Uji perbandingan kegiatan laboratorium IoT dengan virtual laboratory berbasis HOT-LAB

Syifa Ramadiani, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Novia Silvianti, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Riki Purnama Putra, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Rena Denya Agustina, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract


Kegiatan laboratorium adalah suatu kegiatan yang sangat penting dalam dunia pendidikan, dimana kegiatan laboratorium bertujuan untuk mengonstruksi kerangka berpikir melalui eksperimen-eksperimen yang eksploratif. Pendidikan pada abad 21 harus mencakup 4C skills yang disebut juga sebagai kemampuan masa depan. Kerangka 4C skills akan dirasakan oleh para praktikan melalui kegiatan laboratorium yang dipadukan dengan HOT-LAB. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan menguji perbandingan dari hasil analisis data percobaan dengan teknik analisis data berupa Data Analytics dan Graphical Analytics yang diolah menggunakan perhitungan lalu diterapkan kepada origin pro. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan selisih yang tidak signifikan relatif terhadap nilai ralat, dengan hasil perhitungan ralat pada bandul 0,20m (0,9577±0,0005 s), bandul 0,25m (1,047±0,002 s), dan bandul 0,30m (1,099±0,003 s). Adapun perbandingan antara IoT dengan Virtual Lab mendapatkan nilai 0,025% pada panjang tali 0,20 m; 0,004% pada panjang tali 0,25 m; 0,04% pada panjang tali 0,30 m. Data tersebut menunjukkan kenaikan grafik dan rasio perbandingan pada percobaan pun relatif sama meskipun nilai yang dihasilkan berbeda sedikit.

Comparison test of IoT laboratory activities with HOT-LAB-based virtual laboratory

Laboratory activities are very important activities in the world of education, where laboratory activities aim to construct a frame of mind through exploratory experiments. Education in the 21st century must include 4C skills which are also known as future abilities. The 4C skills framework will be felt by practitioners through laboratory activities combined with HOT-LAB. The method used in this research is to examine the comparison of the results of the experimental data analysis with Data Analytics and Graphic Analytics. The results showed that the difference was not significant to the value of the error, with the results of the calculation of the error on the pendulum 0.20m (0.9577±0.0005 seconds), the pendulum 0.25m (1.047±0.002 seconds), and the pendulum 0.30m (1.099 seconds). ±0.003 seconds). The comparison between IoT and Virtual Lab gets a value of 0.025% at a rope length of 0.20 m; 0.004% at 0.25 m rope length; 0.04% at a rope length of 0.30 m. The data shows that the graphs and comparison ratios in the experiment are relatively the same even though the resulting values are slightly different.


Keywords


HOT-LAB; IoT; Phypox; Virtual Laboratory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Artono, B., & Putra, R. G. (2019). Penerapan internet of things (IoT) untuk kontrol lampu menggunakan arduino berbasis eeb. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Terapan, 5(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.25047/jtit.v5i1.73

Bakar, A., H, H., & A, A. (2020). Implementasi pembelajaran sains kimia berbasis eksperimen menggunakan aplikasi virtual lab authoring tool chemcollective. Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Pinang Masak, 1(2), 24–29.

Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood, D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers and Education, 53(3), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.005

Giancoli, D. C. (2005). Physics: principles with applications (Vol. 4). Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Herayanti, L. (2017). Virtual laboratory to improve students’ problem-solving skills on electricity concept. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 257–264.

Hidayatullah, Z., Nadhiroh, J. N., Kartika, E., Nuha, A. A., & Erlangga, S. Y. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi dan konflik kognitif fisika: kasus terkait perubahan konseptual. EDUSAINS, 12(1), 64–71.

Irwandi, I., Sari, I. M., Oktavia, R., & Syukri, M. (2020). MEMS and iot applications in ISLE-based STEM physics learning media for mechanics topic with LabVIEW integration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012066

Liana, Y. R., Linuwih, S., & Sulhadi, S. (2020). Internet of things based learning media with problem solving approach: Its effect on higher order thinking skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(2), 225–239.

Lima, F. M. S., & Arun, P. (2006). An accurate formula for the period of a simple pendulum oscillating beyond the small angle regime. American Journal of Physics, 74(10), 892–895.

Makiyah, Y. S., Malik, A., Susanti, E., & Mahmudah, I. R. (2019a). Higher order thinking real and virtual laboratory (HOTRVL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan abad ke-21 mahasiswa pendidikan fisika. Diffraction, 1(1), 34–38.

Makiyah, Y. S., Malik, A., Susanti, E., & Mahmudah, I. R. (2019b). Higher order thinking real and virtual laboratory (HOTRVL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan abad ke-21 mahasiswa pendidikan fisika. Diffraction, 1(1).

Malik, A, Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Permanasari, A., Samsudin, A., Safitri, D., Lisdiani, S. A. S., Sapriadil, S., & Hermita, N. (2018). Using hot lab to increase pre-service physics teacher’s critical thinking skills related to the topic of RLC circuit. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 12023.

Malik, Adam, & Setiawan, A. (2015). The development of higher order thinking laboratory to improve transferable skills of students. 2015 International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education, 36–40.

Malik, Adam, Yuningtias, U. A., Mulhayatiah, D., Chusni, M. M., Sutarno, S., Ismail, A., & Hermita, N. (2019). Enhancing problem-solving skills of students through problem solving laboratory model related to dynamic fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032010

Mohamed, F., Abdeslam, J., & Lahcen, E. B. (2018). Towards new approach to enhance learning based on internet of things and virtual reality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Optimization Algorithms: Theory and Applications, 1–5.

Muchlis, F., Sulisworo, D., & Toifur, M. (2018). Pengembangan alat

peraga fisika berbasis internet of things untuk praktikum hukum Newton II. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 13–20.

Nuraeni, N. (2018). Penerapan model praktikum higher order thinking laboratory (HOT-Lab) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik pada materi alat optik. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Putra, R P, Anjani, R. A., Agustina, R. D., & ... (2021). Student’s perspective on virtual laboratory using phet as a media in conducting physics laboratory activities. Tarbiyah: Jurnal …, 10(1), 1–9. http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/jtjik/article/view/4113

Putra, Riki Purnama, & Anjani, R. A. (2020). Analisis pemahaman siswa kelas 12 di sman 1 Cileunyi terhadap pembelajaran fisika online selama pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 6(2), 167–173.

Putra, Riki Purnama, Silvianti, N., Idris, S. F., & Nabilla, N. (2021). Uji perbandingan virtual lab dengan real lab pada hukum archimedes. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 14(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v14i1.897

Putri, D. H., Risdianto, E., & Sutarno, S. (2017). Pre-service physics teachers’ perception toward hands-on lab activity and 21st century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 12015.

Ramadani, E. M., & Nana, N. (2020). Penerapan problem based learning berbantuan virtual lab phet pada pembelajaran fisika guna meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa sma: Literature review. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 8(1).

Riduwan, & Akon. (2009). Belajar mudah penelitian: untuk guru karyawan dan peneliti pemula (6th ed.). Alfabeta.

Safitri, L. N., Fahrudin, & Jumadi. (2020). Comparison of students science process skills after using learning an experimental and virtual laboratory on Archimedes laws. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012079

Sari, P. I., Gunawan, G., & Harjono, A. (2017). Penggunaan discovery learning berbantuan laboratorium virtual pada penguasaan konsep fisika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(4), 176–182.

Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26–32.

Sugiana, I. N., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Gunawan, G. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran generatif berbantuan media laboratorium virtual terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika siswa pada materi momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i2.290

Tuhusula, T. S., Pattana, B., Randai, E., Wateriri, D. R., & Walukow, A. F. (2020). Experiments usingbased virtual lab phet simulation in learning physics on parabolic movement materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 128–135.

Widodo, A., Maria, R. A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Peranan praktikum riil dan praktikum virtual dalam membangun kreatifitas siswa. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(1), 92–102.

Zaman, K., Abdullah, A. Bin, Khan, A., Nasir, M. R. B. M., Hamzah, T. A. A. T., & Hussain, S. (2016). Dynamic linkages among energy consumption, environment, health and wealth in BRICS countries: Green growth key to sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.010




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v15i1.41485

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Supervised by:

Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan has been indexed by:

  

View My Stats