Keefektifan Pendekatan CTL dan PPM Pembelajaran Matematika Metode GTG Ditinjau Keaktifan dan Prestasi Siswa

Nuryadi Nuryadi

doi:10.21831/pg.v9i1.9059

Keefektifan Pendekatan CTL dan PPM Pembelajaran Matematika Metode GTG Ditinjau Keaktifan dan Prestasi Siswa

Nuryadi Nuryadi, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v9i1.9059

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dan Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah (PPM) menggunakan metode Group to Group (GG) pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari keaktifan dan prestasi belajar siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksprerimen semu dengan pretest-postest nonequivalent control group design. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua kelompok eksperimen. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VIII MTs Negeri Godean yang terdiri dari empat kelas. Dari populasi yang ada diambil secara acak dua kelas yaitu VIII A dan VIII C sebagai sampel penelitian. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar dan lembar observasi aktivitas belajar siswa terhadap matematika. Hasil penelitian menunjukkkan bahwa penerapan Pendekatan CTL dan PPM menggunakan metode GG dalam pembelajaran matematika efektif ditinjau dari aktivitas dan prestasi belajar siswa dalam matematika

Kata Kunci: aktivitas belajar siswa, pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan pemecahan masalah, metode group to group, prestasi belajar siswa

Effectiveness of CTL Approach and PPM with GTG Method on Mathematics Teaching in Terms of Learning Activeness and Achievement of the Students

Abstract

This research aims to describe the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach and Problem-Solving (PS) Approach with Group to Group (GG) method on mathematics teaching in terms of learning activeness and achievement of the students. This study used two experimental groups. The population includes all 8th grade students of MTs N Godean which consist of four classes. A sample of two classes, VIII A and VIII C was established randomly teaching. The instruments used to collect the data are a mathematics achievement test and questionnaire. The result of the research shows that the application of the CTL Approach and PS Approach with GG method on mathematics teaching is effective in terms of learning activeness and achievement in mathematics.

Keywords: student learning activity, contextual teaching and learning approach and problem-solving approach, group to group method, students’ achievement.

Keywords

student learning activity; contextual teaching and learning approach and problem-solving approach; group to group method; students’ achievement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anonim. (2005). Materi pembinaan matematika SMP di daerah. Yogyakarta: Depdiknas

CORD. (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually. CORD communications, Inc. United States of America. http://www.cord.org.uplodedfiles/teaching math. contextually.pdf. diakses tanggal 7 Mei 2011.

Fink, D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22, tahun 2006, tentang standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah.

Ebel, R. I., & Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essencial of educational mesurement. (4thed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hell, Inc.

Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co

Johnson, R.A & Wichern, D.W .(2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. London: Pearson Prenti ce Hall

Katz S. & Smith, B. P. (2006). Using contextual teaching and learning in foods and nutrition class .journal of family and consumer sciences; Jan 2006; 98, 1; ProQuest Education Journals p.82. http://www.proquest.com Diakses tanggal 5 Agustus 2011.

Kennedy, M. L (2008). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

Lewis, C. C. (2011, November). Building japanese style structured problem-solving outside Japan: What Supportsare Needed?, APEC-Ubon Ratchathani International Symposium.

Muijs, D. & Reynalds, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice (2nd ed). London: SAGE

Mullis, I.V.S., et al. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Murni, A., Nurul Yusra T., & Solfitri, T. (2010). Penerapan metode belajar aktif tipe group to group exchange untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas X IPS 1 MAN 2 model Pekanbaru. Journal Penelitian Pendidikan. Diambil pada tanggal 12 Februari 2012, dari http://educare.e-fkipunla.net/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1 &id=62

NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Orton, A. (2006). Learning mathematics issues, theory and classroom practice Third Edition. London: Cassell.

Rusman. (2010). Model-model pembelajaran, mengembangkan profesionalisme guru Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Raja Geafindo Persada

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Media Group.

Sousa, D. A. (2008). How the brain learns mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Suherman, E. (2001). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: FMIPA UPI-JICA

Tatsuaoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: techniques for educational and psychological research. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guide tour. CD-Rom of the RME materials, produced for the ICME9 congress in Japan, July 2000.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9059