Investigating Concept Mastery of Physics Students During Online Lectures Through Rasch Models on Force and Motion Materials

Fauzan Sulman; Lia Yuliati; Sentot Kusairi; Arif Hidayat; Jupeth Toriano Pentang; Bismark Mensah

doi:10.21831/jipi.v8i1.57308

Investigating Concept Mastery of Physics Students During Online Lectures Through Rasch Models on Force and Motion Materials

Fauzan Sulman, UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia
Lia Yuliati, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Sentot Kusairi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Arif Hidayat, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Jupeth Toriano Pentang, Western Philippines University, Philippines
Bismark Mensah, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

10.21831/jipi.v8i1.57308

Abstract

Conceptual understanding and problem solving is the most crucial part of Physics Lectures. In lectures, mastery of the concept is the primary goal. This research aims to analyze students' mastery of physics concepts in the material of Force and Motion while lectures are conducted online. This study uses a mixed-method approach to explain students' answers that still need clarification. Data analysis was carried out using the Rasch model, and a questionnaire was developed based on the possibility of students' responses to the concepts of force and motion. The results of this study indicate that students' understanding of the concept of force and motion material still needs to improve, namely 64.062%, around 94% of glasses tadris students think that the force and motion material given by lecturers during exams is challenging. More than 60.94% of students believe this is because the ability of the force and motion material they have still needs to improve. These results are interpreted based on analysis through the winstep application Version 3.65.0. and for qualitative data obtained from interviews. It takes a learning model that is appropriate for use in online and offline learning.

Keywords

Conceptual understanding, Rasch Models, Online Learning

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons Learned from the Hybrid Course Project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 9–21. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Lessons+Learned+from+the+Hybrid+Course+Project#0

Bayraktar, S. (2009). Misconceptions of Turkish pre-service teachers about force and motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9120-9

Bohori, M., & Liliawati, W. (2019). Analisis penguasaan konsep siswa menggunakan Rasch Model pada materi usaha dan energi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika, 0. http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/sinafi/article/view/579

Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2009). “Force,” Ontology, and Language. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010110

Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., Nieveen, N., & Mulder, M. (2014). Self-directed lifelong learning in hybrid learning configurations. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2013.838704

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.

Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118(June), 105440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440

Goodhew, L. M., Robertson, A. D., Heron, P. R. L., & Scherr, R. E. (2021). Students’ context-sensitive use of conceptual resources: A pattern across different styles of question about mechanical waves. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10137. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.010137

Gurcay, D., & Gulbas, E. (2015). Development of three-tier heat, temperature and internal energy diagnostic test. Research in Science and Technological Education, 33(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1018154

Hapke, H., Lee-Post, A., & Dean, T. (2020). 3-in-1 Hybrid Learning Environment. Marketing Education Review, 00(00), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1855989

Hariharasudan, A., & Kot, S. (2018). A scoping review on Digital English and Education 4.0 for Industry 4.0. Social Sciences, 7(11), 0–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110227

Helms, S. A. (2014). Blended/hybrid courses: a review of the literature and recommendations for instructional designers and educators. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(6), 804–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745420

Kibirige, I., & Mamashela, D. (2022). High school students ’ misconceptions about force : what changed the flipped class experience ? 10(March), 0–3.

Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multipe representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111

Lestari, Syafril, S., Latifah, S., Engkizar, E., Damri, D., Asril, Z., & Yaumas, N. E. (2021). Hybrid learning on problem-solving abiities in physics learning: A literature review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012021

Lin, O. (2008). Student Views of Hybrid Learning. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784610

Meiliani, M., Tanti, T., & Sulman, F. (2021). Student Resources On Newton’s Lawa Concepts Reviewing From Gender: Identification Using Open-Ended Question. Indonesia Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 04(November), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i3.10177

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

Mestre, J. P., Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., & Ross, B. H. (2011). Conceptual Problem Solving in Physics. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 55). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00009-0

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Nehru, Riantoni, C., Rasmi, D. P., Kurniawan, W., & Iskandar. (2020). “Knowledge in pieces” view: Conceptual understanding analysis of pre-service physics teachers on direct current resistive electrical circuits. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.695853

Nisa’, F., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2019). Miskonsepsi Konsep Gerak Satu dan Dua Dimensi Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(10), 1380. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i10.12874

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2(April), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Putra, M. I. J., Junaid, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The Ability of the Question and Answer (Q&A) Method with the Help of Learning Videos against Student Learning Outcomes amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2160–2169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.768

Rosbottom, J. (2001). Hybrid learning - A safe route into web-based open and distance learning for the computer science teacher. Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/377435.377493

Rozal, E., Ananda, R., Zb, A., Fauziddin, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The Effect of Project-Based Learning through YouTube Presentations on English Learning Outcomes in Physics. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1924–1933. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1241

Scott, T. F., & Schumayer, D. (2018). Central distractors in Force Concept Inventory data. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010106

Shah, S. S., Shah, A. A., Memon, F., Kemal, A. A., & Soomro, A. (2021). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Applying the self-determination theory in the ‘new normal.’ Revista de Psicodidáctica, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.12.003

Shatalebi, B., Sharifi, S., & Javadi, H. (2011). An integrative teaching model in the globalization era with a teaching technology orientation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.036

Shea, T., Cooper, B. K., de Cieri, H., & Sheehan, C. (2012). Evaluation of a perceived organisational performance scale using Rasch model analysis. Australian Journal of Management, 37(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896212443921

Singh, C., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). Connecting three pivotal concepts in K-12 science state standards and maps of conceptual growth to research in physics education. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. Online, 5(2).

Smith, T. I., & Wittmann, M. C. (2008). Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. September, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020101

Stewart, J., Drury, B., Wells, J., Adair, A., Henderson, R., Ma, Y., Pérez-Lemonche, Á., & Pritchard, D. (2021). Examining the relation of correct knowledge and misconceptions using the nominal response model. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010122

Stoen, S. M., McDaniel, M. A., Frey, R. F., Hynes, K. M., & Cahill, M. J. (2020). Force concept inventory: More than just conceptual understanding. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 10105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010105

Sulman, F. (2012). Pengaruh Model Kooperatif Tipe Problem Possing dan Motivasi Awal Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 12 Padang.

Sulman, F. (2019). Application of Cooperative Problem Posing and Prior Motivation Towards Students Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research (IJER), 4(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.30631/ijer.v4i2.126

Sulman, F., Sutopo, S., & Kusairi, S. (2021). FMCE-PHQ-9 Assessment with Rasch Model in Detecting Concept Understanding , Cheating , and Depression amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.9273

Sulman, F., Tanti, T., Habibi, M., & Zb, A. (2021). Pengaruh Media Animasi Berkarakter Islami Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengetahuan Bumi dan Antariksa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1044

Sulman, F., Taqwa, M. R. A., Aminah Zb, A. Z., Rafzan, R., & Fikri, A. (2020). The Effect of Mathematical Connections on the Mastery of Probability Material. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.645

Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Hybrid Learning Model : Its Impact on Mastery of Concepts and Self- Regulation in Newton ’ s Second Law Material. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i1.273

Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Purnama, B. Y., & Arief, M. R. (2022). Creativity In Deriving The Fermi-Dirac Equation Through STEAM Approaches. 10(3). https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i3.13182

Sutopo, S., Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. (2012). Impact of Representational Approach on the Improvement of Studentsâ€TM Understanding of Acceleration. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v8i2.2156

Tao, H. feng, Paszke, W., Rogers, E., Gałkowski, K., & Yang, H. zhong. (2018). Modified Newton method based iterative learning control design for discrete nonlinear systems with constraints. Systems and Control Letters, 118, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2018.05.007

Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18863

Tseng, W. T., Su, T. Y., & Nix, J. M. L. (2019). Validating Translation Test Items via the Many-Facet Rasch Model. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 748–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118768664

Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2021). We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70(October 2020), 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101027

Wells, J., Henderson, R., Stewart, J., Stewart, G., Yang, J., & Traxler, A. (2019). Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20122. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Ananda, R., Habibi, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). DISTANCE LEARNING WITH STEAM APPROACHES: Is Effect On The Cognitive Domain? 6(2), 129–140.

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., Rozal, E., & Sulman, F. (2021). Investigating Hybrid Learning Strategies: Does it Affect Creativity? Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4063

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., & Sulman, F. (2020). Pengaruh E-Learning Berbasis Schoology Berbantuan WhatsApp Group terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Khidmah, 3(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.29406/al-khidmah.v3i2.2282

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.57308