Efektivitas blended learning dalam inovasi pendidikan era industri 4.0 pada mata kuliah teori tes klasik

Risky Setiawan, (Scopus ID: 57195803837) Department of Educational Research and Evaluation, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Djemari Mardapi, (Scopus ID: 57170711400) Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Afis Pratama, Universitas IVET Semarang, Indonesia
Syahri Ramadan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Tujuan penelitian ini terdiri dari: 1) mengeksplorasi pelaksanaan blended learning mata kuliah teori tes klasik; 2) mengembangkan sistem pembelajaran blended learning; dan 3) melihat efektivitas pelaksanaan pembelajaran blended learning di pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian partisipatoris tindakan dengan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif. Subjek yang digunakan adalah 18 siswa pascasarjana pada Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan dengan satu orang pengampu dan satu orang tutor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pembelajaran Blended Learning merupakan pembelajaran berbasis Active Learning yang sangat baik untuk di implementasikan pada pendidikan tinggi. Dengan kriteria utama yang harus dilakukan yaitu: 1) kesiapan fasilitas sistem dan perencanaan yang matang; 2) pengembangan konten yang lengkap dan menarik; dan 3) monitoring dan evaluasi secara rutin pada proses pembelajaran. Pembelajaran Blended pada Mata Kuliah TTK yang dilaksanakan pada satu semester memiliki kelebihan yaitu penyiapan materi dan relevansi materi yang disajikan sangat baik. Akan tetapi, masih ada kelemahan yaitu implementasi pembelajaran aktif masih belum maksimal disebabkan masih adanya proses adaptasi dari dosen dan mahasiswa karena sebelumnya belum pernah dilakukan perkuliahan berbasis Blended.

Kata kunci: Inovasi, pembelajaran, teori tes klasik


Effectiveness of blended learning in industrial era educational innovations 4.0 on classical test theory courses

Abstract

The purpose of this study consists of 1) to explore the implementation of classical learning theory approaches blended learning; 2) the development of a coeducational learning system, and 3) the effectiveness of implementing coeducational education in graduate courses at Yogyakarta State University. The method used is participatory research work with quantitative descriptive analysis. The materials used were 18 graduate students in research and educational assessment with one supervisor and one teacher. The results showed that blended learning is active learning based on learning and is very good to implement in higher education. With the main criteria to be done, namely; 1) readiness of system facilities and careful planning; 2) the development of complete and exciting content. 3) Monitoring and evaluation the learning process regularly. Combined learning in TTK courses conducted in one semester have advantages, namely the preparation of materials and the importance of the materials provided very well. However, there is still a weakness that the implementation of active learning is still not ideal because there is still an adaptation process of lecturers and students because previously, blended-based lectures never took place.

Keywords: Educational learning, classical test theory, innovative


Keywords


Inovasi; pembelajaran; teori tes klasik; educational learning; classical test theory; innovative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. 2018. Data Perguruan Tinggi dan mahasiswa di Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.bps.go.id

Behera, S. K. 2013. E-learning and m-learning: a comparative study. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3). 65-78. Retrieved from http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/ijonte_complete.pdf#page=72

Bowles-Terry, M., Hensley, M. K., & Hinchliffe, L. J. (2010). Best practice for online video tutorials in academic libraries: A study of student preferences and understanding. Communication in Information Literacy, 4(1), 17-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2010.4.1.86

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962

Ghorbani, S., Jafari, S. E. M., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to be: teachers competences and practical solutions: a step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0002

Gleason, N. W. (Ed) (2018). Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Singapore: Springer Published. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0

Nurre, G. S., & Sharkey, T. C. (2017). Online scheduling problems with flexible release dates: Applications to infrastructure restoration. Computers & Operations Research, 92, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.11.014

Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Tinggi nomor 44, Tahun 2015, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2012). Peraturan Meteri Pendidikan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24, tahun 2012, tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Jarak Jauh pada Pendidikan Tinggi.

Popkova, E. G., Ragulina, Y. V., & Bogovic, A. V. (Eds) (2018). Insdustry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st Century. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14, Tahun 2005, tentang Guru dan Dosen

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.27259

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Risky Setiawan, Djemari Mardapi, Afis Pratama, Syahri Ramadan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:

       

View Journal Statistics