Email this article Developing ESP students’ online text reading performance and strategies in small group discussion
Slamet Setiawan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Syafi’ul Anam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Abstract
Reading English text is often regarded as a difficult task by English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students during their individual reading time. Therefore, this research investigates the impact of a small group discussion on ESP students’ online text reading performance and strategies. The quantitative research, employing a pre-experimental design, purposively recruited 90 students from the Computer Science and Engineering Faculty. The data were collected through pre- and post-assessments on reading comprehension and a survey on reading strategies. Analyzed using SPSS 27.0, the data of the research show that the small group discussion highly affects reading performance of ESP students. Besides, their reported reading strategy use demonstrates a high frequency of use in all three strategy categories (PROB, GLOB, SUP), with no significant difference found in all categories by age and major. In conclusion, the implementation of a small group discussion in the ESP classroom can effectively improve the online text reading performance and develop reading strategies of the students. It also positively implies that educators can employ a small group discussion to promote other reading aspects in various educational settings.
Keywords
References
International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11220a
Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-Group Discussion in Physics: Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
Arrastia, M. C., Zayed, A. M., & Elnagar, H. Z. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Preservice Teachers: An Exploration of Gender and Developmental Differences. International Research in Higher Education, 1(2), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.5430/irhe.v1n2p46
Babashamasi, P., Shakib Kotamjani, S., & Binti Noordin, N. (2022). The Effect of Explicit Training of Metacognitive Reading Strategies on Online Reading Comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 8, 246–261. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.17
Baştuğ, M. (2014). Baştuğ.pdf. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences ·, 6(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2014.02.003
Begeny, J. C., Yeager, A., & Martínez, R. S. (2012). Effects of Small-Group and One-on-One Reading Fluency Interventions with Second Grade, Low-Performing Spanish Readers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9141-x
Chen, J., Lin, T. J., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Ha, S. Y., & Paul, N. (2023). Linkages between cognitive and social dialogue patterns during collaborative small-group discussions. Learning and Instruction, 87(May), 101795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101795
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707181-60
Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2023). Engagement in high-leverage science teaching practices among novice elementary teachers. Science Education, 107(2), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21766
Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086260
Esquivel-Martín, T., Bravo-Torija, B., & Pérez-Martín, J. M. (2023). Solving a problem about cancer treatment: how does the use of the mitotic spindle model evolve during small group discussions? Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1924230
Gallagher, T. L., Grierson, A., Susin, C., & Gallagher, T. L. (2023). Reading Horizons : A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts Coaching High School English Teachers in Guided Reading for Struggling Readers Coaching High School English Teachers in Guided Reading for Struggling Readers. 62(2).
Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. In Assisting Students Struggling with Math and Reading: Response to Intervention Guides.
Hamidzada, H., Sinha, S., Roberts, M., & Dalili, S. (2023). Facilitated Study Groups for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Experience from a Large Public Canadian University. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.13734
Hayashi, K., Mochizuki, T., & Yamauchi, Y. (2023). A case study of process performances during a small-group activity: comparison between a round-shaped and a crescent-shaped seating arrangements in studio-style learning spaces. Learning Environments Research, 26(2), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09436-8
Heidari Darani, L., Morady Moghaddam, M., & Murray, N. (2023). The Effect of Student-Led Small-Group Discussion as a Pre-writing Task on the Development of EFL Students’ Writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(5), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00680-3
Heron, M., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Hatch, R. J. (2023). Patterns of talk in Foundation Year small group interaction: making the case for educational dialogue. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(4), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2138286
Jaramillo Cherrez, N. (2023). Willingness to communicate and oral communicative performance through asynchronous video discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 2023(1), 1–23. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73521
Kalita Nath, P. (2021). LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network The Effect of Planned Instruction on Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 194–221. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
Kamola, K. (2023). Grouping Activities For ENGLISH Lessons: Fostering Collaboration And Language Development. Modern Science and Research, 2(10), 69–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10077298
Klubnik, C., & Ardoin, S. P. (2010). Examining immediate and maintenance effects of a reading intervention package on generalization materials: Individual verses group implementation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9096-3
Knox, J., & Kontorovich, I. (2023). Growing research groves to visualize young students’ learning in small groups. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(2), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00422-0
Lahuerta Martinez, A. C. (2008). Analysis of ESP University Students’ Reading Strategy Awareness. Iberica, 15(spring), 165–176. https://doi.org/https://api.core.ac.uk/oai/oai:doaj.org/article:a8559b7307044e5e89683cd6923d705b
Lazar, G. (2009). Literature and Language Teaching A guide for teachers and trainers (19th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mamakli, S., Alimoğlu, M. K., & Daloğlu, M. (2023). Scenario-based learning: preliminary evaluation of the method in terms of students’ academic achievement, in-class engagement, and learner/teacher satisfaction. Advances in Physiology Education, 47(1), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1152/ADVAN.00122.2022
Manh Do, H., & Le Thu Phan, H. (2021). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies on Second Language Vietnamese Undergraduates. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7
Massé, J., Grignon, S., Vigneault, L., Olivier-D’Avignon, G., & Tremblay, M. C. (2024). Patients’ perspectives on their motivations for participating in non-clinical medical teaching and what they gain from their experience: a qualitative study informed by critical theory. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 29(1), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10262-7
Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Molotja, T. W., & Themane, M. (2020). Enhancing learners’ reading habits through reading bags at secondary schools. Reading and Writing (South Africa), 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/RW.V9I1.185
Naseri, M., & Zaferanieh, E. (2012). The Relationship Between Reading Self-efficacy Beliefs, Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Level of Iranian EFL Learners. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p64
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EF version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(94)00047-a
Pammu, A., Amir, Z., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014). Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Less Proficient Tertiary Learners: A Case Study of EFL Learners at a Public University in Makassar, Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.049
Par, L. (2020). The relationship between reading strategies and reading achievement of the EFL students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13216a
Pilgrim, J., Vasinda, S., Bledsoe, C., & Martinez, E. E. (2018). Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts Language Arts Elementary Students Elementary Students. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 57(3), 68–84. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons
Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2011). Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2011.539913
Ren, X. (2022). Evaluating Lexical Complexity From EGP to ESP Textbooks. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(5), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.09
Saidova, S. (2022). the Importance of Using Esp Reading Techniques in Students Learning. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 03(12), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-03-12-05
Schneiter, K., Hadfield, K. L. F., & Clements, J. L. (2023). Leveraging the “Large” in Large Lecture Statistics Classes. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2022.2099488
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
Talebi, S. H., Maghsoudi, M., & Khodamoradi, A. (2020). Perceived Reading Strategy Awareness and Use (RSAU) and Reading Ability across Foreign Language Disciplines at the University Level. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 50(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1786480
Tavakoli, H. (2014). The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension : The Case of Iranian University EFL Students. 14(2), 314–336.
Turk, J. K. (2023). Literature circles promote accountability and student engagement with assigned reading in a soil science class. Natural Sciences Education, 52(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20103
Valizadeh, M. (2021). The Effect of Reading Strategies Instruction on EFL Learners’ Reading Performances. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(S1-May), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9is1-may.4002
Wallace, M. P., Li, V. M., Huang, T. C., & He, N. C. (2021). Metacognitive Strategy Use for EFL Readers : Differences in Gender and Reading Ability Reading Comprehension Metacognition and Reading. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 25(2), 1–22.
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2011). Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800105
Wen, Z., Lin, T. J., Glassman, M., Kim, S., Tilak, S., Nagpal, M., & Ha, S. Y. (2023). The Development of Early Adolescents’ Social Perspective Taking Through Small-Group Discussion. Journal of Early Adolescence, 43(9), 1129–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221149630
Wotring, A., Chen, H., & Fraser, M. (2024). They Are Talking, But Is It Productive? Exploring EFL Students’ Small Group Talk. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3227
Wu, S., Stratton, K. K., & Gadke, D. L. (2023). A Group Reading Intervention With Individualized Error Correction for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 12(3), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1181
Yüksel, I., & Yüksel, I. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 894–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164
Zhang, T., & Zheng, J. (2020). For researchers particularly concerned with L2 reading comprehension, the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) developed by Mokhari & Reichard (2002b) is one of the most widely used scales. Educational Research and Development Journal, 22(2020), 22–38.
Zohrabi, M. (2015). Trends in esp and egp. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0603.27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v23i2.73099
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
______________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
__________________________________________________________________________________________________