Critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s tweets: An authentic teaching material for critical reading

Rahma Fitriana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Abstract


EFL learners need to develop their critical literacy when they are dealing with texts. By looking at the texts critically, students did not only comprehend the content of the text but also could train their language sensitivity, which examines whether the use of language is appropriate for the intended purposes, and could enhance their higher-order thinking capacity. Learners can practice their critical thinking by immersing themselves with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) activities, which enable the learners to examine linguistic units, social contexts, and the writer’s ideology behind the texts. The study attempts to analyze the ideology and framing strategy in a series of tweets posted by the former President of the United States of America, Donald Trump (@realDonalTrump) on the issue of immigrants, national security, and travel ban. It employed a textual analysis using Huckin’s framework (1989) model of CDA and collected the tweets from @realDonaldTrump account, which talked about, or had direct relations with, those three interrelated issues. The findings showed that most of his tweets framed certain groups of people badly using provocative words, images, and videos. A critical reading task is possible to do by adopting critical analysis of these Twitter posts, where EFL readers are trained to be aware of the linguistic and multimodal elements in the tweets and make a link of those elements with textual features and the broader social contexts.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., & Kim, J. (2015). Conceptualizing and assessing higher-order thinking in reading. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 203-212. doi:10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367

Blackledge, A. (2012). Discourse and power. In Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (Eds.). London: Routledge.

Bloommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: a critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron, L. (2012). Metaphors. In Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (Eds.). London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (Eds.). London: Routledge.

Goldfarb, A. (2017). @RealDonaldTrump and power: A corpus and critical discourse analysis. Proquest Dissertation Publishing.

Honeycutt, C., and Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.

Huckin, T. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In Miller, T. Functional approaches to written text: Classroom application. Washington: United States Information Agency

Huckin, T. (2002). Textual silence and the discourse of homelessness. Discourse & Society, 13(3), 347-372. doi:10.1177/0957926502013003054

Kramsch, C. (1998). The privilege of intercultural speaker. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kreis, R. (2017). refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on twitter. Discourse & Communication, 11(5), 498-514. doi:10.1177/1750481317714121

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction (2nd ed). New York; London;: Blomsbury Academic.

Paltridge, B. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In Ken Hyland (Eds.), Discourse studies reader: essential excerpts, (pp. 89-109). London: Bloomsbury

van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Critical discourse analysis. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse and ideology. In van Dijk (ed.). Discourse Studies: A Multidiscplinary Introduction, (pp.379-407). London: SAGE

Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Theory and interdisciplinarity in critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

Zappavigna, M., (2012). Discourse of twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lingped.v5i1.59935

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Lingua Pedagogia

Our Journal has been Indexed by:

     


Supervised by:

RJI Main logo

 

 View My Stats

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.