Implementing web-based e-scaffolding enhances learning (ESEL) at the center of mass conceptual understanding

Lia Laela Sarah; Yudi Ananto; Dona Octonary; Lissiana Nussifera

doi:10.21831/jipi.v8i1.46476

Implementing web-based e-scaffolding enhances learning (ESEL) at the center of mass conceptual understanding

Lia Laela Sarah, SMA Labschool UPI, Indonesia
Yudi Ananto, SMAN 1 Kota Bima, Indonesia
Dona Octonary, SEAMOLEC, Indonesia
Lissiana Nussifera, SMA Labschool UPI, Indonesia

10.21831/jipi.v8i1.46476

Abstract

Many online learning models are alternatives due to the Covid-19 pandemic in synchronous, asynchronous, or mixed-mode. However, resources to support independent student learning in Indonesia were still limited. The focus topic of the study is developing students' understanding of the physics concept of center of mass. A Web-based E-Scaffolding Enhance Learning (ESEL) was identified and implemented. This study used a quasi-experiment, one group, pretest-posttest design. Forty-one students participated in the research. The ESEL model involved four phases: sense-making, process management, articulation, and reflection. Students undertook ESEL-based activity developed for the online asynchronous mode implementation. In addition, synchronous meetings and sharing of learning results using an online platform. Data analysis shows that the web-based ESEL model supported online learning of the center of mass concept, though some improvements are possible. Specifically, learning outcomes increased with a significant value increase between the pre-test and post-test, and a normalized gain score of 0.73 indicated effective learning in high criteria. This research shows that the web-based ESEL approach is an effective self-directed learning tool for online physics classrooms.

Keywords

E-scaffolding, web based, online learning

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Ardiyati, T. K., Wilujeng, I., Kuswanto, H., & Jumadi. (2019). The effect of the scaffolding approach assisted by PhET simulation on the achievement of science process skills in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012035

Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J. S. (2017). Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environment. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 5-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0

Brauer, S., Korhonen, A. M., & Siklander, P. (2019). Online scaffolding in digital open badge-driven learning. Educational Research, 61(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1562953

Cai, Z., Mao, P., Wang, D., He, J., Chen, X., & Fan, X. (2022). Effects of Scaffolding in Digital Game-Based Learning on Student's Achievement: a Three-Level Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09655-0

Dasilva, B. E., Kuswanto, H., Wilujeng, I., & Jumadi. (2019). SSP development with a scaffolding approach assisted by PhET simulation on light refraction to improve students' critical thinking skills and achievement of science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012044

Dewi, P. S., Rochintaniawati, D., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Profiling the context of natural history teacher candidate for the elementary school degree through web-based inquiry. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.30991

Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. Sage.

Hamid, R., Sentryo, I., & Hasan, S. (2020). Online learning and its problems in the Covid-19 emergency period. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i1.32165

Jumaat, N. F., & Tasir, Z. (2014). Instructional scaffolding in an online learning environment: A meta-analysis. Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, IEEE, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.22

Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Axelrod, D. (2018). Scaffolding for an optimal challenge in K–12 problem-based learning. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 13(1). https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.7771/1541-5015.1712

Konstantinidis, A., Theodosiadou, D., & Pappos, C. (2013). Web 2.0 tools for supporting teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.55896

Linder, S. P., Abbott, D., & Fromberger, M. J. (2006). An instructional scaffolding approach to teaching software design. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 238–250. https://doi.org/ 10.5555/1127442.1127472

Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.131

Nisa, H., Namira, F., Jasmidi, J., Sudrajat, A., & Juwitaningsih, T. (2021). Analysis of online learning based edmodo in pandemic era in atomic structure classes x at senior high school harapan 1 Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13(3), 212-222. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29104

Nurliani, R., Sinaga, P., Rusdiana, D. (2019). Problems of online learning and using information and communication technology (ICT) in physics learning at Sumedang, West Java. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1806, 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012043

Özgelen, S. (2012). Students' science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a

Quintana, C., & Fishman, B. (2006). Supporting science learning and teaching with software-based scaffolding. American Educational Research Association, 1–20.

Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4

Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2018). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. In Educational Psychologist, 235-244. Routledge.

Ramadhani, R. , Umam, R. , Abdurrahman, A. & Syazali, M. (2019). The Effect of Flipped-Problem Based Learning Model Integrated With LMS-Google Classroom for Senior High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350

Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548

Santhalia, P., & Sampebatu, E. (2020). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif dalam membantu pembelajaran fisika di era Covid-19. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.31985

Sarah, L. L. (2021). The implementation of discovery learning using a personal site in the online physics classroom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1957. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1957/1/012042

Toledano, C. A. (2013). Web 2.0: the origin of the word that has changed how we understand public relations. Proceedings of Barcelona International PR Conference, 1-12.

Tuada, R. N., & Suparno. (2021). Increasing Student's Hots Using Mobile Technology and Scaffolding Approach on Sound Wave Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.26949

Tyagi, S. (2012). Adopting Web 2.0 Technology in Higher Education: A Case Study of Universities in National Capital Region, India. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(2), 28–43.

Wijaya, T. T., Zhou, Y., Purnama, A., & Hermita, N. (2020). Indonesian students are learning attitudes towards online learning during the coronavirus pandemic. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 3(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v3i1.56

Wilson, D. W., Lin, X., Longstreet, P., & Sarker, S. (2011). Web 2.0: A definition, literature review, and directions for future research. AMCIS 2011 proceedings. 368.

Sari, Y. P., Serevina, V., & Astra, I. M. (2019, April). Developing E-Module for fluids based on problem-based learning (PBL) for senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1185 (1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012052

Yusuf, M., & Wulan, A. R. (2016). Penerapan model discovery learning tipe shared dan webbed untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan KPS siswa. Edusains, 8(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1730

Zhou, M., & Lam, K. K. L. (2019). Metacognitive scaffolding for online information search in K-12 and higher education settings: a systematic review. Educational technology research and development, 67(6), 1353-1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09646-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.46476