Perbandingan antara Keefektifan Model Guided Discovery Learning dan Project-Based Learning pada Matakuliah Geometri

Okky Riswandha Imawan

doi:10.21831/pg.v10i2.9156

Perbandingan antara Keefektifan Model Guided Discovery Learning dan Project-Based Learning pada Matakuliah Geometri

Okky Riswandha Imawan, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v10i2.9156

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan dan perbedaan keefektifan antara model Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) dan model Project- Based Learning (PjBL) ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kepercayaan diri, dan keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa pada matakuliah geometri ruang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen. Subjek penelitian ini adalah dua kelas mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Ahmad Dahlan semester 2 yang dipilih secara acak. Analisis data untuk menguji keefektifan model GDL dan model PjBL ditinjau dari masing-masing variabel terikat menggunakan Uji t. Sedangkan teknik analisis data untuk menguji perbedaan antara keefektifan model GDL dan model PjBL menggunakan Uji MANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kepercayaan diri, dan keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa diketahui bahwa penerapan model GDL pada matakuliah Geometri Ruang efektif, penerapan Model PjBL pada matakuliah Geometri Ruang efektif, dan tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan model GDL dan model PjBL pada matakuliah Geometri Ruang.

Kata Kunci: model guided discovery learning, model project-based learning, prestasi belajar, kepercayaan diri, keterampilan berpikir kritis

The Comparisons Between the Effectiveness of the Guided Discovery Learning Model and Project-Based Learning Model on Solid Geometry Subjects

Abstract

This research aims to describe the effectiveness and effectiveness differences of the Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) Model and the Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model in terms of achievement, self-confidence, and critical thinking skills of students on the Solid Geometry subjects. This research was quasi experimental. The research subjects were two undergraduate classes of Mathematics Education Program, Ahmad Dahlan University, in their second semester, established at random. The data analysis to test the effectiveness of the GDL and PjBL Models in terms of each of the dependent variables used the t-test. The data analysis to test differences between effectiveness of the GDL and that of the PjBL Model used the MANOVA test. The results of this research show that viewed from achievement, self confidence, and critical thinking skills of the students are the application of the GDL Model on Solid Geometry subject is effective, the application of the PjBL Model on Solid Geometry subject is effective, and there is no difference in the effectiveness of GDL and PjBL Models on Solid Geometry subject in terms of achievement, self confidence, and critical thinking skills of the students.

Keywords: guided discovery learning model, project-based learning model, achievement, self-confidence, critical thinking skills

Keywords

guided discovery learning model; project-based learning model; achievement; self-confidence; critical thinking skills

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Akanmu, M., & Fajemiddagba, M. O. (2013). Guided-discovery learning strategies and senior school students performance in mathematics in ejigbo, nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, Volume 4, No 12, PP 82-90.

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning. New York, NY: Routladge Taylor and Francis Group.

Boyd, D., & Bee, H. (2009). Lifespan development fifth edition. Boston: Pearson Education.

Epstein, R. L., & Kernberger, C. (2006). Critical thinking. Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth.

Feldman, D. A. (2010). Berpikir Kritis. (Terjemahan Ati Cahayani) Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Filcik, A. et al. (2012). The effects of project-based learning (PjBL) approach on the achievement and efficacy of high school mathematics students: a longitudinal study investigating the effects of pjbl approach in mathematics education. Proceedings of The National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR), 29-31 Maret 2012. Odgen Utah: Weber State University, Utah.

Gambrill, E., & Gibbs, L. (2009). Critical thinking for healping professional. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ghufron, M., & S., R. R. (2010). Teori-teori psikologi. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.

Glazer, E. (2001). Using internet primary sources to teach critical thinking skills in mathematics. Westpost: Greenwood Press.

Happy, N., & Widjajanti, D., B. (2014). Keefektifan PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis, serta self-esteem siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika. Volumw 1, No 2, P 48-57.

Hudojo, H. (1988). Mengajar belajar matematika. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Huberty C.J., & Olejnik S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Johnson, R., & Wichern D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis 6th edition. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Linguistika, Y., Listyani, E., & Retnawati, H. (2013). Peta penguasaan materi matematika guru sma dan hubungannya dengan prestasi belajar siswa. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. P-87.

Masek, A., & Yamin, S. (2011). The effect of problem based learning on critical thinking ability: a theoretical and empirical review. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, Volume 2, No 1, PP 215-221.

McElmeel, S. L. (2002). Character education. Colorado: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

McPheat, S. (2010). Personal confidence & motivation. UK: MTD Training & Ventus Publishing.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. (2011). Educational assessment of student sixth edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Ozdemir, E. (2006). An investigation on the effects of project-based learning on students’ achievement and attitude toward geomerty. Tesis Magister, Middle East Technical University.

Prihantomo, H. (2012). The quality improvement on integral mathematics learning by guided discovery learning model at class xii building technique salatiga academic year 2011/2012. Tesis Magister, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang.

Starkey, L. B. (2010). Critical thinking skills success in 20 minutes a day 2nd edition. New York, NY: LearningExpress.

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 5th edition. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Sudjana, N. (1992). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sulistyowati, N., Widodo, A. T., & Sumarni, W. (2012). Efektifitas model pembelajaran guided discovery learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah kimia. Chemistry in Education, Volume 2, No 1, Agustus 2012, PP 50-55. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Syah, M. (2014). Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Taghva, F. et al. (2014). Studying the relationship between critical thinking skills and students’ educational achievement (eghlid universities as case study). International Letter of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Volume 25, PP 18-25.

Tan, A. (2007). Creativity. Singapore: World Scientific.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project based learning. California: The Autodesk Foundation.

Tran, T. et al. (2014). Discovery learning with the help of the geogebra dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, Volume 7, No 1, Agustus 2014, PP 44-57.

Udo, M. E. (2011). Effects of problem-solving, guided-discovery, and expository teaching strategies on students’ performance in redox reaction. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Volume 5, No 21, Juli 2011, PP 231-241. Etiopia.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Winkel, W. S. (1996). Psikologi pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i2.9156