers enhancements over structures lacking any bracing. 

References

[1] H. Saberi, V. Saberi, A. Sadeghi, A. Pooyasefat, and E. N. Farsangi, “Investigation of the occurrence of progressive collapse in high-rise steel buildings with different braced configurations,” Civ. Environ. Eng. Rep., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 33–54, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.2478/ceer-2021-0048.

[2] S. Al-Safi, I. Alameri, W. A. Wasel, and A. B. Al-Kadasi, “Linear and nonlinear behavior of steel buildings with different bracing systems,” Int. J. Steel Struct., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 475–486, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13296-020-00450-1.

[3] Y. U. Kulkarni, P. G. Chandak, M. K. Devtale, and S. S. Sayyed, “Analysis of various steel bracing systems using steel sections for high-rise structures,” Int. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. Appl. Sci., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 220–227, 2016.

[4] C. C. Manikanta, S. Elavenil, and V. Vasugi, “Dynamic analysis of tall building with cross, diagonal, V-type and inverted-V bracing,” in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022, pp. 727–737, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_62.

[5] B. C. Zega, P. N. Prasetyono, F. Nadiar, and A. Triarso, “Desain struktur bangunan baja tahan gempa menggunakan SNI 1729:2020,” Publ. Ris. Orientasi Tek. Sipil, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 108–113, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.26740/proteksi.v4n2.p108-113.

[6] S. Khattar and K. Muthumani, “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame with steel bracing system,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1029–1034, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.C4232.098319.

[7] M. Bouderradji, M. S. Dimia, S. Gherabli, A. R. Belakhdar, and N. Lahbari, “Seismic performance assessment of deficient RC structures retrofitted with different steel bracing systems,” J. Eng. Exact Sci., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 16884-01e, 2023, doi: 10.18540/jcecvl9iss9pp16884-01e.

[8] N. Bhojkar and M. Bagade, “Seismic evaluation of high-rise structure using steel bracing system,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 264–269, 2015. [Online]. Available: www.ijiset.com

[9] M. P. J. Barge and D. N. Shelke, “Comparative analysis between various types of bracings for steel buildings in seismic zones,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1974–1980, May 2022, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2022.42516.

[10] N. Ezzaki, D. Stoica, L. Rece, and A. Modrea, “Reducing the seismic vulnerability of RC buildings using steel bracing elements,” Rom. J. Transp. Infrastruct., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 2019, doi: 10.2478/rjti-2019-0005.

[11] K. Yusuf, F. Fasdarsyah, N. Usrina, M. Fauzan, and R. Nurahim, “Comparative study of strengthened steel structure behavior using bracing and shear wall,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–87, 2023, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v3i2.456.

[12] M. A. Kafi, A. Kheyroddin, and R. Omrani, “New steel divergent braced frame systems for strengthening of reinforced concrete frames,” Int. J. Eng. Trans. A, Basics, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1886–1896, 2020, doi: 10.5829/IJE.2020.33.10A.07.

[13] B. K. Bohara, K. H. Ganaie, and P. Saha, “Effect of position of steel bracing in L-shaped reinforced concrete buildings under lateral loading,” Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 155–177, 2022, doi: 10.17515/resm2021.295st0519.

[14] A. Mishra, “Comparative study of multistoried buildings with X and inverted V bracing,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2022, doi: 10.55041/ijsrem11995.

[15] S. Soelarso and B. Baehaki, “Analisis perbandingan simpangan horisontal (drift) pada struktur gedung tahan gempa menggunakan pengaku lateral (bracing),” Fondasi J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.36055/jft.v5i1.1244.

[16] F. Anastasia, A. M. E. Saputro, G. L. Goro, and D. B. Setiawan, “Performance assessment of structural bracing models for multi-story buildings,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 196–204, 2024, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.14.1.19397.

[17] M. C. S., “Seismic performance of RC buildings on sloping ground with different types of bracing systems,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 82–90, 2016, doi: 10.15623/ijret.2016.0502016.

[18] N. Patel and D. Koirala, “Linear and nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with V-shaped steel bracing,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.55041/ijsrem2603.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

How to Cite

Nursani, R., Al Huseinny, M. S., & Hidayanto, H. (2026). Comparative Analysis on Structural Behaviour of Steel Structure Using Different Types of Bracing Due to Dynamic Earthquake Loads. INERSIA Lnformasi Dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik Sipil Dan Arsitektur, 21(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v21i2.85479

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Rosi Nursani, M Syarif Al Huseinny, Hidayanto Hidayanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with INERSIA journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the INERSIA journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Lisensi Creative Commons
INERSIA by https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/inersia was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License