Pembelajaran hubungan antar sudut menggunakan model pembelajaran guided inquiry

Sundari Gita Pertiwi; Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana

doi:10.21831/pg.v15i2.35415

Pembelajaran hubungan antar sudut menggunakan model pembelajaran guided inquiry

Sundari Gita Pertiwi, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v15i2.35415

Abstract

Materi geometri merupakan materi yang penting untuk dipelajari karena berkaitan dengan kehidupan sehari-hari dan sebagai materi dasar pendukung penguasaan materi matematika yang lain. Namun, materi geometri, khususnya materi hubungan antar sudut, masih dianggap sulit dipahami oleh siswa. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan suatu model pembelajaran yang interaktif dan dapat menuntun siswa menemukan sendiri konsep yang dipelajari untuk mengembangkan pemahaman mereka. Salah satu model pembelajaran alternatif yang dapat digunakan adalah model guided inquiry atau penyelidikan terbimbing yang mana dalam model pembelajaran tersebut siswa adalah pusat pembelajaran dan guru adalah fasilitator dan motivator belajar siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif untuk mendeskripsikan proses pembelajaran yang menerapkan model guided inquiry. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SMP Negeri 3 Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dengan subyek penelitian yaitu siswa kelas VII (n = 32). Data penelitian dikumpulkan dalam bentuk rekaman audio dan video, foto, dan lembar aktivitas siswa. Data dianalisis dengan cara mereduksi, menampilkan, dan menyimpulkan data, setelah itu ditulis dalam bentuk narasi deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi model guided inquiry dalam pembelajaran hubungan antar sudut yang terdiri atas tiga pertemuan dengan beberapa aktivitas pembelajaran mendeskripsikan proses pembelajaran yang baik.

Inter-angular relationship learning using a guided inquiry learning model

Abstract

Geometry is one of the essential materials to learn because it is related to everyday life and as basic material to support mastery of other mathematics materials. However, the material of geometry, especially the material on the inter-angular relationships, is still considered hard to be understood by students. Therefore, there is a need for a learning model that is more interactive and can provide guidance for students to find the concepts by themselves. One of the alternative learning models that can be used is the guided inquiry, wherein that learning model, the students are the center of learning and the teacher is the facilitator and motivator of students’ learning. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method to describe the learning process that implemented the guided inquiry model. The research was conducted at one of the public junior high schools in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, namely SMP Negeri 3 Bantul in which the subject was 32 seventh graders. The research data were collected in the form of audio and video recordings, photos, and student activity sheets. The data were analyzed by reducing, presenting, and concluding, then it was written in the form of descriptive narration. The results demonstrated that the implementation of the guided inquiry model in the inter-angular relationships learning that consisted of three meetings with several learning activities described an excellent learning process.

Keywords

Pembelajaran hubungan antar sudut; pemahaman matematis; guided inquiry learning model; inter-angular relationships learning; mathematical understanding

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References

Ananda, R. P., Sanapiah, S., & Yulianti, S. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa kelas VII SMPN 7 Mataram dalam menyelesaikan soal garis dan sudut tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v6i2.1838

Biber, Ç., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9387

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Allyn & Bacon.

Budhi, M. N. C. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran contextual guided inquiry untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i1.13512

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0

Delclaux, M., & Saltiel, E. (2013). An evaluation of local teacher support strategies for the implementation of inquiry-based science education in French primary schools. Education 3-13, 41(2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2011.564198

Fabiyi, T. R. (2017). Geometry concepts in mathematics perceived difficult to learn by senior secondary school students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701018390

FitzGerald, L., & Garrison, K. L. (2016). Investigating the guided inquiry process. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, L. Roy, & T. Çakmak (Eds.), Information literacy: Key to an inclusive society: 4th European Conference, European Conference on Information Literacy (Vol. 676, pp. 667–677). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_65

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gunur, B., Lalus, E., & Ali, F. A. (2019). Students’ understanding of mathematical concepts through the guided inquiry learning. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v9i02.7260

Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520–532. https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.520

Hanson, D. M. (2013). POGIL: Instructor’s guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry learning. Pacific Crest. https://pcrest.com/research/POGIL_Instructor_Guide2014.pdf

Hartati, H., Setyasto, N., Sutikno, P. Y., & Renggani, R. (2019). Peningkatan keterampilan profesional guru-guru SD gugus Ganesha Windusari Magelang melalui pelatihan implementasi model inquiry based learning (IBL) bermuatan six pillars of character. Jurnal Panjar: Pengabdian Bidang Pembelajaran, 1(1), 9–16. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/panjar/article/view/28461

Hussain, M. (2015). Book review: Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i1.50

Kuhlthau, C. C., & Maniotes, L. K. (2010). Building guided inquiry teams for 21st-century learners. School Library Monthly, 26(5), 18–21. https://www.eduscapes.com/instruction/articles/articlestoupload/kulthau.pdf

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century (2nd ed.). ABC-CLIO.

Kurniashih, R., Syarifuddin, H., & Darmansyah, D. (2019). The influence of guided inquiry learning model on students’ mathematical problem solving ability. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 178(1), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.78

Maisyarah, S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2020). Pembelajaran luas permukaan bangun ruang sisi datar menggunakan pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Jurnal Elemen, 6(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i1.1713

Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (Eds.). (2008). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (Vol. 994). American Chemical Society.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education.

Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836

Nuriyatin, S., & Hartono, H. (2016). Pengembangan pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing untuk meningkatkan berpikir kritis dan motivasi belajar geometri di SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10656

Owens, K., & Outhred, L. (2006). The complexity of learning geometry and measurement. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present, and future (pp. 83-115). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_005

Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55(1), 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557

Panaoura, A. (2014). Using representations in geometry: A model of students’ cognitive and affective performance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(4), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.851804

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Design research (Teori dan implementasinya: Suatu pengantar). Rajawali Pers.

Puspendik. (2019). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2018-2019. Balitbang, Kemendikbud. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/

Putra, M. I. S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The development of guided inquiry science learning materials to improve science literacy skill of prospective MI teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 83–93. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/article/view/5794

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., Munadi, S., Hadiana, D., Muhardis, M., Apino, E., Djidu, H., Rafi, I., Yusron, E., & Rosyada, M. N. (2019). When national examination no longer determining graduation, will students accomplish it seriously? Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 2(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v2i2.34

Rochana, S. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran geometri bangun ruang SMP dengan menggunakan model guided inquiry. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10659

Rofii, A., Sunardi, S., & Irvan, M. (2018). Characteristics of students’ metacognition process at informal deduction thinking level in geometry problems. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.7684

Rosdianah, R., Kartinah, K., & Muhtarom, M. (2019). Analisis faktor penyebab kesulitan belajar matematika pada materi garis dan sudut kelas VII sekolah menengah pertama. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(5), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v1i5.4458

Sahrir, S., & Ratumanan, T. G. (2018). Komparasi hasil belajar geometri pada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif dilengkapi aplikasi swishmax, pembelajaran kooperatif tanpa swishmax, dan model pembelajaran konvensional. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(1), 10-20. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jpmr/article/view/5794

Yulianti, E., Mustikasari, V. R., Hamimi, E., Rahman, N. F. A., & Nurjanah, L. F. (2020). Experimental evidence of enhancing scientific reasoning through guided inquiry model approach. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(1), 050016. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000637

Yumiati, Y., & Noviyanti, M. (2017). Abilities of reasoning and mathematics representation on guided inquiry learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i3.6041

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i2.35415