Evaluasi proses bimbingan skripsi mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta berdasar perspektif pembelajaran orang dewasa

Sugito Sugito, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sunaryo Soenarto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Entoh Tohani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Dalam menghadapi tantangan dan permasalahan abad kedua puluh satu ini, pendidikan tinggi memiliki peran yang sangat strategis. Mata kuliah Skripsi dapat berperan untuk mengembangkan kemampuan guna menghadapi tantangan dan masalah yang dihadapi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi proses pembimbingan skripsi dari perspektif teori pembelajaran orang dewasa, hambatan dan upaya yang dilakukan mahasiswa dan dosen dalam proses penulisan skripsi mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY). Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sebagai sampel adalah mahasiswa yang sudah menyelesaikan penulisan skripsi, dan dosen pembimbing. Keduanya diambil secara purposif. Jumlah responden adalah 190 orang mahasiswa dan 53 orang dosen. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan angket. Data yang diperoleh melalui angket dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif dengan teknik persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) proses pembimbingan cenderung sudah menggunakan prinsip pembelajaran orang dewasa, yang lebih menekankan pada proses belajar mandiri; (2) hambatan yang dihadapi meliputi substansi dan metode penelitian, kemampuan bahasa asing, psikologis, dan kelengkapan sumber referensi; dan (3) upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi hambatan meliputi peningkatan motivasi diri, berusaha sendiri dan pemberian kesempataan dosen pada mahasiswa untuk menyampaikan permasalahan yang dihadapi.

 

EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE THESIS MENTORING PROCESS IN UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA BASED ON ADULT LEARNING PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

In facing the twenty-first century’s challenges and problems, higher education plays a very strategic role. Undergraduate thesis can contribute in developing the ability to address the challenges and problems. This study aims at evaluating the process of mentoring through the lens of adult learning theory by looking at the students’ and lecturers’ obstacles and efforts in the process of thesis writing among college students. This research was conducted using a quantitative approach with a purposively selected sample of 190 students who have completed their thesis writing, and 53 supervisors. The data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed descriptively in percentages. The results show that: (1) the process of mentoring tends to have used the principle of adult learning with more emphasis on self-directed learning; (2) the encountered obstacles include research substance and methods, foreign language abilities, psychological factors, and reference sources; and (3) some activities done to overcome the obstacles include improving self-motivation, self-effort, and providing opportunities for the students to consult their problems to the lecturer.


Keywords


bimbingan skripsi; pembelajaran orang dewasa; undergraduate thesis mentoring; adult learning

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References


Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: a framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x

Deloach, S. B., Perry-Sizemore, E., & Borg, M. O. (2012). Creating quality undergraduate research programs in economics: how, when, where (and why). The American Economist, 57(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451205700108

Dobozy, E. (2011). Constrained by ideology: attitudinal barriers to undergraduate research in Australian teacher education. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 5(2), 36–47.

Flynn, T. (Terry). (2014). Do they have what it takes: A review of the literature on knowledge, competencies and skills necessary for 21st century public relations practitioners in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, 39(3).

Freire, P. (1980). Pendidikan kaum tertindas (Terjemahan). Jakarta: LP3ES.

Harsh, J. A., Maltese, A. V, & Tai, R. H. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 84–91. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43748287

Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173

Husin, W. N. F. W., Arsad, N. M., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project oriented problem based learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1).

Ishiyama, J. (2002). Does early participation in undergraduate research benefit social science and humanities students? College Student Journal, 36(3), 381–387.

Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2010). Undergraduate research and international initiatives to link teaching and research. Council on Undergraduate Research, 30(3), 36–42.

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. The Adult Learner (6th ed.). New York: Elsevier.

Kovacevic, M., & Pavlovic, N. (2016). Globalization and the knowledge society. Ekonomika, 62(4), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika1604095K

Magolda, M. B. B. (2007). Self-authorship: The foundation for twenty-first-century education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007(109), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.266

Mancha, R., & Yoder, C. Y. (2014a). Factors critical to successful undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Factors+critical+to+successful+undergraduate+research.-a0377777162

Mancha, R., & Yoder, C. Y. (2014b). Factors critical to successful undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly.

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi (2014).

Odera, E., Lamm, A. J., Odera, L. C., Duryea, M., & Davis, J. (2015). Understanding how research experiences foster undergraduate research skill development and influence STEM career choice. North American Colleges and Teacher of Agriculture, 59(3).

Pamungkasari, E. P., & Probandari, A. (2012). Pengukuran kemampuan belajar mandiri pada mahasiswa pendidikan profesi dokter. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2). Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/1128

Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of mentoring research: integration with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9233-3

Webber, K. L., Laird, T. F. N., & BrckaLorenz, A. M. (2013). Student and faculty member engagement in undergraduate research. Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 227–249. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23355287

Yamada, A., & Yamada, R. (2016). Impact of globalization on Japanese Higher Education Policy: examining campus internationalization and challenge of Japanese Universities. Current Politics and Economics of Northern and Western Asia, 25(1).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.17150

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics