Operational Modal Analysis of a Box Girder Bridge using Fast Fourier Transform and Stochastic Subspace Identification

Authors

  • Muhammad Akbar Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Aminullah Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
  • Ali Awaludin Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v21i2.83380

Keywords:

SHMS, OMA, Fourier Transform (FFT) dan Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI)

Abstract

The A.P. Pettarani Flyover Bridge in Makassar serves as a critical infrastructure supporting community mobility and regional economic activities. With the increasing volume of traffic and the resulting structural loads, the implementation of a Structural Health Monitoring System (SHMS) becomes essential to ensure both the safety and maintenance efficiency of the bridge. This study aims to explore the application of Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) through the use of Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) methods to analyze the bridge's structural health by extracting natural frequencies and damping ratios from dynamic response data. Dynamic response data were obtained through permanently installed accelerometers, enabling continuous monitoring of the bridge’s vibrational behavior due to traffic loads and environmental influences. The FFT analysis effectively identified the dominant frequency at 3.92 Hz, consistent with the results from SSI analyses both SSI Data and SSI Covariance methods which also yielded a natural frequency of 3.92 Hz. Additionally, other frequencies were observed in the range of 9.80 Hz to 9.81 Hz, with corresponding damping ratios varying between 1% and 3%. The consistency in natural frequency results from both methods highlights the reliability of OMA in capturing the modal characteristics crucial for structural health assessment. Harnessing modern sensor technology and advanced spectral and subspace identification techniques, this monitoring system facilitates early detection of potential damage before it evolves into more significant issues. The practical implications of this research include enhancing maintenance strategies toward more targeted and sustainable bridge management. Furthermore, the success of this study provides a valuable reference model for the continual development of SHMS for other bridges throughout Indonesia, ultimately promoting road user safety and the longevity of national infrastructure.

References

[1] R. R. Zulkifli, A. Aminullah, and I. Satyarno, “Long-Term Health Monitoring Data Processing on Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Bridge by Wavelet-Based,” INERSIA lnformasi dan Ekspose Has. Ris. Tek. Sipil dan Arsit., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2023.

[2] O. S. Sonbul and M. Rashid, “Algorithms and Techniques for the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges: Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1–29, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23094230.

[3] R. El Dahr, X. Lignos, S. Papavieros, and I. Vayas, “Development and Validation of a LabVIEW Automated Software System for Displacement and Dynamic Modal Parameters Analysis Purposes,” Modelling, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 189–210, 2023, doi: 10.3390/modelling4020011.

[4] G. Park, D. You, K. Y. Oh, and W. Nam, “Natural Frequency Degradation Prediction for Offshore Wind Turbine Structures,” Machines, vol. 10, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.3390/machines10050356.

[5] A. Pirrotta and S. Russotto, “A new OMA method to perform structural dynamic identification: numerical and experimental investigation,” Acta Mech., vol. 234, no. 9, pp. 3737–3749, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00707-023-03558-7.

[6] D. P. Pasca, A. Aloisio, M. M. Rosso, and S. Sotiropoulos, “PyOMA and PyOMA_GUI: A Python module and software for Operational Modal Analysis,” SoftwareX, vol. 20, p. 101216, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101216.

[7] Arvin Fardipour, Norman Herl, Sarmad Waqas, and Mehdi Nodeh, “Advanced structural health monitoring and damage detection using inverse methods and perturbation stiff-ness matrix analysis,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 001–009, 2023, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.1.2002.

[8] S. Laflamme et al., “Roadmap on measurement technologies for next generation structural health monitoring systems,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 34, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/acd135.

[9] R. Brincker, L. Zhang, and P. Andersen, “Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 441–445, 2001, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303.

[10] Z. Cao and X. Fan, “A Heuristic Description of Fast Fourier Transform,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1110.5989, 2011.

[11] K. Loewke, D. Meyer, A. Starr, and S. Nemat-Nasser, “Structural health monitoring using FFT,” in Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, SPIE, 2005, pp. 931–935.

[12] Y. Lan, W. Lin, and Y. Zhang, “Bridge Frequency Identification Using Multiple Sensor Responses of an Ordinary Vehicle,” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., vol. 23, no. 05, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1142/S0219455423500566.

[13] P. Van Overschee and B. De Moor, “Continuous-time frequency domain subspace system identification,” Signal Processing, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0165-1684(96)00052-7.

[14] W. S. Ibrahim, A. Aminullah, A. Awaludin, B. Suhendro, B. Supriyadi, and R. R. Krishnamoorthy, “Dynamic Properties Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D Model for Concrete Box-Girder Bridge of 40-meter Span,” J. Civ. Eng. Forum, vol. 8, no. September, pp. 321–328, 2022, doi: 10.22146/jcef.4148.

[15] R. Suwondo, I. Hidayat, M. Suangga, M. Keintjem, and J. Walewangko, “Dynamic Assessment of a Railway Bridge using Operational Modal Analysis and Fast Fourier Transform: A Comparative Study with Finite Element Analysis,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19200–19206, 2025.

[16] C. A. Perez-Ramirez et al., “2113. Time-frequency techniques for modal parameters identification of civil structures from acquired dynamic signals,” J. Vibroengineering, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 3164–3185, 2016, doi: 10.21595/jve.2016.17220.

[17] B. S. Nasional, “Penerapan Standar Nasional Indonesia,” Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta, 2020.

[18] NZ Transport Agency, Bridge manual SP/M/022, no. SP/M/022. 2022.

[19] EN 1991-2, “Eurocode 1: Actions on structures-Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges,” vol. 1, no. 2005, 2011.

[20] H. Hasani and F. Freddi, “Operational Modal Analysis on Bridges: A Comprehensive Review,” Infrastructures, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 172, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures8120172.

[21] W. K. Ao, D. Hester, C. O’Higgins, and J. Brownjohn, “Tracking long-term modal behaviour of a footbridge and identifying potential SHM approaches,” J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1311–1337, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13349-024-00787-9.

[22] O. Avci, O. Abdeljaber, S. Kiranyaz, M. Hussein, M. Gabbouj, and D. J. Inman, “A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 147, p. 107077, 2021.

[23] F. Gong, C. Pan, and Y. Xia, “Experimental Study on the Damping Ratio Evaluation of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Based on Damping Dissipation Function,” Struct. Control Heal. Monit., vol. 2025, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1155/stc/5810450.

[24] C. Qu, G. Tu, F. Gao, L. Sun, S. Pan, and D. Chen, “Review of Bridge Structure Damping Model and Identification Method,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 21, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16219410.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

Akbar, M., Aminullah, A., & Awaludin, A. (2026). Operational Modal Analysis of a Box Girder Bridge using Fast Fourier Transform and Stochastic Subspace Identification . INERSIA Lnformasi Dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik Sipil Dan Arsitektur, 21(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v21i2.83380

Issue

Section

Articles