Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran statistika dan peluang dengan metode penemuan terbimbing berorientasi Kurikulum 2013 untuk siswa kelas X
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran statistika dan peluang untuk siswa SMA kelas X semester 2 dengan metode penemuan terbimbing yang terdiri atas RPP, LKS, dan instrumen penilaian yang memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis, dan efektif. Model pengembangan dalam penelitian ini adalah model 4D, terdiri atas tahap pendefinisian, perancangan, pengembangan, dan penyebaran. Analisis data kevalidan dan kepraktisan dilakukan dengan cara mengkonversi data kuantitatif berupa skor hasil penilaian menjadi data kualitatif skala lima. Analisis data keefektifan dilakukan dengan cara menentukan persentase ketuntasan belajar siswa berdasarkan hasil tes dan angket. Hasil validasi menunjukkan bahwa RPP yang dikembangkan memperoleh kategori baik, sedangkan LKS dan instrumen penilaian yang dikembangkan mencapai kategori sangat baik. Hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran menunjukkan bahwa keterlaksanaan pembelajaran statisika mencapai 94,12% sedangkan peluang mencapai 84,29%. Berdasarkan hasil tes dan angket, perangkat pembelajaran termasuk dalam kriteria efektif.
Kata Kunci: perangkat pembelajaran, penemuan terbimbing, statistika, peluang.
Developing Statistics and Probability Teaching Kit with Guided Discovery Learning Method Oriented to Curriculum 2013 for Grade X
Abstract
This research aimed to produce statistics and probability teaching kit for grade X students of Senior High School in 2nd semester with guided discovery learning consist of lesson plans, student worksheets, and assessment instruments which valid, practical, and effective. The developing model in this research was 4D model consist of define, design, develop, and disseminate. Validity and practicality were analyzed by converting the actual scores obtained into five scales of qualitative data. Effectiveness analyzed by determining the percentage of students’ completeness in a test and in the questionnaires. Validation result shows that the lesson plans have good category, the student worksheet and the assessment instrument have very good categories. The result of the application shows that the statistics application was 94,12% than the probability application was 84,29%. Based on the test and questionnaires result, the teaching kit was in effective term.
Keywords: teaching kit, guided discovery, statistics, probabilityKeywords
Full Text:
FULLTEXT PDFReferences
Afandi, A. (2013). Pendekatan open-ended dan inkuiri terbimbing ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan representasi multipel matematis. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i1.8489
Akanmu, M. A. & Fajemidagba, M. O. (2013). Guided-discovery learning strategy and senior school students performance in mathematics in Ejigbo, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(12), 82-89.
Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979).Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.
Alfieri, L., et al. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1-18.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
Azwar, S. (2015). Tes prestasi: fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar (edisi ke-2). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bell, F. H. (1981). Teaching and learning mathematics (in secondary school). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company.
Boynton, M. & Boynton, C. (2005). The educator’s guide to preventing and solving discipline problems, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Holdcroft, B. (2006). What is religiosity?. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 10(1), 89-103.
Hurlock, E. B. (1996). Psikologi Perkembangan (Edisi kelima). (Terjemahan Istiwidayanti & Soedjarwo). Jakarta: Erlangga
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inqury-based teaching. Educational Psychologist. 41(2), 75-86.
Koellhoffer, T. T. (2009). Character education: being fair and honest. New York, NY: Infobase Publishing.
Kurniawan, D., & Wustqa, D. (2014). Pengaruh perhatian orangtua, motivasi belajar, dan lingkungan sosial terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 176-187. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2674
Lickona, T. (2004). Character matters: how to help our children develop good judgment, integrity, and other essential virtues. New York, NY. Touchstone.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: how our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be athree-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
Menlove, F. L. (2012). The challenge of honesty. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 1(1), 44-53.
Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measuremet and assessment in teaching (10th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Mendikbud. (2014a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2014, tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah.
Mendikbud. (2014b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 Tahun 2014, tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Mendikbud. (2014c). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014, tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Moore, K. D. (2009). Effective instructional strategies: from theory to practice (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM Inc.
Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Orton, A. (2006). Learning mathematics (3rd Ed.). London: Continuum.
Rumasoreng, M., & Sugiman, S. (2014). Analisis kesulitan matematika siswa SMA/MA dalam menyelesaikan soal setara UN di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 22-34. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2661
Salleh, M.S. (2012). Religiosity in development: atheoretical construct of an Islamic-based development. International Journal Of Humanities And Social Science. , 2(14), 266-274.
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: an educational perspective (5th Ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Stringer, E. T., Christensen, L. M, & Baldwin, S. C. (2010). Integrating teaching, learning and action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.
Suydam, M. N. & Dessart, D. J. (1980). Skill learning. Dalam R. Shumway. (1980). Research Mathematics Education. Ohio State University: National Council Teachers of Mathematics.
Syawahid, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika terintegrasi dengan pengembangan kecerdasan emosional dan spiritual. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 12-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2654
Tamayo, A. M. (2014). Virtues of honesty in a higher education institution. American Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-6.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota
Tiliouine, H. & Belgoumidi, A. (2009). An exploratory study of religiosity, meaning in life and subjective wellbeinng in muslim students from Algeria. Applied Research Quality Life, 4(1), 109-127.
Tran, T., et al. (2014). Discovery learning with the help of geogebra dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 7(1), 44-57.
Yuliawati, F. (2010). Penerapan pendekatan penemuan terbimbing untuk meningkatkan karakter dan hasil belajar siswa kelas 5 SD Negeri Gembongan Sentolo Kulon Progo. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.6449
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika indexed by:
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All rights reserved. p-ISSN 2356-2684 | e-ISSN 2477-1503
View My Stats