Keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery ditinjau dari prestasi, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kecemasan matematika

Enggar Prasetyawan

doi:10.21831/pg.v13i2.21221

Keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery ditinjau dari prestasi, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kecemasan matematika

Enggar Prasetyawan, Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v13i2.21221

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan dan perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dan Discovery ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain nonequivalent groups prestest-posttest. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Ngaglik. Sampel penelitian ini adalah kelas X MIA 2 dan X MIA 4 yang diperoleh melalui pemilihan secara acak dari empat kelas yang masing-masing siswanya berjumlah 31 orang. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar berupa soal pilihan ganda yang terdiri dari 20 butir soal, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis berupa soal uraian yang terdiri dari 4 butir soal, dan angket kecemasan matematika yang terdiri dari 32 butir pernyataan. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery dilakukan dengan uji one sample t-test. Pengujian perbedaan keefektifan antara pendekatan CTL dan Discovery dilakukan dengan uji MANOVA (Hotteling’s Trace). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan CTL dan discovery efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika, (2) tidak ada perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan Discovery ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika.

Effectiveness of CTL and discovery approach viewed from students’ achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness and difference of effectiveness between of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and discovery approach viewed from students’ learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety. This research was quasi experiment with nonequivalent groups prestest-posttest design. The population in this study was all students of class X of SMAN 2 Ngaglik. The sample of the study was the students of X MIA 2 and X MIA 4 which is determined randomly from four classes which each of that classes consist of 31 students. The instruments used to collect data were a learning achievement test consisting of 20 multiple choice questions, a critical thinking ability test consisting of 5 essays, and math anxiety questionnaires that consisted of 32 statements. To determine the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Discovery approach, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach and Discovery approach MANOVA (Hotteling’s Trace) was used. The results show that (1) Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Discovery approach are effective viewed from student’s learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety,(2) there is no difference in effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach and Discovery approach viewed from student’s learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety.

Keywords

Contextual Teaching and Learning; pendekatan discovery; prestasi belajar; kemampuan berpikir kritis; kecemasan matematika; discovery approach; learning achievement; critical thinking; math anxiety

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Apriza, B. (2015). Keefektifan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dan Pendekatan Discovery Setting Think Pair Share (TPS) pada Materi Program Linier Ditinjau dari Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa SMK. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Arem, C. (2010). Conquering math anxiety. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185.

Baker, E. D., Hope, L. & Karandjeff. K. (2009). Contextualized teaching and learning: a faculty primer. California, CA: Community colleges.

Blazer, C. (2011). Strategies for reducing math anxiety. Journal Information Capsule Research Services, Vol. 1102, 1 – 8.

Brink, R., V., & Budgen. (2006). Critical Thinking for A2. Oxford: Howtobooks

Castronova, J. A. (2002). Discovery learning for the 21st century: What is it and how does it compare to traditional learning in effectiveness in the 21st century?. Diambil tanggal 22 Februari 2016 dari http://www.myenglishpages.com/files/1282044031.pdf

Crawford, M. C. (2001). Teaching Contextually Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Waco, Texas, TX: CCI Publishing, Inc.

Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B., & Metcalf, K. K. (2012). The act of teaching (6th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking disposition: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165-182.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: an outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Presentation at the Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT, Cambridge, MA. Diambil tanggal 27 Agustus 2015, dari http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf.

Gambrill, E., & Gibbs, L. (2009). Critical thinking for helping professional. Madison Avenue, NY: OXFORD University Press.

Jacob, S. M. (2012). Mathematical achievement and critical thinking skills in asynchronous discussion forums, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31 (2012), 800–804.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: menjadikan kegiatan belajar-mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. California, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. Diterjemahkan dari Contextual Teaching and Learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press,Inc.

Kamaei, A. & Weisani, M. (2013). The relationship between achievement motivation, critical thinking and creative thinking with academic performance. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Science, 3(4), 121-127.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud nomor 59 tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum SMA. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Lau, J.Y.F. (2011). An introduction to critical thinking and creativity: Think more, think better. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Muslich, M. (2008). KTSP Pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi dan kontekstual. Jakarta, ID: Bumi Aksara.

Mayer, D.P. (2008). Overcoming school anxiety: how to help your child deal with separation, tests, homework, bullies, math pobia, and other worries. New York, NY: AMACOM

Napitupulu, E. E. (2008). Mengembangkan strategi dan kemampuan siswa memecahkan masalah matematik. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 26-36. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/557

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Person Education

Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assesment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Merrill Pentice Hall.

OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: first results from pisa 2003. Paris: OECD. Diambil tanggal 28 Desember 2015, dari http://www.oecd.org/ edu-cation/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002216.pdf.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics,reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). PISA. OECD Publishing.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Announcing the 28th annual international conference on critical thinking. Near University of California at Baerkeley.

Rahmawati E.S, Y., & Harta, I. (2014). Keefektifan pendekatan open-ended dan CTL ditinjau dari hasil belajar kognitif dan afektif. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 113-126. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2669

Reynolds, C. R, Livingston, R. B., & Wilson, V. (2010) Measurement and assesment in education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Saab, N, Joolingen, W. R, & Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2005). Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 603-621.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories. (terjemahan Eva Hamdiah & Rahmat Fajar). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Septiana, A. (2015). Keefektifan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) dan inkuiri ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan adversity quotient terhadap matematika siswa SMP negeri 1 curup tengah kelas VII semester 2. Tesis Magister tidak dipublikasikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sherman, B.F. & Wither, D.P. (2003). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 138-150.

Siregar, N., & Marsigit, M. (2015). Pengaruh pendekatan discovery yang menekankan aspek analogi terhadap prestasi belajar, kemampuan penalaran, kecerdasan emosional spiritual. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 224 - 234.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7336

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational pschology theory and practice eighth edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Smith, A. (2013). Can inquiry math resolve math anxiety?. Diambil tanggal 22 februari 2016 dari http://www.yrdsb.ca/ Programs/PLT/Quest/Journal/2013-Can-inquiry-math-resolve-math-anxiety.pdf.

Smith, B. P. (2010). Instructional strategies in family and consumer sciences: Implementing the contextual teaching and learning pedagogical model. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 28(1), 23-38.

Sousa, D. A. (2008). How the brain learns mathematics. Thaousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences fifth edition. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

Syahbana, A. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP melalui pendekatan contextual teaching and learning. Edumatica, 02(01), 45-57.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research. New york, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Thijsse, L.J. (2002). The effects of a structured teaching method on mathematics anxiety and achievement of grade eight learners. Thesis Master of Education. University of South Africa.

Westwood, P. (2008). What teacher need to know about teaching methods. Victoria, AU: ACER Press.

Zakaria, E. & Nordin, N. M. (2008). The effects of mathematics anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2008, 4(1), 27-30

Zeidner, M. & Matthews, G. (2011). Anxiety 101. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i2.21221